Advertisement
CSIQ or ENPH or JKS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Canadian Solar (CSIQ) vs. Enphase Energy (ENPH) vs. JinkoSolar (JKS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CSIQ exhibits volatility with recent sharp declines but strong 1-year gains of over 100%, trading at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 21.51 amid manufacturing expansions.
- ENPH leads YTD performance at 47.55% with positive EPS (earnings per share) of $1.01, boosted by new microinverter demand and a market cap of $6.23B.
- JKS shows relative stability with lower beta (0.49) but negative EPS of -$10.09, modest YTD return of 7.98%, and focus on high-capacity module production.
- All three operate in the solar sector, facing policy and supply chain pressures, yet ENPH demonstrates superior recent momentum from product innovations.
- Valuations vary: ENPH at trailing P/E 46.82 contrasts with unprofitable peers, highlighting growth trade-offs in relative performance.
- Analyst targets suggest upside for JKS (30.90) over current levels, while ENPH faces some caution.
Introduction
Canadian Solar (CSIQ), Enphase Energy (ENPH), and JinkoSolar (JKS) are key players in the solar energy sector, specializing in modules, microinverters, and photovoltaic products. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, performance, and sector dynamics amid fluctuating demand, policy shifts, and technological advancements. Traders seeking momentum opportunities and investors focused on renewable energy growth will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and valuation sensitivities in the current environment.
CSIQ Overview and Recent Performance
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) manufactures solar modules, battery storage solutions, and provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services through its Manufacturing and Recurrent Energy segments. Headquartered in Kitchener, Canada, the company operates globally, serving distributors and utilities under brands like CSI Solar and e-STORAGE.
In recent market activity, CSIQ has shown heightened volatility, with a beta of 1.44 and a 52-week range of $9.41 to $34.59. The stock experienced sharp declines in recent sessions, down 15.46% intraday, amid broader solar sector pressures including weak shipments and profitability challenges. YTD return stands at 28.69%, supported by prior surges over 100% in the past year, influenced by U.S. manufacturing expansions and storage backlog growth. Sentiment reflects caution due to negative EPS of -$2.50, though analyst targets average $17.74.
ENPH Overview and Recent Performance
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) designs and sells microinverters, batteries, and energy management systems for residential and commercial solar applications. Based in Fremont, California, it emphasizes semiconductor-based solutions with cloud monitoring and EV charging integration, targeting distributors, installers, and homeowners.
Recent weeks have favored ENPH, with shares up 12.60% in a session following U.S. pre-orders for the IQ9S-3P commercial microinverter, outperforming the sector. YTD performance leads peers at 47.55%, within a 52-week range of $25.78 to $52.93 and beta of 1.25. Positive EPS of $1.01 and trailing P/E of 46.82 underscore profitability, though revenue dipped amid U.S. installation slowdowns. A $52M safe-harbor deal boosted backlog to $873.7M, enhancing sentiment despite analyst average target of $40.38.
JKS Overview and Recent Performance
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) produces solar modules, wafers, cells, and ingots, with integrated capacity exceeding 120GW for wafers, 95GW for cells, and 130GW for modules as of late 2025. Headquartered in China, it offers system integration and EPC services across multiple regions including the U.S., Europe, and Asia.
JKS displayed stability in recent trading, down 7.06% intraday but with a low beta of 0.49 signaling lower volatility. YTD return of 7.98% trails peers, within a 52-week range of $17.53 to $31.88, impacted by sector headwinds like oversupply. Negative EPS of -$10.09 reflects profitability strains, yet analyst consensus targets $30.90, implying potential upside. Sentiment ties to global shipment volumes and energy storage expansions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's suite of over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using technical, fundamental, and volatility-based strategies. Only the top 25 most promising bots, selected by AI for current market conditions, earn a spot in this curated section—highlighting those with strong momentum, sector rotation, and risk-adjusted performance like annualized returns up to 227%, win rates of 70-80%, and profit factors exceeding 2.5 in areas such as semiconductors, energy, and tech. These bots vary in styles from swing trading to pattern recognition, offering diversified approaches. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify tools suited to today’s solar and broader market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CSIQ, ENPH, and JKS share solar exposure but diverge in models: module manufacturing for CSIQ and JKS versus ENPH’s inverter tech. Growth drivers include ENPH’s product innovation and backlog versus peers’ capacity builds amid supply gluts.
Recent momentum favors ENPH (YTD 47.55%) over CSIQ (28.69%) and JKS (7.98%), with higher betas (1.44 and 1.25) indicating volatility trade-offs against JKS’s 0.49. Risk factors encompass policy changes, U.S. tariffs, and installation slowdowns, amplified for China-exposed JKS and CSIQ.
Valuation sensitivity shows ENPH’s premium trailing P/E (46.82) on profits, while unprofitable peers trade at forward multiples (21.51 for CSIQ, 53.19 for JKS). Market sentiment leans toward ENPH’s catalysts, balanced by analyst upside for JKS.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors ENPH due to consistent recent momentum, positive EPS, and product-driven catalysts like microinverter demand, positioning it strongly relative to peers amid solar recovery signals. While CSIQ and JKS offer manufacturing scale, their profitability lags and higher volatility suggest probabilistic edges for ENPH in trend stability.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSIQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileENPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and JKS’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CSIQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ENPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JKS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSIQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and JKS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSIQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ENPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- JKS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSIQ (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -5.65% price change this week, while ENPH (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -8.99% , and JKS (@Alternative Power Generation) price fluctuated -9.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSIQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
ENPH is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
JKS is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-10.72% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
| CSIQ | ENPH | JKS | |
| Capitalization | 1.04B | 6.27B | 853M |
| EBITDA | 154M | 229M | -6.28B |
| Gain YTD | -35.423 | 47.301 | -28.621 |
| P/E Ratio | 20.09 | 51.89 | 27.18 |
| Revenue | 5.48B | 1.4B | 63.9B |
| Total Cash | 1.44B | 931M | N/A |
| Total Debt | 7.81B | 581M | N/A |
CSIQ | ENPH | JKS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 58 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 61 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 50 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 15 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JKS's Valuation (3) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (35) in the Electrical Products industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ENPH (93) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that JKS's stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s and significantly faster than ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
JKS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (100) in the Electrical Products industry, and is in the same range as ENPH (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that JKS's stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s and similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's SMR Rating (61) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSIQ (94) in the Electrical Products industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for JKS (97) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ENPH's stock grew somewhat faster than CSIQ’s and somewhat faster than JKS’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as CSIQ (59) in the Electrical Products industry, and is in the same range as JKS (80) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ENPH's stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s and similarly to JKS’s over the last 12 months.
JKS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (4) in the Electrical Products industry, and is in the same range as ENPH (15) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that JKS's stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s and similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
| CSIQ | ENPH | JKS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
CSIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIQ | 100% | -2.97% | ||
| JKS - CSIQ | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.24% | ||
| FCEL - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +22.14% | ||
| BE - CSIQ | 50% Loosely correlated | -18.49% | ||
| PLUG - CSIQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| SLDP - CSIQ | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
JKS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JKS has been loosely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JKS jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JKS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JKS | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| CSIQ - JKS | 59% Loosely correlated | +5.67% | ||
| BE - JKS | 49% Loosely correlated | -5.21% | ||
| FCEL - JKS | 48% Loosely correlated | -8.91% | ||
| SEDG - JKS | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.36% | ||
| NXT - JKS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
More | ||||