AIQ
Price
$64.32
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
10.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CIBR
Price
$94.59
Change
-$0.73 (-0.77%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
15.44B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AIQ vs CIBR

AIQ vs CIBR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) vs. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR)

Key Takeaways

  • AIQ tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index and offers broader exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) and big data companies across approximately 88-93 holdings, while CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with a narrower focus on cybersecurity firms and roughly 42-43 holdings.
  • Both ETFs employ passive, market-cap-weighted strategies but target distinct thematic niches within technology: AIQ emphasizes AI development, hardware, and data analytics, whereas CIBR concentrates on cybersecurity solutions and services.
  • AIQ carries a higher expense ratio of 0.68% compared to CIBR’s 0.58%, reflecting differences in index complexity and liquidity profiles.
  • AIQ typically features greater sector concentration in semiconductors and software, while CIBR allocates heavily to pure-play cybersecurity providers, resulting in differentiated risk exposures during sector rotations.
  • Structural characteristics position AIQ for broader thematic growth in AI adoption and CIBR for resilience amid rising digital threats and regulatory emphasis on data protection.
  • Both funds maintain transparent, rules-based rebalancing methodologies tied to their underlying indices, supporting consistent exposure without active management overlays.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted technology exposure increasingly evaluate thematic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that capture specialized growth areas. The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and the First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) provide complementary yet distinct avenues within the broader technology sector. AIQ delivers diversified access to companies leveraging or enabling artificial intelligence and big data, while CIBR focuses specifically on firms providing cybersecurity products and services. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as alternative strategies for investors pursuing innovation-driven or security-focused themes. In the current environment of accelerating digital transformation and evolving cyber risks, comparing their structural features, holdings, and positioning helps clarify how each fits different portfolio objectives.

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) Overview

The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) seeks to track the performance of the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. It is a passively managed, thematic ETF that invests in developed-market companies involved in the development and utilization of artificial intelligence and big data technologies, including hardware providers. The fund typically holds 88-93 securities and employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain index alignment. Top holdings often include technology leaders such as Palantir Technologies (PLTR), Microsoft (MSFT), and Oracle (ORCL), with significant allocations to semiconductors and software. Sector exposure centers on information technology, with meaningful weights in hardware and services supporting AI applications. AIQ maintains an expense ratio of 0.68% and offers investors broad thematic participation in AI-driven innovation.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. This passively managed, thematic ETF targets companies classified as cybersecurity providers within technology and industrial sectors. It generally contains 42-43 holdings and applies a market-capitalization-weighted approach with rules-based rebalancing. Prominent positions frequently feature Palo Alto Networks (PANW), Fortinet (FTNT), and CrowdStrike (CRWD), alongside established players like Cisco Systems (CSCO). Sector allocations emphasize information technology with a concentration in security software and services. CIBR carries an expense ratio of 0.58% and provides focused exposure to the cybersecurity theme.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the expansive technology sector, influenced by rapid digitalization, enterprise cloud adoption, and increasing regulatory scrutiny around data privacy and security. AI-related developments, including generative models and infrastructure buildout, serve as primary catalysts for AIQ, while escalating cyber threats and compliance requirements drive demand for CIBR’s holdings. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations and capital expenditure cycles affect both, though cybersecurity often exhibits defensive characteristics during uncertainty. Sector risks include valuation compression in high-growth names, supply-chain disruptions for hardware components, and evolving geopolitical tensions impacting technology supply chains. Capital flows into thematic technology strategies remain robust amid long-term structural shifts toward automation and secure digital ecosystems.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, AIQ has tended to exhibit higher sensitivity to AI-specific momentum and broader technology rotations, reflecting its wider exposure to growth-oriented semiconductor and software names. CIBR has shown comparatively steadier behavior tied to cybersecurity spending patterns, which often persist across economic environments due to ongoing threat landscapes. Relative positioning highlights AIQ’s greater potential volatility from concentrated AI themes versus CIBR’s more specialized focus, which may benefit from sustained enterprise security budgets. Both ETFs respond to earnings cycles of their top holdings and shifts in investor sentiment toward innovation versus resilience. Over broader timeframes, differences in diversification and thematic purity influence how each navigates sector rotations and macroeconomic adjustments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like AIQ and CIBR can leverage this platform to refine their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to CIBR. Its lower expense ratio, concentrated yet high-conviction cybersecurity holdings, and alignment with persistent security spending trends support a favorable risk-reward profile relative to AIQ’s broader but costlier AI exposure. Diversification differences and sector momentum tilt the assessment toward CIBR in the present environment, though outcomes remain probabilistic and dependent on evolving market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AIQ vs. CIBR commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIQ is a Buy and CIBR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 15.4B vs. AIQ (10.1B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than AIQ: CIBR (32.730) vs AIQ (26.465). AIQ was incepted earlier than CIBR: AIQ (8 years) vs CIBR (11 years). CIBR (0.58) has a lower expense ratio than AIQ (0.68). CIBR has a higher turnover AIQ (15.52) vs AIQ (15.52).
AIQCIBRAIQ / CIBR
Gain YTD26.46532.73081%
Net Assets10.1B15.4B66%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.58117%
Turnover15.5221.0074%
Yield0.070.3918%
Fund Existence8 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIQCIBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPO54.420.78
+1.46%
Renaissance IPO ETF
UDI37.64N/A
N/A
USCF Dividend Income ETF
DURA39.61-0.29
-0.74%
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF
IYH72.40-0.75
-1.03%
iShares US Healthcare ETF
IAK145.56-2.31
-1.56%
iShares US Insurance ETF