BCC
Price
$86.50
Change
+$1.38 (+1.62%)
Updated
Jun 3, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.07B
62 days until earnings call
CC
Price
$9.87
Change
+$0.46 (+4.89%)
Updated
Jun 3, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.91B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs CC

Header iconBCC vs CC Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs CCBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$86.50
Change+$1.38 (+1.62%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.07B
Chemours Company (The)
Price$9.87
Change+$0.46 (+4.89%)
Volume$4.39K
Capitalization3.91B
BCC vs CC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. CC commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Buy and CC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $85.12 vs. CC: $9.40)
Brand notoriety: BCC: Not notable vs. CC: Notable
BCC represents the Construction Materials, while CC is part of the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 96% vs. CC: 196%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $6.07B vs. CC: $3.91B
BCC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $6.07B. CC’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCC is a better buy in the long-term than CC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CC is a better buy in the short-term than BCC.

Price Growth

BCC (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while CC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -8.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

CC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.04% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.38% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCC($6.07B) has a higher market cap than CC($3.91B). BCC has higher P/E ratio than CC: BCC (12.62) vs CC (11.93). BCC YTD gains are higher at: -28.072 vs. CC (-42.997). BCC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 806M vs. CC (197M). CC has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. BCC (950M). BCC has less debt than CC: BCC (530M) vs CC (4.3B). BCC has higher revenues than CC: BCC (6.84B) vs CC (6.03B).
BCCCCBCC / CC
Capitalization6.07B3.91B155%
EBITDA806M197M409%
Gain YTD-28.072-42.99765%
P/E Ratio12.6211.93106%
Revenue6.84B6.03B113%
Total Cash950M1.2B79%
Total Debt530M4.3B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs CC: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
CC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8592
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CC's Valuation (6) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as BCC (16) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CC’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CC (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's SMR Rating (100) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as CC (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's Price Growth Rating (85) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as CC (92) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as CC (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to CC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDCAD1.37N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Canadian Dollar
MSAWX20.61N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp C
CHFCAD1.67N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Canadian Dollar
EURGBP0.84N/A
N/A
Euro - United Kingdom Pound
JPYCAD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Canadian Dollar

BCC and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCC
1D Price
Change %
BCC100%
-1.79%
EXP - BCC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
KNF - BCC
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
MLM - BCC
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
VMC - BCC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
TGLS - BCC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More

CC and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CC has been closely correlated with TROX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CC jumps, then TROX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CC
1D Price
Change %
CC100%
-7.21%
TROX - CC
72%
Closely correlated
-5.28%
OLN - CC
70%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
AXTA - CC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
AVNT - CC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
PPG - CC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More