Advertisement
BAP or FLIC or HAFC
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLIC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and HAFC’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FLIC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and HAFC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.21% price change this week, while FLIC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% , and HAFC (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +4.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
FLIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
HAFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.39% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BAP | FLIC | HAFC | |
| Capitalization | 13.5B | 249M | 469M |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 25.637 | 3.426 | 2.243 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.41 | 9.28 | 5.92 |
| Revenue | 21.6B | 93M | 250M |
| Total Cash | N/A | 45.8M | 78.8M |
| Total Debt | 25.4B | 567M | 455M |
BAP | FLIC | HAFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 33 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 82 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 15 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 55 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 11 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 4 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLIC's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (39) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAP (89). This means that FLIC's stock grew similarly to HAFC’s and somewhat faster than BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (27) and is somewhat better than the same rating for FLIC (82). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to HAFC’s and somewhat faster than FLIC’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's SMR Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (11) and is in the same range as FLIC (15). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to HAFC’s and similarly to FLIC’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (46) and is in the same range as FLIC (55). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to HAFC’s and similarly to FLIC’s over the last 12 months.
FLIC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (12) and is in the same range as BAP (37). This means that FLIC's stock grew similarly to HAFC’s and similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | FLIC | HAFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 13 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 13 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 13 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 13 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 13 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 66% | 21 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 13 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
BAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| BSAC - BAP | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| IFS - BAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| BCH - BAP | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| SBNY - BAP | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GGAL - BAP | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||
FLIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLIC has been closely correlated with CNOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLIC jumps, then CNOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLIC | 100% | N/A | ||
| CNOB - FLIC | 94% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| TOWN - FLIC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| FRME - FLIC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| BHLB - FLIC | 86% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| TRMK - FLIC | 86% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||
HAFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAFC | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| TRMK - HAFC | 84% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| TCBK - HAFC | 84% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| HOPE - HAFC | 84% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| UBSI - HAFC | 84% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| ABCB - HAFC | 83% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||