These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer distinct approaches to technology and innovation themes, making them relevant for comparison in the current market environment. ARKQ pursues an active thematic strategy in autonomous technology and robotics. FMET tracks a specialized metaverse index, while XLK delivers passive exposure to the broad U.S. technology sector. They do not track identical indexes but represent varying strategic approaches to technology exposure, ranging from narrow thematic tilts to comprehensive sector coverage. Investors evaluating these funds can assess differences in cost, concentration, and thematic precision.
ARKQ is an actively managed ETF that seeks to invest at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of companies benefiting from autonomous technology and robotics themes. It does not track a specific index but follows ARK Invest's disruptive innovation framework. The fund typically holds 30-50 securities. Top holdings often include Tesla (TSLA), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Teradyne (TER), Rocket Lab (RKLB), and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS). Sector allocations emphasize Industrials, Information Technology, and Consumer Cyclical. The expense ratio is 0.75%. As an actively managed thematic vehicle, ARKQ features discretionary rebalancing and a focus on high-conviction positions in emerging technologies such as automation, artificial intelligence, and advanced manufacturing.
FMET is a passively managed ETF that tracks the Fidelity Metaverse Index, providing exposure to companies involved in metaverse development, implementation, and utilization. The fund holds approximately 50-60 securities in a market-capitalization-weighted structure. Representative top holdings include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), NVIDIA (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Apple (AAPL). Sector allocations are concentrated in Information Technology and Communication Services, with some Real Estate exposure. The expense ratio stands at approximately 0.39-0.40%. FMET employs standard index rebalancing and offers targeted thematic exposure to virtual reality, digital infrastructure, gaming, and related technologies without active stock selection.
XLK is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index, providing broad exposure to U.S. technology companies. The fund holds approximately 75 securities. Top holdings typically feature NVIDIA (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Broadcom (AVGO), and other major technology firms. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly Information Technology (approximately 99%), with minimal Communication Services exposure. The expense ratio is 0.08%. XLK uses a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to the underlying index and represents a low-cost, liquid vehicle for comprehensive technology sector participation.
The technology sector continues to experience capital inflows driven by advances in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, semiconductors, and digital transformation. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, supply chain developments, and regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms influence all three ETFs. Earnings growth among semiconductor and software leaders remains a key driver, while geopolitical tensions affecting global chip supply add volatility. Broader adoption of automation and virtual technologies supports thematic funds, though sector concentration introduces sensitivity to valuation multiples and economic cycles.
In recent market cycles, structural differences have influenced relative behavior. XLK's broad diversification across dozens of technology names has contributed to more stable trend consistency compared with more concentrated vehicles. ARKQ's active thematic approach and higher concentration have led to greater sensitivity to individual company developments and higher volatility in periods of sector rotation. FMET's metaverse-specific focus has resulted in performance patterns tied closely to hardware and software enablers of immersive technologies. Drawdowns have varied based on exposure breadth, with the lowest-cost, most diversified option demonstrating resilience during broader market stress. Performance differentials stem primarily from holdings concentration, expense drag, and the degree of thematic versus sector-wide exposure.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKQ, FMET, or XLK may find the tool useful for refining their research process.
Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favorability to XLK. Its combination of ultra-low expense ratio, broad holdings, high liquidity, and comprehensive technology sector coverage provides a durable foundation for long-term positioning relative to the higher-cost thematic alternatives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| ARKQ | FMET | XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 13.030 | 4.539 | 25.390 |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 47.7M | 118B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.39 | 0.08 |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 30.00 | 5.00 |
| Yield | 0.21 | 0.50 | 0.40 |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | 27 years |
| ARKQ | FMET | XLK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCO | 26.48 | 0.79 | +3.08% |
| ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | |||
| KSEP | 30.16 | -0.33 | -1.07% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Sep | |||
| KMAR | 31.12 | -0.52 | -1.64% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar | |||
| JUNZ | 34.86 | -0.65 | -1.83% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF | |||
| HSCZ | 42.54 | -0.80 | -1.85% |
| iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKQ has been closely correlated with ACHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKQ jumps, then ACHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARKQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKQ | 100% | -7.12% | ||
| ACHR - ARKQ | 75% Closely correlated | -13.17% | ||
| RKLB - ARKQ | 72% Closely correlated | -8.23% | ||
| JOBY - ARKQ | 71% Closely correlated | -14.27% | ||
| BWXT - ARKQ | 67% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| LUNR - ARKQ | 66% Closely correlated | -12.73% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMET has been loosely correlated with AMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMET jumps, then AMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMET | 100% | -5.54% | ||
| AMD - FMET | 66% Loosely correlated | -10.86% | ||
| GDS - FMET | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.13% | ||
| NVDA - FMET | 60% Loosely correlated | -6.20% | ||
| MPWR - FMET | 59% Loosely correlated | -10.38% | ||
| BILI - FMET | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.08% | ||
More | ||||