XPEV vs ZIM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is XPEV is a Buy and ZIM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
XPEV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- XPEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZIM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
XPEV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- XPEV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
XPEV (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +12.11% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was -9.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
XPEV is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2025.
ZIM is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+3.72% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
@Marine Shipping (-0.26% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| XPEV | ZIM | XPEV / ZIM | |
| Capitalization | 7.74B | 3.09B | 251% |
| EBITDA | -9.69B | -437.3M | 2,216% |
| Gain YTD | -16.861 | 137.960 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 21.1B | 5.97B | 353% |
| Total Cash | 24.5B | 1.59B | 1,542% |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 5.6B | 254% |
| XPEV | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
XPEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPEV has been closely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XPEV jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPEV | 100% | +8.98% | ||
| NIO - XPEV | 72% Closely correlated | +10.46% | ||
| GELYY - XPEV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| BYDDF - XPEV | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| BYDDY - XPEV | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| LI - XPEV | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||