AGNG
Price
$34.92
Change
+$0.04 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
81.17M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IHE
Price
$92.69
Change
+$0.25 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
919.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLV
Price
$153.01
Change
+$0.93 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
39.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGNG or IHE or XLV

Header iconAGNG vs IHE vs XLV Comparison
Open Charts AGNG vs IHE vs XLVBanner chart's image
AGNG vs IHE vs XLV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) vs. iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) vs. State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV)

Key Takeaways

  • AGNG offers a thematic tilt toward aging population trends with 91% healthcare and 9% real estate exposure, providing global diversification across 84 holdings but at a higher 0.50% expense ratio.
  • IHE delivers concentrated U.S. pharmaceuticals focus (nearly 100% sector allocation) with top two holdings exceeding 42%, balancing cost at 0.38% expense ratio and moderate liquidity.
  • XLV provides the broadest U.S. healthcare sector exposure (100% healthcare across subsectors) with superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), high liquidity, and large-cap stability via 60 holdings.
  • XLV exhibits the lowest relative volatility due to its diversified large-cap structure, while AGNG and IHE show higher sensitivity to thematic and pharma-specific risks.
  • All three benefit from healthcare tailwinds like aging demographics, but XLV's scale and low costs enhance long-term risk-adjusted positioning.
  • Concentration risk is highest in IHE, moderate in XLV, and mitigated in AGNG by global and cross-sector holdings.

Introduction

Investors navigating the healthcare ETF landscape find AGNG, IHE, and XLV compelling for comparison amid persistent sector themes like demographic aging and pharmaceutical innovation. AGNG targets a global thematic strategy focused on longevity, while IHE hones in on U.S. pharmaceuticals, and XLV delivers passive, broad U.S. healthcare sector replication. These funds represent varied approaches: thematic niche (AGNG), subsector specialization (IHE), and comprehensive sector exposure (XLV). With healthcare's defensive qualities shining in volatile markets and macro drivers like rising elderly populations fueling demand, this trio highlights trade-offs in diversification, costs, and targeted growth potential within a resilient industry.

Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) Overview

The Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is a passive thematic fund seeking to track the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. It invests in companies benefiting from global longevity trends, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and senior living facilities. With 84 holdings, AGNG features sector allocations of 91.1% healthcare and 8.9% real estate. Top holdings include Novo Nordisk (3.82%), Welltower (3.23%), Ventas (VTR, 3.19%), Edwards Lifesciences (3.14%), and Roche (3.12%). The expense ratio stands at 0.50%, reflecting its specialized index construction with modified market-cap weighting and annual rebalancing for diversification. This structure offers unconstrained global exposure, distinguishing it as a smart beta thematic play on aging demographics.

iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) Overview

The iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) is a passive fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index, focusing on U.S. equities manufacturing prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, and vaccines. It holds 55 stocks with nearly 100% pharmaceuticals allocation. Top holdings dominate: Eli Lilly (LLY, 21.78%), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, 20.91%), Viatris (5.54%), Royalty Pharma (4.99%), and Merck (MRK, 4.40%). The expense ratio is 0.38%, with quarterly rebalancing typical for the market-cap-weighted index. IHE's concentrated profile suits investors seeking targeted pharma exposure, though it amplifies single-stock risks from its top-heavy build.

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) Overview

The State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) passively replicates the Health Care Select Sector Index, comprising S&P 500 healthcare firms across pharmaceuticals, providers, biotech, equipment, and life sciences. It maintains 60 holdings with 100% healthcare allocation: pharmaceuticals (36.57%), providers & services (19.35%), biotechnology (18.36%), equipment & supplies (16.69%), and life sciences tools (8.56%). Leading positions are Eli Lilly (14.81%), Johnson & Johnson (10.31%), AbbVie (6.93%), UnitedHealth Group (6.73%), and Merck (5.34%). At a low 0.08% expense ratio, XLV uses full replication with quarterly rebalancing, emphasizing large-cap liquidity and broad subsector balance for core healthcare positioning.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The healthcare sector faces a transformative environment shaped by aging populations, now comprising over 4% aged 80+ in the U.S. and projected to hit 5.2% by 2029, boosting demand for chronic care, biotech, and senior services. Pharmaceutical spending surges 8% annually, driven by specialty drugs and GLP-1 therapies for obesity and cardio risks, amid M&A for pipeline gaps and biosimilar reforms easing regulatory hurdles. Macro factors include inflation easing, workforce shortages, and site-of-care shifts to ASCs and home health. Regulatory pressures like drug pricing negotiations (e.g., Medicare rebates) and antitrust scrutiny temper growth, while AI integration and consumer-driven care enhance efficiency. Geopolitical tensions and reimbursement uncertainty pose risks, yet demographic tailwinds sustain capital flows into resilient healthcare equities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, healthcare ETFs have navigated volatility, with XLV demonstrating superior trend consistency and lower drawdowns thanks to its diversified large-cap base and beta around 0.58-0.85. AGNG, with global thematic exposure, mirrors sector moves but exhibits higher volatility from real estate ties and mid-cap pharma sensitivity. IHE, heavily weighted to pharma giants, shows elevated swings tied to drug pricing news and innovation cycles, with deeper drawdowns during reimbursement headwinds. Structural differences explain variances: XLV's broad subsector mix buffers macro shocks, AGNG's longevity focus captures demographic uptrends steadily, and IHE amplifies concentration-driven momentum but heightens single-subsector risks. Over recent market cycles, low-cost, liquid XLV has edged peers on risk-adjusted terms.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using customizable criteria like technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, trends, and AI-generated signals. Scan for healthcare ETFs by industry, market cap, price patterns, or performance metrics to uncover breakout candidates, momentum plays, or value opportunities. Its advanced algorithms detect patterns invisible to manual screening, such as relative strength in AGNG versus XLV amid sector rotations. Ideal for identifying trade ideas efficiently, the screener streamlines market analysis—explore it today for smarter ETF comparisons.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors XLV with moderate conviction (65-70% probability edge) due to its unmatched cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), broad diversification across 60 holdings and healthcare subsectors, superior liquidity, and stable momentum in risk-adjusted terms. While AGNG's thematic global exposure and IHE's pharma purity offer niche appeal, XLV's large-cap structure best aligns with current healthcare resilience and lower volatility positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLV has more net assets: 39.2B vs. IHE (919M) and AGNG (81.2M). IHE has a higher annual dividend yield than XLV and AGNG: IHE (9.624) vs XLV (-0.750) and AGNG (-2.720). AGNG was incepted earlier than IHE and XLV: AGNG (10 years) vs IHE (20 years) and XLV (27 years). XLV (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IHE (0.38) and AGNG (0.50). IHE has a higher turnover AGNG (9.93) and XLV (2.00) vs AGNG (9.93) and XLV (2.00).
AGNGIHEXLV
Gain YTD-2.7209.624-0.750
Net Assets81.2M919M39.2B
Total Expense Ratio0.500.380.08
Turnover9.9324.002.00
Yield0.901.621.68
Fund Existence10 years20 years27 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGNGIHEXLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IHE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAOYX26.02N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opportunities Y
MPSSX17.89N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy M
TFOIX47.50N/A
N/A
Transamerica Capital Growth I
SCWFX81.43N/A
N/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
RSEIX16.50-0.10
-0.60%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Instl

AGNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGNG has been loosely correlated with BMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGNG jumps, then BMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGNG
1D Price
Change %
AGNG100%
+0.10%
BMY - AGNG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
GMAB - AGNG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
AMGN - AGNG
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
MDT - AGNG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
LLY - AGNG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

IHE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHE has been closely correlated with LLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHE jumps, then LLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHE
1D Price
Change %
IHE100%
+0.27%
LLY - IHE
76%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
MRK - IHE
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
BMY - IHE
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
PFE - IHE
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
JNJ - IHE
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More