COPX
Price
$86.98
Change
-$0.30 (-0.34%)
Updated
Sep 21, 11:30 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTWO
Price
$45.90
Change
-$0.16 (-0.35%)
Updated
Sep 21, 11:24 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
77.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GNR
Price
$76.78
Change
-$0.44 (-0.57%)
Updated
Sep 21, 11:33 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX or FTWO or GNR

COPX vs FTWO vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) vs. SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) offers concentrated exposure to copper mining companies through a passive index-tracking approach with 40 holdings and a 0.65% expense ratio.
  • Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) targets national security and natural resource themes across fuel, aerospace and defense, agriculture, nuclear, and precious metals with approximately 51 holdings and a 0.49% expense ratio.
  • SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) provides broad diversification across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining sub-sectors via an equally weighted index with around 92 holdings and the lowest expense ratio at 0.40%.
  • Structural differences center on thematic focus versus breadth, with COPX emphasizing copper, FTWO incorporating security-related industries, and GNR balancing multiple natural resources categories.
  • Cost efficiency favors GNR, while diversification depth is strongest in GNR and FTWO compared to the more concentrated COPX portfolio.
  • Risk profiles vary by concentration: COPX carries higher sector-specific volatility tied to copper prices, whereas GNR and FTWO spread exposure across broader resource and security themes.

Introduction

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX), Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO), and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) represent distinct approaches to natural resources investing. COPX focuses narrowly on copper miners, FTWO blends natural resources with national security themes, and GNR delivers balanced exposure across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) compete within the broader natural resources and commodities equity space, offering investors tiered options based on thematic tilt, diversification, and cost. In the current environment of energy transition, infrastructure demand, and geopolitical considerations, comparing their structures helps clarify relative positioning for portfolio allocation decisions.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The fund is passively managed with a physical replication strategy and holds approximately 40 securities. Top holdings typically include BHP Group Ltd, Teck Resources Ltd, Hudbay Minerals Inc, Southern Copper Corp, and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. Sector allocation centers almost exclusively on materials, with a heavy emphasis on copper mining operations. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. Distinguishing features include its pure-play focus on copper producers and semi-annual distributions. The index is market-capitalization weighted and rebalanced periodically to maintain exposure to global copper mining companies.

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) Overview

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) tracks an index of companies engaged in national security and natural resource security, including fuel, aerospace and defense, agriculture, nuclear, and gold and precious metals. The passively managed fund holds about 51 securities and maintains a 0.49% expense ratio. Representative top holdings often feature Deere & Co, Constellation Energy Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corp, GE Aerospace, and Newmont Corp. Sector exposure spans energy, industrials, materials, and consumer staples. The strategy incorporates corporate governance engagement by the issuer. Distributions occur quarterly, and the index applies market-capitalization weighting with annual or periodic rebalancing.

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) Overview

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) tracks the S&P Global Natural Resources Index, which equally weights three sub-indices covering agriculture, energy, and metals and mining. The passive ETF holds approximately 92 securities with a 0.40% expense ratio. Top holdings commonly include BHP Group Ltd, Nutrien Ltd, Exxon Mobil Corp, Shell Plc, and Newmont Corp. Sector allocation balances energy, materials, and agriculture-related industries on a global basis. The fund employs a sampling strategy for index replication and caps individual security weights at 5%. Distributions are paid semi-annually, and the index rebalances annually to maintain equal sub-sector weights.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The natural resources sector encompasses energy production, metals and mining, agriculture, and related supply chains that support global infrastructure, electrification, and food security. Macroeconomic drivers include demand from renewable energy projects, electric vehicle manufacturing, and data center expansion, alongside supply constraints from geopolitical tensions and regulatory changes. Capital flows have favored producers with strong balance sheets and exposure to critical minerals. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect commodity price volatility and operational efficiency improvements. Geopolitical influences, such as trade policies and resource nationalism, add complexity to supply chains. Sector risks encompass commodity price fluctuations, environmental regulations, and shifts in global trade dynamics that affect all three ETFs through their underlying holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, performance differences among Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX), Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO), and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) have stemmed from varying exposure concentrations and sensitivity to commodity prices. COPX has shown higher volatility due to its narrow copper focus, experiencing sharper drawdowns during periods of metal price weakness and stronger rebounds on demand surges. FTWO and GNR have demonstrated more stable trend consistency through broader diversification across energy, agriculture, and defense-related holdings. Relative positioning highlights COPX’s greater sensitivity to copper-specific macro factors, while GNR’s equal sub-sector weighting and FTWO’s security tilt have contributed to moderated volatility and different responses to inflation or growth environments in recent months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on ETFs like COPX, FTWO, or GNR may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) due to its lowest expense ratio, broadest diversification across natural resources sub-sectors, and balanced risk-adjusted profile. Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) offers targeted thematic exposure but at higher cost and concentration, while Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) provides unique security-related diversification at a moderate expense level. The assessment remains probabilistic and depends on evolving market conditions and investor objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 7.38B vs. GNR (5.27B) and FTWO (77.5M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than COPX and FTWO: GNR (25.740) vs COPX (21.990) and FTWO (13.704). COPX was incepted earlier than FTWO and GNR: COPX (16 years) vs FTWO (3 years) and GNR (16 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FTWO (0.49) and COPX (0.65). FTWO has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) and GNR (15.00) vs COPX (21.67) and GNR (15.00).
COPXFTWOGNR
Gain YTD21.99013.70425.740
Net Assets7.38B77.5M5.27B
Total Expense Ratio0.650.490.40
Turnover21.6723.0015.00
Yield2.070.862.34
Fund Existence16 years3 years16 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXFTWOGNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GNR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MARPS4.540.09
+2.02%
Marine Petroleum Trust
GRO2.430.03
+1.25%
Brazil Potash Corp
PGC45.28-0.13
-0.29%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp
NMR10.07-0.16
-1.56%
Nomura Holdings
STEP46.31-0.79
-1.68%
StepStone Group

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
+0.77%
BHP - COPX
84%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
TKO - COPX
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
MTAL - COPX
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

FTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been closely correlated with NEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then NEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTWO
1D Price
Change %
FTWO100%
-0.88%
NEM - FTWO
75%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
WPM - FTWO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
AEM - FTWO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
RGLD - FTWO
73%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
FNV - FTWO
72%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More

GNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNR
1D Price
Change %
GNR100%
-1.37%
RIO - GNR
75%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
BHP - GNR
72%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WPM - GNR
71%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
NEM - GNR
71%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
AA - GNR
70%
Closely correlated
-5.41%
More