BATT
Price
$15.54
Change
-$0.16 (-1.02%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
123.47M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COPX
Price
$90.66
Change
-$0.59 (-0.65%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
8.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PICK
Price
$65.06
Change
-$0.12 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
2.61B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BATT or COPX or PICK

BATT vs COPX vs PICK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) vs. Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK)

Key Takeaways

  • BATT offers targeted exposure to lithium battery technology and electric vehicle supply chains through an actively selected thematic basket of approximately 50 holdings, with an expense ratio of 0.59%.
  • COPX provides concentrated access to global copper mining companies via a passive index of roughly 40 holdings and carries a higher expense ratio of 0.65%.
  • PICK delivers the broadest diversification across global metals and mining producers (excluding gold and silver) with over 300 holdings and the lowest expense ratio at 0.39%.
  • Structural differences in thematic focus, concentration levels, and costs create distinct risk-return profiles suited to varying investor objectives within the critical minerals sector.
  • PICK stands out for cost efficiency and breadth, while BATT and COPX emphasize specific battery and copper supply-chain themes respectively.
  • All three ETFs share sensitivity to industrial metals demand, electrification trends, and commodity price cycles but differ in rebalancing frequency and geographic exposure depth.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to critical minerals and the energy transition often evaluate BATT, COPX, and PICK together because they address overlapping yet distinct segments of the metals and mining universe. These ETFs do not track identical indexes; instead, they represent tiered approaches to the same broad theme of electrification and industrial metals demand. BATT focuses narrowly on lithium and battery technology, COPX isolates copper miners, and PICK spans diversified metals and mining producers excluding precious metals. Comparing them helps clarify trade-offs in thematic purity, diversification, cost, and positioning within current macroeconomic and regulatory environments.

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) Overview

BATT seeks to track the EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index, which selects global companies deriving significant revenue from lithium battery technologies, including battery storage, metals and materials, and electric vehicles. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings typically include Contemporary Amperex Technology, BHP Group, Tesla, BYD, and Freeport-McMoRan. Sector allocations concentrate in materials, industrials, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. As a thematic, rules-based ETF, BATT emphasizes companies with at least 50% revenue exposure to the lithium battery ecosystem and caps certain industry weights to manage concentration.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, providing passive exposure to companies involved in copper exploration, mining, and production. The ETF maintains around 40 holdings with market-capitalization weighting and semi-annual rebalancing. Prominent positions often feature BHP Group, Teck Resources, Hudbay Minerals, Southern Copper, and First Quantum Minerals. The portfolio allocates overwhelmingly to the materials sector. The expense ratio is 0.65%. COPX is designed as a pure-play vehicle for copper supply-chain dynamics, capturing both developed and emerging market miners without broader metals diversification.

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) Overview

PICK follows the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, offering broad passive exposure to global companies engaged in diversified metals, aluminum, steel, and other mining activities excluding gold and silver. The fund holds more than 300 securities with market-capitalization weighting and quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings commonly include BHP Group, Rio Tinto, Freeport-McMoRan, Glencore, and Vale. Sector exposure centers on materials with meaningful allocations to steel and diversified mining. The expense ratio is the lowest among the three at 0.39%. PICK’s wide diversification across developed and emerging markets reduces single-commodity or single-company risk relative to more focused peers.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The critical minerals sector faces sustained structural demand from electrification, renewable energy infrastructure, and electric vehicle adoption. Capital flows into copper, lithium, and other battery metals have accelerated amid policy support for domestic supply chains in the United States and Europe. Regulatory shifts emphasizing responsible sourcing and reduced reliance on concentrated suppliers continue to influence investment patterns. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect commodity price volatility tied to global industrial production and inventory cycles. Geopolitical factors, including trade policies and mining jurisdiction risks, add layers of uncertainty. Sector risks encompass environmental permitting delays, labor disruptions, and potential oversupply in certain metals during economic slowdowns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, performance differentials among the three ETFs have stemmed primarily from exposure concentration and commodity specificity. BATT has shown higher sensitivity to lithium price swings and electric vehicle demand fluctuations, resulting in greater volatility during periods of battery metal oversupply. COPX has tracked copper price movements closely, exhibiting pronounced moves tied to infrastructure spending announcements and supply disruptions. PICK’s broader holdings have delivered more stable trend consistency and lower drawdowns in mixed metals environments due to diversification across steel, aluminum, and multiple base metals. Relative volatility remains highest for the concentrated thematic funds, while PICK’s structure supports better risk-adjusted positioning across varying macroeconomic regimes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover data-driven opportunities across sectors.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, PICK demonstrates the strongest combination of diversification depth, cost efficiency, and risk-adjusted positioning among the three ETFs. Its broad holdings and lowest expense ratio provide a more resilient framework across commodity cycles compared with the narrower thematic concentrations of BATT and COPX. While BATT and COPX may appeal to investors seeking specific lithium or copper tilts, the probabilistic edge currently favors PICK for investors prioritizing stability and breadth within the metals and mining theme.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.12B vs. PICK (2.61B) and BATT (123M). PICK and COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: PICK (27.789) and COPX (26.714) vs BATT (12.576). BATT was incepted earlier than COPX and PICK: BATT (8 years) vs COPX (16 years) and PICK (15 years). PICK (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59) and COPX (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) and PICK (10.00) vs COPX (21.67) and PICK (10.00).
BATTCOPXPICK
Gain YTD12.57626.71427.789
Net Assets123M8.12B2.61B
Total Expense Ratio0.590.650.39
Turnover73.0021.6710.00
Yield1.612.072.03
Fund Existence8 years16 years15 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BATTCOPXPICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BATT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PICK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMAR32.44N/A
N/A
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Mar
PAI11.86-0.01
-0.08%
Western Asset Investment Grade Income Fund
PFFA20.96-0.03
-0.14%
Virtus InfraCap US Preferred Stock ETF
BCD38.65-0.14
-0.36%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF
STSM16.98-1.07
-5.93%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short TSM ETF

BATT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BATT
1D Price
Change %
BATT100%
-1.05%
BHP - BATT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
ALB - BATT
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.45%
SQM - BATT
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.20%
NIU - BATT
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
ENS - BATT
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
-0.65%
BHP - COPX
83%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
TKO - COPX
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
MTAL - COPX
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PICK has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PICK jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PICK
1D Price
Change %
PICK100%
-0.18%
BHP - PICK
90%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
RIO - PICK
89%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MT - PICK
72%
Closely correlated
+3.51%
CMP - PICK
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
LAR - PICK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More