Z vs ZG
To understand the difference between Zillow Group Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class C (Z) vs. Zillow Group Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A (ZG) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class C and Ordinary Shares - Class A
Ordinary Shares - Class C - Ordinary shares Class C usually refers to ordinary shares with no-voting rights (except for the cases described in the company's reports) . Investors of Class C shares are not entitled to offer a proposal to make a merger, takeover, or other change of control proposal, or to engage in a proxy contest for the election of directors. The issuance of shares Class C won't result in voting dilution to the holders of shares Class A and B. The holders of Class C stock will be entitled to share equally with the holders of Class A Stock and Class B Stock any dividends that the company may authorize.
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
Z’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- Z’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
Z’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- Z’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
Z (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -1.15% price change this week, while ZG (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
Z is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
ZG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (+0.64% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| Z | ZG | Z / ZG | |
| Capitalization | 11.2B | 11.2B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 104M | 104M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 26.236 | 24.700 | 106% |
| P/E Ratio | 129.87 | 128.21 | 101% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 1.95B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 2.81B | 2.81B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 1.83B | 1.83B | 100% |
Z | ZG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 13 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZG's Valuation (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as Z (81). This means that ZG’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
Z's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (75). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's SMR Rating (87) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (87). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (37). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
Z's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZG (100). This means that Z’s stock grew similarly to ZG’s over the last 12 months.
| Z | ZG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AZTD | 24.39 | N/A | N/A |
| Aztlan Global Stock Sel Dm SMID ETF | |||
| BIZD | 16.30 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| VanEck BDC Income ETF | |||
| VWO | 45.12 | -0.09 | -0.20% |
| Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| FILL | 25.06 | -0.09 | -0.35% |
| iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | |||
| GOVZ | 10.41 | -0.05 | -0.48% |
| iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bd ETF | |||
Z and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Z has been closely correlated with ZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if Z jumps, then ZG could also see price increases.
ZG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZG has been closely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZG jumps, then Z could also see price increases.