Investors navigating the healthcare ETF landscape find AGNG, IHE, and XLV compelling for comparison amid persistent sector themes like demographic aging and pharmaceutical innovation. AGNG targets a global thematic strategy focused on longevity, while IHE hones in on U.S. pharmaceuticals, and XLV delivers passive, broad U.S. healthcare sector replication. These funds represent varied approaches: thematic niche (AGNG), subsector specialization (IHE), and comprehensive sector exposure (XLV). With healthcare's defensive qualities shining in volatile markets and macro drivers like rising elderly populations fueling demand, this trio highlights trade-offs in diversification, costs, and targeted growth potential within a resilient industry.
The Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is a passive thematic fund seeking to track the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. It invests in companies benefiting from global longevity trends, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and senior living facilities. With 84 holdings, AGNG features sector allocations of 91.1% healthcare and 8.9% real estate. Top holdings include Novo Nordisk (3.82%), Welltower (3.23%), Ventas (VTR, 3.19%), Edwards Lifesciences (3.14%), and Roche (3.12%). The expense ratio stands at 0.50%, reflecting its specialized index construction with modified market-cap weighting and annual rebalancing for diversification. This structure offers unconstrained global exposure, distinguishing it as a smart beta thematic play on aging demographics.
The iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) is a passive fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index, focusing on U.S. equities manufacturing prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, and vaccines. It holds 55 stocks with nearly 100% pharmaceuticals allocation. Top holdings dominate: Eli Lilly (LLY, 21.78%), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, 20.91%), Viatris (5.54%), Royalty Pharma (4.99%), and Merck (MRK, 4.40%). The expense ratio is 0.38%, with quarterly rebalancing typical for the market-cap-weighted index. IHE's concentrated profile suits investors seeking targeted pharma exposure, though it amplifies single-stock risks from its top-heavy build.
The State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) passively replicates the Health Care Select Sector Index, comprising S&P 500 healthcare firms across pharmaceuticals, providers, biotech, equipment, and life sciences. It maintains 60 holdings with 100% healthcare allocation: pharmaceuticals (36.57%), providers & services (19.35%), biotechnology (18.36%), equipment & supplies (16.69%), and life sciences tools (8.56%). Leading positions are Eli Lilly (14.81%), Johnson & Johnson (10.31%), AbbVie (6.93%), UnitedHealth Group (6.73%), and Merck (5.34%). At a low 0.08% expense ratio, XLV uses full replication with quarterly rebalancing, emphasizing large-cap liquidity and broad subsector balance for core healthcare positioning.
The healthcare sector faces a transformative environment shaped by aging populations, now comprising over 4% aged 80+ in the U.S. and projected to hit 5.2% by 2029, boosting demand for chronic care, biotech, and senior services. Pharmaceutical spending surges 8% annually, driven by specialty drugs and GLP-1 therapies for obesity and cardio risks, amid M&A for pipeline gaps and biosimilar reforms easing regulatory hurdles. Macro factors include inflation easing, workforce shortages, and site-of-care shifts to ASCs and home health. Regulatory pressures like drug pricing negotiations (e.g., Medicare rebates) and antitrust scrutiny temper growth, while AI integration and consumer-driven care enhance efficiency. Geopolitical tensions and reimbursement uncertainty pose risks, yet demographic tailwinds sustain capital flows into resilient healthcare equities.
In recent months, healthcare ETFs have navigated volatility, with XLV demonstrating superior trend consistency and lower drawdowns thanks to its diversified large-cap base and beta around 0.58-0.85. AGNG, with global thematic exposure, mirrors sector moves but exhibits higher volatility from real estate ties and mid-cap pharma sensitivity. IHE, heavily weighted to pharma giants, shows elevated swings tied to drug pricing news and innovation cycles, with deeper drawdowns during reimbursement headwinds. Structural differences explain variances: XLV's broad subsector mix buffers macro shocks, AGNG's longevity focus captures demographic uptrends steadily, and IHE amplifies concentration-driven momentum but heightens single-subsector risks. Over recent market cycles, low-cost, liquid XLV has edged peers on risk-adjusted terms.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using customizable criteria like technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, trends, and AI-generated signals. Scan for healthcare ETFs by industry, market cap, price patterns, or performance metrics to uncover breakout candidates, momentum plays, or value opportunities. Its advanced algorithms detect patterns invisible to manual screening, such as relative strength in AGNG versus XLV amid sector rotations. Ideal for identifying trade ideas efficiently, the screener streamlines market analysis—explore it today for smarter ETF comparisons.
Tickeron’s AI favors XLV with moderate conviction (65-70% probability edge) due to its unmatched cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), broad diversification across 60 holdings and healthcare subsectors, superior liquidity, and stable momentum in risk-adjusted terms. While AGNG's thematic global exposure and IHE's pharma purity offer niche appeal, XLV's large-cap structure best aligns with current healthcare resilience and lower volatility positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| AGNG | IHE | XLV | |
| Gain YTD | -2.655 | 11.650 | -0.853 |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 964M | 37.7B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.08 |
| Turnover | 9.93 | 24.00 | 2.00 |
| Yield | 0.90 | 1.62 | 1.68 |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | 28 years |
| AGNG | IHE | XLV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGNG has been loosely correlated with BMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGNG jumps, then BMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGNG | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| BMY - AGNG | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| AMGN - AGNG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| GMAB - AGNG | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| MDT - AGNG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| REGN - AGNG | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHE has been closely correlated with LLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHE jumps, then LLY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLV has been closely correlated with MRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLV jumps, then MRK could also see price increases.