LI
Price
$11.70
Change
+$0.04 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XPEV
Price
$10.29
Change
-$0.19 (-1.81%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.89B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LI vs XPEV

LI vs XPEV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LI vs. XPEV commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LI is a Hold and XPEV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LI vs XPEV: Fundamental Ratings
LI
XPEV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1515
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XPEV's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LI (98). This means that XPEV’s stock grew somewhat faster than LI’s over the last 12 months.

XPEV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LI (100). This means that XPEV’s stock grew similarly to LI’s over the last 12 months.

LI's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as XPEV (94). This means that LI’s stock grew similarly to XPEV’s over the last 12 months.

LI's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as XPEV (84). This means that LI’s stock grew similarly to XPEV’s over the last 12 months.

LI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPEV (100). This means that LI’s stock grew significantly faster than XPEV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIXPEV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2026
Stock price -- (LI: $11.70 vs. XPEV: $10.29)
Brand notoriety: LI and XPEV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LI: 60% vs. XPEV: 65%
Market capitalization -- LI: $11.23B vs. XPEV: $9.89B
LI [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $11.23B. XPEV’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $9.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.86K to $1.48T. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $72.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XPEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XPEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LI and XPEV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPEV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XPEV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XPEV is a better buy in the short-term than LI.

Price Growth

LI (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -2.74% price change this week, while XPEV (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

LI is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.

XPEV is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-4.53% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

View a ticker or compare two or three
LI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XPEV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GORO3.550.02
+0.57%
Goldgroup Mining Inc
PLUS91.58-0.67
-0.73%
ePlus
HAS86.91-0.81
-0.92%
Hasbro
HFBL24.90-0.87
-3.38%
Home Federal Bancorp
SMTK1.69-0.10
-5.59%
Smartkem Inc

LI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LI has been loosely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LI jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LI
1D Price
Change %
LI100%
+1.22%
NIO - LI
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
XPEV - LI
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
NIU - LI
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
TM - LI
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
HMC - LI
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

XPEV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPEV has been loosely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPEV jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPEV
1D Price
Change %
XPEV100%
-1.81%
NIO - XPEV
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
TSLA - XPEV
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
LCID - XPEV
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
TM - XPEV
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
RIVN - XPEV
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More