Advertisement
CIB or PNFP or UBCP
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and UBCP’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- CIB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CIB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PNFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.61% , and UBCP (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +4.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CIB is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.
UBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.00% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| CIB | PNFP | UBCP | |
| Capitalization | 8.27B | 6.62B | 82.5M |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 52.273 | -9.056 | 12.323 |
| P/E Ratio | 5.22 | 11.70 | 9.46 |
| Revenue | 28.51T | 1.38B | 29.9M |
| Total Cash | N/A | 229M | 7.95M |
| Total Debt | 32.09T | 2.56B | 102M |
CIB | PNFP | UBCP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 67 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 37 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 10 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 56 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 15 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIB's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (74) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (81). This means that CIB's stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s and somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.
CIB's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (37) and is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (51). This means that CIB's stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s and somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.
CIB's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (10) and is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (53). This means that CIB's stock grew similarly to PNFP’s and somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.
CIB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBCP (45) and is in the same range as PNFP (56). This means that CIB's stock grew similarly to UBCP’s and similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.
UBCP's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (15) and is in the same range as CIB (23). This means that UBCP's stock grew similarly to PNFP’s and similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.
| CIB | PNFP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 71% | 18 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
CIB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIB has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIB jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIB | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| BSAC - CIB | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| AVAL - CIB | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BSBR - CIB | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DB - CIB | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| LYG - CIB | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||
PNFP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNFP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNFP | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| SNV - PNFP | 94% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| FNB - PNFP | 91% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| ONB - PNFP | 91% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| WTFC - PNFP | 91% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| HWC - PNFP | 91% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||
UBCP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UBCP and BSBK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBCP and BSBK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBCP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBCP | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| BSBK - UBCP | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| TFC - UBCP | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| NSTS - UBCP | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BKSC - UBCP | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CMA - UBCP | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||