BABA
Price
$112.82
Change
+$0.13 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
269.91B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PDD
Price
$81.56
Change
+$0.26 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
116.09B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VIPS
Price
$13.92
Change
+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.69B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BABA or PDD or VIPS

Header iconBABA vs PDD vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts BABA vs PDD vs VIPSBanner chart's image
BABA vs PDD vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) vs. PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) vs. Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BABA, PDD, and VIPS represent distinct segments of China’s e-commerce sector, with BABA offering broad platform scale, PDD focusing on value-driven retail, and VIPS emphasizing premium discount sales.
  • Recent market activity shows BABA experiencing volatility tied to earnings and macroeconomic factors, while PDD has faced steeper year-to-date declines amid competitive pressures.
  • VIPS has demonstrated relative resilience in year-to-date returns compared with its peers, supported by steady operational performance ahead of upcoming quarterly results.
  • Valuation sensitivity varies, with PDD and VIPS appearing more compressed on certain multiples than BABA, reflecting differences in growth profiles and market positioning.
  • Sector exposure to consumer spending and regulatory developments in China remains a common thread influencing relative performance across all three stocks.
  • Market sentiment has shifted with broader economic signals, creating trade-offs in stability versus potential catalysts for each name.

Introduction

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD), and Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) are three prominent publicly traded companies operating within China’s dynamic consumer internet and retail landscape. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, business models, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating exposure to this sector. Market participants focused on growth-oriented equities, value opportunities, or thematic bets on Chinese consumption may find the analysis useful for understanding performance differentials and risk considerations in the current environment.

BABA Overview and Recent Performance

Alibaba Group Holding Limited operates as a diversified technology conglomerate with core interests in e-commerce platforms, cloud computing, and digital payments. In recent weeks, BABA has shown price fluctuations influenced by quarterly earnings results and broader macroeconomic developments, including trade-related tensions. The stock has posted mixed returns, with year-to-date performance reflecting a modest decline amid volatility in trading volumes. Sentiment has been shaped by updates on cloud segment expansion and adjustments in international operations, contributing to a cautious market tone during the period.

PDD Overview and Recent Performance

PDD Holdings Inc. runs an online retail platform emphasizing affordable goods and social commerce features. Over the recent period, PDD has encountered downward price pressure, with year-to-date results showing a notable decline relative to broader market benchmarks. Factors affecting performance include competitive dynamics in the value retail segment and ongoing regulatory considerations in its primary market. Trading activity has reflected measured investor responses to earnings projections and margin trends, maintaining a neutral-to-cautious outlook in recent market sessions.

VIPS Overview and Recent Performance

Vipshop Holdings Limited specializes in flash sales of branded merchandise through an online platform. In recent market activity, VIPS has displayed comparatively steadier price action, with positive year-to-date returns despite shorter-term fluctuations ahead of its first-quarter 2026 earnings release scheduled for May 21. Operational consistency in its discount retail model has supported sentiment, while the stock remains sensitive to consumer spending patterns and sector-wide developments.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of automated trading strategies drawn from hundreds of AI trading bots that cover thousands of tickers across global markets. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing conditions earn placement in this focused section, where users can review varied trading styles, timeframes, and performance statistics. Available bots span a wide range of metrics, including win rates typically between 55% and 75% and differing risk profiles suited to diverse market environments. All strategies maintain distinct approaches to entry signals, position sizing, and exit rules. Explore the full collection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify options matching specific objectives.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models differ markedly: BABA leverages an expansive ecosystem spanning retail, logistics, and technology services, whereas PDD prioritizes high-volume, low-price transactions and VIPS targets curated discount offerings. Growth drivers include cloud and AI initiatives at BABA, scale advantages at PDD, and inventory efficiency at VIPS. Recent momentum has favored VIPS on a year-to-date basis, while BABA and PDD contend with greater compression amid earnings variability and competitive intensity. Risk factors encompass regulatory exposure common to all three and varying degrees of valuation sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts. Market sentiment reflects trade-offs between BABA’s diversification, PDD’s growth trajectory, and VIPS’s operational stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning ahead of catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to VIPS within this trio, owing to its steadier recent returns and upcoming earnings visibility. BABA and PDD present balanced but more variable profiles influenced by broader sector dynamics. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BABA: $112.82PDD: $81.56VIPS: $13.92)
Brand notoriety: BABA, PDD and VIPS are all notable
The three companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BABA: 73%, PDD: 68%, VIPS: 121%
Market capitalization -- BABA: $269.91B, PDD: $116.09B, VIPS: $6.69B
$BABA is valued at $269.91B, while PDD has a market capitalization of $116.09B, and VIPS's market capitalization is $6.69B. The market cap for tickers in this @Internet Retail ranges from $2.57T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Internet Retail industry is $85.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BABA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePDD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and VIPS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BABA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PDD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VIPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BABA and VIPS are a better buy in the long-term than PDD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BABA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and VIPS’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BABA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PDD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VIPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PDD is a better buy in the short-term than BABA and VIPS.

Price Growth

BABA (@Internet Retail) experienced а -5.95% price change this week, while PDD (@Internet Retail) price change was -4.13% , and VIPS (@Internet Retail) price fluctuated +2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BABA is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2026.

PDD is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

VIPS is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-0.20% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BABA($270B) has a higher market cap than PDD($116B) and VIPS($6.69B). BABA has higher P/E ratio than PDD and VIPS: BABA (17.37) vs PDD (8.56) and VIPS (6.33). VIPS YTD gains are higher at: -18.044 vs. BABA (-22.325) and PDD (-28.071). BABA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 186B vs. PDD (121B) and VIPS (9.27B). BABA has higher revenues than PDD and VIPS: BABA (1.02T) vs PDD (442B) and VIPS (106B).
BABAPDDVIPS
Capitalization270B116B6.69B
EBITDA186B121B9.27B
Gain YTD-22.325-28.071-18.044
P/E Ratio17.378.566.33
Revenue1.02T442B106B
Total CashN/A436B30.3B
Total DebtN/A5.12B7.17B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BABA vs PDD vs VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
BABA
PDD
VIPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
546115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100100
SMR RATING
1..100
713847
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
788073
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
427371
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIPS's Valuation (7) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as BABA (28) in the Internet Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PDD (72) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that VIPS's stock grew similarly to BABA’s and somewhat faster than PDD’s over the last 12 months.

VIPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as BABA (100) in the Internet Retail industry, and is in the same range as PDD (100) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that VIPS's stock grew similarly to BABA’s and similarly to PDD’s over the last 12 months.

PDD's SMR Rating (38) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as VIPS (47) in the Internet Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BABA (71) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PDD's stock grew similarly to VIPS’s and somewhat faster than BABA’s over the last 12 months.

VIPS's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as BABA (78) in the Internet Retail industry, and is in the same range as PDD (80) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that VIPS's stock grew similarly to BABA’s and similarly to PDD’s over the last 12 months.

BABA's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as VIPS (71) in the Internet Retail industry, and is in the same range as PDD (73) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that BABA's stock grew similarly to VIPS’s and similarly to PDD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BABAPDDVIPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BABA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PDD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CKB.X0.0011430.000032
+2.92%
Nervos Network cryptocurrency
PEPE.X0.000003N/A
+1.91%
Pepe cryptocurrency
SPELL.X0.0001230.000001
+1.12%
Spell Token cryptocurrency
UTK.X0.0079470.000001
+0.01%
Utrust cryptocurrency
FOR.X0.000063N/A
-0.10%
ForTube cryptocurrency

PDD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDD has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDD jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PDD
1D Price
Change %
PDD100%
+0.32%
JD - PDD
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
BABA - PDD
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
VIPS - PDD
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
BZUN - PDD
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
BBBY - PDD
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
More

VIPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIPS
1D Price
Change %
VIPS100%
+0.22%
JD - VIPS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
BABA - VIPS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
PDD - VIPS
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
SE - VIPS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
CVNA - VIPS
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.49%
More