Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AIQ or QTUM or SMH
AIQ vs QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts AIQ vs QTUM vs SMH
Global X Artfcl Intlgc & Tech ETF
Price$41.95
Change-$0.37 (-0.87%)
Volume$2.6K
Net Assets3.47B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$261.54
Change+$4.55 (+1.77%)
Volume$40.74K
Net Assets24.96B
AIQ vs QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 25B vs. AIQ (3.47B) and QTUM (1.47B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than AIQ and SMH: QTUM (9.063) vs AIQ (8.514) and SMH (8.019). AIQ was incepted earlier than QTUM and SMH: AIQ (7 years) vs QTUM (7 years) and SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40) and AIQ (0.68). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) and AIQ (10.88) vs SMH (15.00) and AIQ (10.88).
| AIQ | QTUM | SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 8.514 | 9.063 | 8.019 |
| Net Assets | 3.47B | 1.47B | 25B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.35 |
| Turnover | 10.88 | 46.00 | 15.00 |
| Yield | 0.13 | 0.65 | 0.45 |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | 14 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AIQ | QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% | 19 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 82% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| TER - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AMAT - QTUM | 79% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||