AEM
Price
$153.49
Change
-$6.67 (-4.16%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
77.08B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SA
Price
$24.74
Change
-$2.32 (-8.57%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.67B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WPM
Price
$112.82
Change
-$3.64 (-3.13%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
51.48B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM or SA or WPM

AEM vs SA vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM) vs. Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AEM shows solid earnings momentum with low‑beta exposure to gold, supported by expanding mine life and modest dividend yield.
  • SA is under pressure from lower ore grades and higher costs, resulting in a steep price decline and a negative earnings surprise.
  • WPM benefits from its streaming model, delivering high net margins and record revenue growth despite broader market volatility.
  • All three stocks trade in the precious‑metals sector, but their risk‑return profiles diverge sharply: AEM is a traditional miner, SA a junior explorer, and WPM a low‑cost streaming vehicle.
  • Tickeron’s AI bots favor the stock with the most consistent trend and cash‑flow stability, which currently points toward WPM.

Introduction

Gold‑related equities remain a focal point for investors seeking a hedge against inflation and geopolitical uncertainty. This article compares three publicly traded companies that represent distinct ways to gain exposure to precious metals: AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.), SA (Seabridge Gold Inc.), and WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.). The analysis is geared toward both active traders monitoring short‑term price dynamics and long‑term investors evaluating sector positioning.

AEM Overview and Recent Performance

Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. is a senior gold producer with operations in Canada, Finland, Australia and Mexico. The company’s strategy centers on low‑cost, high‑grade mines such as LaRonde, Canadian Malartic and Goldex, and on extending mine life through underground development. In recent weeks the stock has traded in a tight range around the low‑mid $190 price level, reflecting a modest gain of roughly 1‑2% after the release of Q1 2026 results. Earnings beat expectations, driven by higher gold prices (average $1,960/oz) and a 6% increase in attributable production. The company posted a net margin above 30% and raised its quarterly dividend to $0.45 per share, yielding about 0.9% (dividend (DIV) is the cash paid to shareholders per share). AEM’s beta (β) of 0.62 indicates lower volatility relative to the broader market, and its price‑to‑earnings (P/E) ratio of 22 remains attractive for a gold miner.

SA Overview and Recent Performance

Seabridge Gold Inc. focuses on acquiring, exploring and developing high‑purity gold projects in North America, notably the KSM (Kerr‑Sulphurets‑Mitchell) joint‑venture in British Columbia. The stock has been under pressure, slipping over 20% in the past month as assay results from the KSM underground development showed lower-than‑expected ore grades, increasing cost per ounce. The most recent earnings release posted a net loss of $23 million, a surprise miss versus the consensus estimate of a $2 million profit. The company’s cash burn accelerated, pushing the debt‑to‑equity ratio above 55%, while the dividend remains at zero. SA’s beta of 2.9 signals high price sensitivity, and its forward P/E ratio now exceeds 300, reflecting the market’s skepticism about near‑term profitability.

WPM Overview and Recent Performance

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. is a streaming and royalty firm that purchases a fixed percentage of future precious‑metal production from operating mines. Its portfolio includes streams of gold, silver, palladium and platinum from 18 mines, providing exposure to multiple commodities without the operational risk of mining. In the latest quarter (Q1 2026), WPM reported record revenue of $1.83 billion and net income of $254 million, delivering a net margin above 55% and a 53% year‑over‑year earnings per share increase to $2.20. The stock rallied about 5% after the earnings beat, and the dividend was raised to $0.66 per share (≈0.45% yield). With a beta of 0.52, WPM is the least volatile of the three, and its price‑to‑earnings forward (FWD‑P/E) of 37 signals a premium for growth but still justified by strong cash‑flow generation.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a library of hundreds of AI Trading Bots that cover thousands of tickers across global markets. Only the highest‑performing bots—those demonstrating consistent risk‑adjusted returns, drawdown control under 15% and win‑rates above 55%—are featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots span diverse strategies, from short‑term momentum scalping to multi‑week trend‑following, and support multiple timeframes (intraday, daily, weekly). Traders can review each bot’s Sharpe ratio, average trade duration and backtested performance before deploying capital.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: AEM is a traditional miner (exploration + production), SA is a junior explorer with a high‑risk development pipeline, while WPM operates a streaming model, receiving a pre‑agreed royalty on metal output.
  • Growth Drivers: AEM’s growth stems from extending mine life and modest underground expansions; SA relies on the eventual development of KSM, which is currently uncertain; WPM’s growth comes from adding new streams and expanding existing ones, evident in its recent Antamina silver exposure.
  • Recent Momentum: AEM shows modest upside, SA is in a downtrend, and WPM enjoys a strong upward swing after earnings.
  • Risk Factors: AEM faces operational cost pressure and geopolitical exposure in Canada; SA carries exploration risk, high debt, and grade volatility; WPM’s primary risk is counterparty exposure—if partner mines underperform, streaming payouts decline.
  • Sector Exposure: All three track gold prices, but WPM also benefits from silver and base‑metal price diversification.
  • Valuation Sensitivity: AEM’s P/E is in line with peers, SA’s forward P/E is highly inflated, and WPM commands a premium due to its high margins and cash flow stability.
  • Market Sentiment: Investor sentiment is positive for WPM (high net margin, low β), neutral for AEM (steady dividend), and negative for SA (grade miss and earnings loss).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on current trend consistency, cash‑flow robustness and low volatility, Tickeron’s AI models would assign the highest probability of short‑term upside to WPM. The streaming structure delivers stable earnings even when metal prices fluctuate, and the recent earnings beat reinforces its momentum. AEM remains a solid long‑term play, while SA’s negative earnings surprise and high beta reduce its AI‑favored ranking.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $160.16SA: $27.06WPM: $116.46)
Brand notoriety: AEM and SA are not notable and WPM is notable
The three companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 122%, SA: 68%, WPM: 88%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $77.08B, SA: $2.67B, WPM: $51.48B
$AEM is valued at $77.08B, while SA has a market capitalization of $2.67B, and WPM's market capitalization is $51.48B. The market cap for tickers in this @Precious Metals ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Precious Metals industry is $10.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and WPM’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the long-term than AEM, which in turn is a better option than SA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WPM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the short-term than AEM and SA.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.91% price change this week, while SA (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.32% , and WPM (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated -9.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -13.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

SA is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-13.09% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($77.1B) has a higher market cap than WPM($51.5B) and SA($2.67B). SA has higher P/E ratio than WPM and AEM: SA (222.18) vs WPM (30.76) and AEM (15.71). WPM YTD gains are higher at: -0.597 vs. SA (-2.213) and AEM (-5.125). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.74B vs. WPM (2.4B) and SA (-87.49M). AEM has higher revenues than WPM and SA: AEM (13.5B) vs WPM (2.75B) and SA (0).
AEMSAWPM
Capitalization77.1B2.67B51.5B
EBITDA9.74B-87.49M2.4B
Gain YTD-5.125-2.213-0.597
P/E Ratio15.71222.1830.76
Revenue13.5B02.75B
Total Cash3.12BN/A2.17B
Total Debt319MN/A7.66M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs SA vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
SA
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
125710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
496141
SMR RATING
1..100
429443
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
574051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
876193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5044

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WPM's Valuation (42) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (93) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SA (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that WPM's stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s and somewhat faster than SA’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (49) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SA (61) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that WPM's stock grew similarly to AEM’s and similarly to SA’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (43) in the Precious Metals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SA (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and somewhat faster than SA’s over the last 12 months.

SA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (51) in the Precious Metals industry, and is in the same range as AEM (57) in the null industry. This means that SA's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

SA's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (87) in the null industry, and is in the same range as WPM (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SA's stock grew similarly to AEM’s and similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMSAWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNHW53.020.33
+0.63%
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
PFL7.590.02
+0.26%
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund
DEED21.380.01
+0.07%
First Trust Securitized Plus ETF
ABLD30.04-0.21
-0.69%
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
IPAC81.43-2.75
-3.27%
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF