ARKW
Price
$139.47
Change
-$1.56 (-1.11%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:13 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ESPO
Price
$88.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 9, 11:47 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
239.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLK
Price
$178.59
Change
-$5.59 (-3.04%)
Updated
Jun 9, 12:36 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
117.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKW or ESPO or XLK

Header iconARKW vs ESPO vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts ARKW vs ESPO vs XLKBanner chart's image
ARKW vs ESPO vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) vs. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) vs. Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK)

Key Takeaways

  • ARKW is an actively managed thematic ETF focused on next-generation internet and disruptive innovation, with a higher expense ratio of 0.76% and typically 35–55 holdings.
  • ESPO offers passive exposure to the global video gaming and eSports theme through an index-tracking strategy, featuring a 0.55% expense ratio and a concentrated portfolio of approximately 26 holdings.
  • XLK provides broad, low-cost passive exposure to the U.S. technology sector via the Technology Select Sector Index, with an expense ratio of 0.08% and around 73–75 holdings.
  • Structural differences include ARKW’s active stock selection versus the index-based approaches of ESPO and XLK, resulting in varying levels of concentration and thematic specificity.
  • Cost efficiency favors XLK significantly, while thematic tilt is strongest in ARKW and ESPO, and diversification depth is greatest in XLK.
  • Risk profiles differ: ARKW and ESPO carry higher concentration risk due to fewer holdings and specialized themes, whereas XLK benefits from broader sector representation.

Introduction

ARKW, ESPO, and XLK represent distinct approaches to technology and innovation investing. ARKW employs active management to target next-generation internet themes, ESPO tracks a specialized global index for video gaming and eSports, and XLK delivers broad exposure to the U.S. technology sector. These ETFs do not track identical indexes but compete within overlapping technology and growth-oriented spaces, offering investors tiered risk exposures and strategic variations ranging from concentrated thematic bets to diversified sector participation.

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) Overview

The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an actively managed thematic fund seeking long-term capital appreciation by investing in companies driving innovation in next-generation internet technologies. It does not track a specific index. The fund typically holds 35–55 positions, with notable concentration in top holdings such as Advanced Micro Devices and Tesla. Sector allocations emphasize technology and consumer discretionary areas. Its expense ratio stands at 0.76%. Distinguishing features include ARK Invest’s active research-driven selection process and focus on disruptive innovation themes.

VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) Overview

The VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is a passive ETF designed to track the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index before fees and expenses. It holds approximately 26 securities, with top holdings concentrated in companies such as NetEase, Electronic Arts, and Tencent. Allocations center on communication services and related sectors tied to gaming and esports. The expense ratio is 0.55%. Key characteristics include its rules-based index methodology and targeted exposure to the global video gaming ecosystem.

Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) Overview

The Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is a passive fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It typically contains 73–75 holdings, led by major technology firms such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. Sector exposure is overwhelmingly in technology, with minor allocations elsewhere. The expense ratio is 0.08%. Distinguishing elements include its broad market-cap-weighted structure, high liquidity, and role as a core technology sector building block.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector continues to experience capital inflows driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital entertainment. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trends and earnings growth among large-cap technology companies influence all three ETFs. Regulatory developments around data privacy, antitrust scrutiny, and content moderation, along with geopolitical tensions affecting global supply chains, represent ongoing sector risks. Earnings momentum in hardware, software, and gaming segments supports thematic interest, while broader market cycles affect risk appetite for concentrated versus diversified exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, XLK has demonstrated more stable trend consistency due to its broad diversification and lower volatility profile compared with the more concentrated ARKW and ESPO. ARKW’s active approach can lead to greater sensitivity to momentum shifts in innovation themes, while ESPO’s gaming focus introduces exposure to consumer discretionary spending patterns. Drawdowns may vary based on concentration risk, with XLK generally exhibiting lower sensitivity to single-theme disruptions. Performance differences stem from structural variations: active selection in ARKW versus index replication in ESPO and XLK, and sector breadth in XLK versus thematic specificity in the others.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKW, ESPO, and XLK can leverage this platform for efficient market analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, momentum stability, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favorable relative positioning to XLK. Its low expense ratio, broad holdings, and sector-wide exposure provide a balanced foundation less susceptible to concentration-driven volatility, though individual investor objectives may favor the thematic specificity of ARKW or ESPO in certain environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 118B vs. ARKW (1.64B) and ESPO (239M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than ARKW and ESPO: XLK (28.088) vs ARKW (-4.529) and ESPO (-14.869). ARKW was incepted earlier than ESPO and XLK: ARKW (12 years) vs ESPO (8 years) and XLK (28 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than ESPO (0.55) and ARKW (0.76). ESPO has a higher turnover ARKW (44.00) and XLK (5.00) vs ARKW (44.00) and XLK (5.00).
ARKWESPOXLK
Gain YTD-4.529-14.86928.088
Net Assets1.64B239M118B
Total Expense Ratio0.760.550.08
Turnover44.0053.005.00
Yield1.531.440.40
Fund Existence12 years8 years28 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKWESPOXLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARKW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFLV39.250.12
+0.31%
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
MMSD25.31N/A
-0.02%
Nyli Mackay Muni Short Duration ETF
BLW12.24-0.02
-0.16%
Blackrock Limited
CHAU22.40-0.44
-1.93%
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF
SETH55.65-4.12
-6.89%
ProShares Short Ether ETF

ARKW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKW has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKW jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKW
1D Price
Change %
ARKW100%
+2.25%
COIN - ARKW
81%
Closely correlated
+6.37%
HOOD - ARKW
76%
Closely correlated
+3.12%
PLTR - ARKW
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
OPEN - ARKW
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
ROKU - ARKW
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More

ESPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESPO has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESPO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESPO
1D Price
Change %
ESPO100%
+0.10%
NVDA - ESPO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
U - ESPO
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
NTES - ESPO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
SF - ESPO
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
BILI - ESPO
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
More

XLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLK
1D Price
Change %
XLK100%
+2.15%
NOW - XLK
97%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
QRVO - XLK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
MA - XLK
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
V - XLK
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
BR - XLK
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More