Investors seeking exposure to critical minerals and the energy transition often evaluate BATT, COPX, and PICK together because they address overlapping yet distinct segments of the metals and mining universe. These ETFs do not track identical indexes; instead, they represent tiered approaches to the same broad theme of electrification and industrial metals demand. BATT focuses narrowly on lithium and battery technology, COPX isolates copper miners, and PICK spans diversified metals and mining producers excluding precious metals. Comparing them helps clarify trade-offs in thematic purity, diversification, cost, and positioning within current macroeconomic and regulatory environments.
BATT seeks to track the EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index, which selects global companies deriving significant revenue from lithium battery technologies, including battery storage, metals and materials, and electric vehicles. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings typically include Contemporary Amperex Technology, BHP Group, Tesla, BYD, and Freeport-McMoRan. Sector allocations concentrate in materials, industrials, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. As a thematic, rules-based ETF, BATT emphasizes companies with at least 50% revenue exposure to the lithium battery ecosystem and caps certain industry weights to manage concentration.
COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, providing passive exposure to companies involved in copper exploration, mining, and production. The ETF maintains around 40 holdings with market-capitalization weighting and semi-annual rebalancing. Prominent positions often feature BHP Group, Teck Resources, Hudbay Minerals, Southern Copper, and First Quantum Minerals. The portfolio allocates overwhelmingly to the materials sector. The expense ratio is 0.65%. COPX is designed as a pure-play vehicle for copper supply-chain dynamics, capturing both developed and emerging market miners without broader metals diversification.
PICK follows the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, offering broad passive exposure to global companies engaged in diversified metals, aluminum, steel, and other mining activities excluding gold and silver. The fund holds more than 300 securities with market-capitalization weighting and quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings commonly include BHP Group, Rio Tinto, Freeport-McMoRan, Glencore, and Vale. Sector exposure centers on materials with meaningful allocations to steel and diversified mining. The expense ratio is the lowest among the three at 0.39%. PICK’s wide diversification across developed and emerging markets reduces single-commodity or single-company risk relative to more focused peers.
The critical minerals sector faces sustained structural demand from electrification, renewable energy infrastructure, and electric vehicle adoption. Capital flows into copper, lithium, and other battery metals have accelerated amid policy support for domestic supply chains in the United States and Europe. Regulatory shifts emphasizing responsible sourcing and reduced reliance on concentrated suppliers continue to influence investment patterns. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect commodity price volatility tied to global industrial production and inventory cycles. Geopolitical factors, including trade policies and mining jurisdiction risks, add layers of uncertainty. Sector risks encompass environmental permitting delays, labor disruptions, and potential oversupply in certain metals during economic slowdowns.
In recent market cycles, performance differentials among the three ETFs have stemmed primarily from exposure concentration and commodity specificity. BATT has shown higher sensitivity to lithium price swings and electric vehicle demand fluctuations, resulting in greater volatility during periods of battery metal oversupply. COPX has tracked copper price movements closely, exhibiting pronounced moves tied to infrastructure spending announcements and supply disruptions. PICK’s broader holdings have delivered more stable trend consistency and lower drawdowns in mixed metals environments due to diversification across steel, aluminum, and multiple base metals. Relative volatility remains highest for the concentrated thematic funds, while PICK’s structure supports better risk-adjusted positioning across varying macroeconomic regimes.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover data-driven opportunities across sectors.
Based on observable structural characteristics, PICK demonstrates the strongest combination of diversification depth, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted positioning among the three ETFs. Its broad holdings and lowest expense ratio provide a more resilient framework across commodity cycles compared with the narrower thematic concentrations of BATT and COPX. While BATT and COPX may appeal to investors seeking specific lithium or copper tilts, the probabilistic edge currently favors PICK for investors prioritizing stability and breadth within the metals and mining theme.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BATT | COPX | PICK | |
| Gain YTD | 12.576 | 26.714 | 27.789 |
| Net Assets | 123M | 8.12B | 2.61B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.39 |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 21.67 | 10.00 |
| Yield | 1.61 | 2.07 | 2.03 |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | 15 years |
| BATT | COPX | PICK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KMAR | 32.44 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar | |||
| PAI | 11.86 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Western Asset Investment Grade Income Fund | |||
| PFFA | 20.96 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF | |||
| BCD | 38.65 | -0.14 | -0.36% |
| abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF | |||
| STSM | 16.98 | -1.07 | -5.93% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Short TSM ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.05% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.45% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.20% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| ENS - BATT | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| BHP - COPX | 83% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| WDS - COPX | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NEXA - COPX | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TKO - COPX | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
| MTAL - COPX | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PICK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| BHP - PICK | 90% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| RIO - PICK | 89% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| MT - PICK | 72% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| CMP - PICK | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| LAR - PICK | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||