Advertisement
ADC or EARN or FISK
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFISK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ADC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FISK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FISK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FISK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ADC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while FISK (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
FISK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.02% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
ADC | FISK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FISK's Valuation (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADC (95). This means that FISK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADC’s over the last 12 months.
ADC's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FISK (85). This means that ADC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FISK’s over the last 12 months.
FISK's SMR Rating (83) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ADC (85). This means that FISK’s stock grew similarly to ADC’s over the last 12 months.
ADC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FISK (64). This means that ADC’s stock grew similarly to FISK’s over the last 12 months.
ADC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FISK (77). This means that ADC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FISK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADC | EARN | FISK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
ADC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADC has been closely correlated with O. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADC jumps, then O could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADC | 100% | +2.83% | ||
| O - ADC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| NNN - ADC | 72% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| FCPT - ADC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| VICI - ADC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| EPRT - ADC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
FISK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FISK and APYRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FISK and APYRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FISK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FISK | 100% | N/A | ||
| APYRF - FISK | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| MNARF - FISK | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| IIPR - FISK | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| ATRRF - FISK | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NHPBP - FISK | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||