Advertisement
FC vs IP
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FC is a StrongBuy and IP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- IP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -3.33% price change this week, while IP (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -14.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
IP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.80% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
@Containers/Packaging (-3.25% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| FC | IP | FC / IP | |
| Capitalization | 521M | 13.5B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 35.9M | 2.24B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -47.552 | -11.585 | 410% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.38 | 45.38 | 65% |
| Revenue | 280M | 18.9B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 34M | 1.11B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 13.2M | 5.91B | 0% |
IP | FC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IP's Valuation (39) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (80) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that IP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
IP's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that IP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
FC's SMR Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as IP (86) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that FC’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.
IP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that IP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
IP's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FC (77) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that IP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FC’s over the last 12 months.
| FC | IP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
FC and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.
IP and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IP has been closely correlated with SW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IP jumps, then SW could also see price increases.