BE
Price
$263.61
Change
-$27.76 (-9.53%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
74.98B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CSIQ
Price
$17.16
Change
-$2.31 (-11.86%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCEL
Price
$17.33
Change
-$4.07 (-19.02%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
918.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BE or CSIQ or FCEL

Header iconBE vs CSIQ vs FCEL Comparison
Open Charts BE vs CSIQ vs FCELBanner chart's image
BE vs CSIQ vs FCEL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bloom Energy (BE) vs. Canadian Solar (CSIQ) vs. FuelCell Energy (FCEL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Bloom Energy (BE) has delivered exceptional year-to-date performance exceeding 200%, fueled by robust Q1 2026 revenue growth of 130% year-over-year and AI data center demand.
  • FuelCell Energy (FCEL) shows strong momentum with over 150% YTD gains, driven by data center power initiatives and recent stock surges amid clean energy sector rallies.
  • Canadian Solar (CSIQ) lags with negative YTD returns around -15%, reflecting profitability challenges despite solid module shipments and U.S. manufacturing expansions.
  • All three operate in renewables—BE and FCEL via fuel cells, CSIQ via solar—but BE leads in market cap (~$84B) and stability.
  • Recent volatility is high across the board, with fuel cell peers BE and FCEL benefiting from AI-driven power needs, while CSIQ faces solar market pressures.
  • Analyst sentiment favors BE with "Buy" ratings and raised targets, contrasting FCEL's "Hold" and CSIQ's mixed outlook.

Introduction

Bloom Energy (BE), Canadian Solar (CSIQ), and FuelCell Energy (FCEL) represent key players in the renewable energy sector, focusing on fuel cells and solar technologies amid rising demand for clean power solutions. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing short-term momentum in AI data center infrastructure and investors seeking exposure to sustainable energy growth drivers. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in performance, with fuel cell providers gaining from on-site power needs while solar faces supply dynamics. Understanding their relative positioning aids in evaluating sector trade-offs in the current environment.

BE Overview and Recent Performance

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) designs, manufactures, and deploys solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation, serving data centers, industrial sites, and utilities with fuel-flexible solutions using natural gas, biogas, or hydrogen. In recent market activity, BE stock has surged over 200% year-to-date, propelled by record Q1 2026 revenue of $751 million, up 130% year-over-year, with product revenue soaring 208%. Strong demand from AI data centers, including an expanded Oracle partnership for up to 2.8 GW, has boosted sentiment, alongside raised full-year guidance to $3.4–$3.8 billion in revenue. Analysts have lifted price targets, with Barclays at $254, reflecting ~80% growth expectations. A $6 billion product backlog underscores visibility, though high volatility persists amid rapid appreciation.

CSIQ Overview and Recent Performance

Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) manufactures solar photovoltaic modules, provides battery storage solutions, and develops utility-scale projects through its CSI Solar and Recurrent Energy segments. Recent weeks have seen volatile trading for CSIQ, down ~15% year-to-date but up over 50% in the past month amid U.S. manufacturing ramps and Q1 2026 results showing $1.1 billion revenue at the high end of guidance, with 2.5 GW module and 2.1 GWh storage shipments. Challenges include prior Q4 2025 losses and weak solar shipments, offset by tariff refunds boosting margins and a new CEO appointment. A $3.6 billion e-STORAGE backlog and Mesquite, Texas factory expansion to 10 GW support positioning, though profitability pressures and high short interest (~35%) temper sentiment.

FCEL Overview and Recent Performance

FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL) develops carbonate fuel cell platforms for ultra-clean power, hydrogen production, and carbon capture, targeting utilities, data centers, and industrial applications. FCEL has exhibited explosive momentum, up over 150% year-to-date and ~100% in recent months, hitting new 52-week highs amid sector rallies. Q1 2026 revenue grew versus prior year, beating EPS estimates despite missing top-line, with a stabilized $1.17 billion backlog and data center focus—like a 12.5 MW power block and AI partnerships—driving optimism. High beta (~2.2) reflects volatility, as shares surged on clean energy hype but remain unprofitable with analyst targets around $8.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots leverage advanced machine learning for pattern recognition, sector rotation, and momentum trading, with standout performers delivering annualized returns up to 227%, win rates of 70–80%, and profit factors exceeding 2.5–3.0 in sectors like energy, technology, and oil. Only those excelling in current conditions—such as AI-driven power demand—earn a spot, offering transparency via backtested stats, live performance, and risk metrics. Traders can explore or copy these for automated execution. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover bots suited to today's market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Bloom Energy (BE), Canadian Solar (CSIQ), and FuelCell Energy (FCEL) share renewable exposure but diverge in models: BE and FCEL emphasize fuel cells for reliable on-site power, ideal for data centers, while CSIQ focuses on solar modules and storage amid global oversupply risks. Growth drivers favor fuel cells, with BE's AI catalysts and $20 billion backlog outpacing FCEL's $1.17 billion and CSIQ's project delays. Recent momentum is strongest for BE (200%+ YTD) and FCEL (150%+), versus CSIQ's -15%. Risks include FCEL and CSIQ's losses, high volatility (betas ~2.2 and 1.44), and valuation sensitivity—BE's scale yields profitability. Sentiment tilts to BE via upgrades, with all sensitive to policy and commodity shifts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors Bloom Energy (BE) due to superior trend consistency, Q1 profitability, expansive backlog, and leadership in AI data center deployments. While FCEL shows high momentum and CSIQ offers solar diversification, BE's relative stability and catalysts position it probabilistically stronger in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2026
Stock price -- (BE: $263.61CSIQ: $17.16FCEL: $17.33)
Brand notoriety: BE, CSIQ and FCEL are all notable
BE and FCEL are part of the Electrical Products industry, and CSIQ is in the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BE: 113%, CSIQ: 118%, FCEL: 122%
Market capitalization -- BE: $74.98B, CSIQ: $1.16B, FCEL: $918.11M
$BE [@Electrical Products] is valued at $74.98B. $FCEL’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $ $918.11M. $CSIQ [@Alternative Power Generation] has a market capitalization of $ $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $ $300.34B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $ $118.24B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $ $6.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $ $3.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSIQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and FCEL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CSIQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BE and CSIQ are a better buy in the long-term than FCEL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BE’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSIQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and FCEL’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CSIQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FCEL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSIQ and FCEL are a better buy in the short-term than BE.

Price Growth

BE (@Electrical Products) experienced а -7.51% price change this week, while CSIQ (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -9.64% , and FCEL (@Electrical Products) price fluctuated -19.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +7.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.59%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -10.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

BE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

CSIQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+7.12% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

@Alternative Power Generation (-10.42% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BE($75B) has a higher market cap than CSIQ($1.16B) and FCEL($918M). BE has higher P/E ratio than CSIQ and FCEL: BE (1841.88) vs CSIQ (20.09) and FCEL (). BE YTD gains are higher at: 203.384 vs. FCEL (137.073) and CSIQ (-27.808). CSIQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. BE (113M) and FCEL (-133.4M). BE has more cash in the bank: 2.49B vs. CSIQ (1.44B) and FCEL (312M). FCEL has less debt than BE and CSIQ: FCEL (163M) vs BE (2.95B) and CSIQ (7.81B). CSIQ has higher revenues than BE and FCEL: CSIQ (5.48B) vs BE (2.45B) and FCEL (170M).
BECSIQFCEL
Capitalization75B1.16B918M
EBITDA113M154M-133.4M
Gain YTD203.384-27.808137.073
P/E Ratio1841.8820.09N/A
Revenue2.45B5.48B170M
Total Cash2.49B1.44B312M
Total Debt2.95B7.81B163M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BE vs CSIQ vs FCEL: Fundamental Ratings
BE
CSIQ
FCEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
622672
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100100
SMR RATING
1..100
919498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
344935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCEL's Valuation (36) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CSIQ (39) in the Electrical Products industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BE (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FCEL's stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s and somewhat faster than BE’s over the last 12 months.

BE's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCEL (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CSIQ (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that BE's stock grew significantly faster than FCEL’s and significantly faster than CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.

BE's SMR Rating (91) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (94) in the Electrical Products industry, and is in the same range as FCEL (98) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that BE's stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s and similarly to FCEL’s over the last 12 months.

BE's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as FCEL (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as CSIQ (49) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that BE's stock grew similarly to FCEL’s and similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.

CSIQ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as BE (9) in the Electrical Products industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for FCEL (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSIQ's stock grew similarly to BE’s and significantly faster than FCEL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BECSIQFCEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CSIQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESAB87.95-0.36
-0.41%
ESAB Corp
MNTK1.66-0.04
-2.35%
Montauk Renewables
AKTX15.07-0.77
-4.86%
Akari Therapeutics Plc
AEM163.66-13.09
-7.41%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd
CSIQ17.16-2.31
-11.86%
Canadian Solar

CSIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSIQ
1D Price
Change %
CSIQ100%
-11.86%
JKS - CSIQ
58%
Loosely correlated
-8.94%
FCEL - CSIQ
54%
Loosely correlated
-19.02%
BE - CSIQ
50%
Loosely correlated
-9.53%
PLUG - CSIQ
48%
Loosely correlated
-10.69%
SLDP - CSIQ
46%
Loosely correlated
-11.45%
More

FCEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCEL has been closely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCEL jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCEL
1D Price
Change %
FCEL100%
-19.02%
RUN - FCEL
66%
Closely correlated
-9.89%
PLUG - FCEL
63%
Loosely correlated
-10.69%
ENPH - FCEL
57%
Loosely correlated
-18.01%
CSIQ - FCEL
54%
Loosely correlated
-11.86%
BLDP - FCEL
54%
Loosely correlated
-18.95%
More