AIQ
Price
$64.43
Change
+$1.91 (+3.06%)
Updated
Jun 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
10.5B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CIBR
Price
$86.17
Change
-$0.53 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jun 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIQ vs CIBR

Header iconAIQ vs CIBR Comparison
Open Charts AIQ vs CIBRBanner chart's image
AIQ vs CIBR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) vs. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR)

Key Takeaways

  • AIQ offers broader exposure to AI and big data enablers across semiconductors, software, and cloud, with heavy information technology weighting (76%), while CIBR focuses narrowly on cybersecurity firms, primarily in software and networking (94% technology).
  • AIQ holds 84 stocks globally with top weights in semiconductor leaders like SK Hynix (6.3%) and Micron (5.1%); CIBR has 42 holdings concentrated in cybersecurity specialists such as CrowdStrike (CRWD) (9.3%) and Palo Alto Networks (PANW) (8.8%).
  • CIBR's expense ratio of 0.58% is lower than AIQ's 0.68%, providing a cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • Both are passive index-tracking ETFs, but AIQ rebalances semi-annually with annual reconstitution, while CIBR rebalances quarterly and reconstitutes semi-annually, reflecting differing liquidity emphases.
  • AIQ's global diversification contrasts with CIBR's heavier U.S. tilt (around 89%), influencing geographic risk profiles.
  • In recent market cycles, AIQ has shown stronger momentum tied to AI hardware demand, while CIBR benefits from steady cybersecurity spending amid rising threats.

Introduction

Investors seeking technology-driven growth often weigh thematic ETFs like the Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) against specialized peers such as the First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). While both tap into high-demand tech subsectors, they diverge in scope: AIQ provides comprehensive exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) and big data ecosystems, encompassing hardware, software, and applications. CIBR, conversely, targets cybersecurity providers essential to digital infrastructure protection. This comparison is timely amid surging AI adoption and escalating cyber threats, fueled by geopolitical tensions and regulatory mandates. These ETFs offer alternative strategies for investors eyeing sector exposure, with AIQ suiting broad AI plays and CIBR appealing to defensive tech niches.

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) Overview

The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is a passive, thematic ETF tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in index securities, focusing on companies benefiting from AI development, utilization, and big data hardware analysis. With 84 holdings, AIQ employs a modified market-cap weighting, unconstrained by sector or geography.

Top holdings (as of May 2026) include SK Hynix Inc. (6.31%), Micron Technology Inc. (MU, 5.08%), Intel Corp. (INTC, 5.07%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. (4.75%), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD, 4.59%). Sector allocations emphasize information technology (75.7%), followed by communication services (9.6%) and consumer discretionary (8.5%). The expense ratio is 0.68%, with a 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.02%, indicating strong liquidity. The index undergoes semi-annual rebalancing and annual reconstitution.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a passive ETF tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, comprising companies classified as cybersecurity providers by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA). It invests at least 90% of net assets in index components, using a liquidity-weighted, modified market-cap approach with caps on top holdings (e.g., 6% individual, 30% collective for top five).

Featuring 42 holdings (excluding cash), top positions (as of May 2026) are CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (CRWD, 9.32%), Palo Alto Networks Inc. (PANW, ~8.8%), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO, ~9.6%), Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO, ~8.4%), and Fortinet Inc. (FTNT, ~7.1%). Sector exposure is dominated by technology (94%), with minor industrials (3%) and communication services (3%). The expense ratio stands at 0.58%. The index rebalances quarterly and reconstitutes semi-annually, promoting responsiveness to liquidity changes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The AI and cybersecurity sectors thrive amid digital transformation, with AI market projections reaching trillions by 2030 and cybersecurity spending exceeding $200 billion annually due to rising threats. Macro drivers include cloud migration, data proliferation, and AI integration, boosting demand for compute hardware (benefiting AIQ) and protective software (favoring CIBR). Capital flows into tech ETFs have accelerated, supported by interest rate stabilization and enterprise AI pilots. Regulatory developments, such as data privacy laws (e.g., GDPR expansions) and U.S. executive orders on cybersecurity, underscore structural tailwinds. Risks encompass supply chain disruptions in semiconductors, talent shortages, and valuation stretches amid economic slowdowns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, AIQ has outperformed amid AI hardware booms, driven by hyperscaler capex on semiconductors from top holdings like Nvidia (NVDA) and Broadcom. Its broader diversification tempers volatility compared to CIBR, which exhibits steadier returns tied to recurring cybersecurity revenues less sensitive to commodity cycles. CIBR's relative positioning strengthens during risk-off periods, benefiting from defensive sector rotation and consistent earnings from leaders like CrowdStrike. Volatility profiles differ: AIQ's beta around 1.44 reflects growth sensitivity, while CIBR's ~1.0 aligns with tech averages. Macro shifts, including interest rate expectations and geopolitical tensions, favor both but highlight AIQ's exposure to Asia supply chains versus CIBR's U.S. dominance.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors AIQ for its superior diversification profile, global exposure, and alignment with explosive AI infrastructure growth trends. While CIBR offers cost efficiency and niche stability, AIQ's broader holdings and semi-annual rebalancing provide stronger trend consistency and sector momentum, with probabilistic edge in recent cycles (e.g., ~4x YTD relative gains). This positioning suits growth-oriented portfolios, though relative merits shift with macro conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 11.87B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 10.5B to 13.25B. CIBR holds the highest valuation in this group at 13.25B. The lowest valued company is AIQ at 10.5B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -5%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 14%, and the average quarterly price growth was 19%. CIBR experienced the highest price growth at -3%, while AIQ experienced the biggest fall at -7%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 39%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 41% and the average quarterly volume growth was 301%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
AIQ vs. CIBR commentary
Jun 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIQ is a Hold and CIBR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 13.2B vs. AIQ (10.5B). AIQ has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: AIQ (22.926) vs CIBR (21.554). AIQ was incepted earlier than CIBR: AIQ (8 years) vs CIBR (11 years). CIBR (0.58) has a lower expense ratio than AIQ (0.68). CIBR has a higher turnover AIQ (15.52) vs AIQ (15.52).
AIQCIBRAIQ / CIBR
Gain YTD22.92621.554106%
Net Assets10.5B13.2B80%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.58117%
Turnover15.5221.0074%
Yield0.140.4630%
Fund Existence8 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIQCIBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NHYM25.06-0.02
-0.09%
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF
ABNG15.90-0.05
-0.29%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Abnb Daily ETF
DJUL49.70-0.21
-0.42%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Jul
NFRA65.20-0.39
-0.59%
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF
ITDF40.46-1.15
-2.78%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF

AIQ and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIQ has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIQ jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIQ
1D Price
Change %
AIQ100%
-8.15%
STM - AIQ
84%
Closely correlated
-9.75%
TSM - AIQ
71%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
MU - AIQ
66%
Loosely correlated
-13.25%
AMD - AIQ
65%
Loosely correlated
-10.86%
NVDA - AIQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.20%
More

CIBR and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBR
1D Price
Change %
CIBR100%
-4.41%
CRWD - CIBR
85%
Closely correlated
-6.68%
PANW - CIBR
79%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
OKTA - CIBR
79%
Closely correlated
-3.85%
TENB - CIBR
72%
Closely correlated
-4.92%
RBRK - CIBR
69%
Closely correlated
-4.66%
More