The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, track the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index (the “Index”)... Show more
The Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index. The underlying index targets a selection of global securities in the rare earths industry, spanning mining, separation, refining, and production, while explicitly excluding Chinese-domiciled companies.
The fund maintains a concentrated, pure-play mandate. It invests at least 80% of total assets in companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue or assets from rare earths activities. As of recent reporting, the portfolio holds about 41 issuers, with a top-heavy structure: Lynas Rare Earths (roughly 21%) and MP Materials (roughly 19%) lead the list, followed by Iluka Resources, Neo Performance Materials, Sunrise Energy Metals, USA Rare Earth, and Critical Metals. Basic materials represent about 92% of sector exposure. The fund carries a total annual operating expense ratio of 0.65% and is structured as a passive, index-tracking ETF with assets under management (AUM) that has fluctuated in the tens of millions of dollars.
Rare earths are a group of 17 metallic elements whose magnetic, optical, and chemical properties make them essential inputs for permanent magnets used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, defense systems, and advanced electronics. Despite their name, the elements are relatively abundant in the Earth's crust; what is scarce is economically viable deposits and the technically complex separation and refining capacity needed to process them.
Supply remains highly concentrated. China has historically accounted for the overwhelming majority of global refined rare earths output and permanent magnet production, and export controls have raised the urgency among Western governments and manufacturers to diversify sourcing. This has fueled policy initiatives focused on supply chain security, strategic stockpiling, and support for non-Chinese producers, particularly in the United States and Australia. The investment thesis behind REXC rests on this structural realignment; however, the theme has also proven sensitive to sentiment swings around rare earths prices, demand from electric-vehicle and defense end markets, and the pace at which Western capacity actually reaches commercial scale.
REXC began trading in April 2026 and quickly gathered attention as the first pure-play, ex-China rare earths ETF. After an early inflow-driven rally, the fund entered a prolonged correction. Over the trailing 30 days, the share price has declined roughly 3.7%, a comparatively modest move. The three-month picture is starker, with the fund down approximately 33%, and total return since inception remains deeply negative.
The drawdown reflects pressure across the fund's largest holdings rather than a single isolated catalyst. MP Materials and USA Rare Earth, two prominent US-listed components, have experienced significant share-price declines during the period, weighing on the fund's net asset value (NAV) even as broader equity markets advanced. Smaller exploration and development names, including NioCorp Developments and Energy Fuels, have added to volatility given their reliance on project financing, permitting timelines, and capital-market access. The fund's concentration in mid- and small-cap miners, combined with exposure to Australian and Canadian listed names, means its performance is closely tied to rare earths pricing and investor appetite for pre-production growth stories rather than diversified index dynamics.
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery platform that helps investors search thousands of securities using technical indicators, fundamentals, volatility measures, AI-generated signals, market trends, price patterns, and customizable filters. It is designed to surface trending securities, breakout candidates, and new trading opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, and it can be tailored to specific sectors and industries—including the critical-materials space that defines REXC. Investors analyzing thematic funds may find it a useful complement for identifying correlated movers and confirming momentum. Explore the screener to refine your ETF and equity research workflow.
Several structural factors are likely to shape REXC's trajectory through 2026. First, rare earths pricing and the pace of demand recovery in electric-vehicle, wind, and defense end markets will remain central, since the fund's holdings are leveraged to both volumes and margins. Second, interest rate and inflation expectations matter directly: higher financing costs weigh on capital-intensive developers and dampen valuations for pre-revenue miners. Third, government policy—including export restrictions, subsidies, and strategic procurement from Western suppliers—represents a key swing factor, though policy announcements do not always translate into near-term revenues.
Investors should also monitor the operating and execution milestones of the largest holdings, given their outsized influence on the fund, as well as capital flows into thematic ETFs, which can amplify both rallies and drawdowns in a relatively small, concentrated fund. Permitting, regulatory, and financing developments for new rare earths projects present additional risks and potential catalysts. These themes will define the environment for REXC over the coming months, without implying any specific direction for its share price.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for REXC turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where REXC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 3 of 3 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where REXC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 4 of 5 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 3 of 4 cases where REXC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Following a +7.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where REXC advanced for three days, in 18 of 22 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
REXC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on REXC as a result. In 7 of 7 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where REXC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for REXC entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows