Ad is loading...
WU
Price
$10.86
Change
+$0.14 (+1.31%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
76 days until earnings call
XYF
Price
$6.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

WU vs XYF

Header iconWU vs XYF Comparison
Open Charts WU vs XYFBanner chart's image
Western Union Company (The)
Price$10.86
Change+$0.14 (+1.31%)
Volume$2.98M
CapitalizationN/A
X Financial
Price$6.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.28K
CapitalizationN/A
WU vs XYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
XYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
WU vs. XYF commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WU is a Sell and XYF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (WU: $10.86 vs. XYF: $6.25)
Brand notoriety: WU and XYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: WU: 59% vs. XYF: 12%
Market capitalization -- WU: $4.7B vs. XYF: $185.86M
WU [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $4.7B. XYF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $185.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

WU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • WU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, XYF is a better buy in the long-term than WU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • WU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WU is a better buy in the short-term than XYF.

Price Growth

WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while XYF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

WU is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.14% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WU($4.7B) has a higher market cap than XYF($186M). WU has higher P/E ratio than XYF: WU (8.18) vs XYF (1.08). XYF YTD gains are higher at: 84.991 vs. WU (-3.592). XYF has less debt than WU: XYF (663M) vs WU (2.67B). WU has higher revenues than XYF: WU (4.36B) vs XYF (1.75B).
WUXYFWU / XYF
Capitalization4.7B186M2,528%
EBITDA1.04BN/A-
Gain YTD-3.59284.991-4%
P/E Ratio8.181.08759%
Revenue4.36B1.75B249%
Total Cash3.22BN/A-
Total Debt2.67B663M402%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WU vs XYF: Fundamental Ratings
WU
XYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
1210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XYF's Valuation (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (59). This means that XYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

XYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (100). This means that XYF’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

XYF's SMR Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (12). This means that XYF’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

XYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WU (74). This means that XYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WU’s over the last 12 months.

XYF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WU (74). This means that XYF’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WUXYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
XYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INCM26.900.09
+0.34%
Franklin Income Focus ETF
MUNI52.120.04
+0.08%
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bd Actv ETF
CSA77.19N/A
N/A
VictoryShares US Small Cap Vol Wtd ETF
IOCT29.34-0.07
-0.24%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct
DULL8.24-0.21
-2.52%
MicroSectors™ Gold -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN

WU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WU has been loosely correlated with BBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WU jumps, then BBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WU
1D Price
Change %
WU100%
+1.31%
BBDC - WU
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
UPBD - WU
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
OMF - WU
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
CACC - WU
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
SLM - WU
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.71%
More

XYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYF has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XYF jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYF
1D Price
Change %
XYF100%
N/A
LX - XYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
YRD - XYF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
WU - XYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
URI - XYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
SNTG - XYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
More