DWAS
Price
$118.79
Change
+$0.76 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:30 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
421.27M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IWO
Price
$379.95
Change
-$1.46 (-0.38%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBW
Price
$39.91
Change
-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
550.37M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DWAS or IWO or PBW

Header iconDWAS vs IWO vs PBW Comparison
Open Charts DWAS vs IWO vs PBWBanner chart's image
DWAS vs IWO vs PBW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) vs. iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) vs. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW)

Key Takeaways

  • DWAS employs a momentum-driven smart beta strategy targeting small-cap stocks with strong price trends, resulting in higher expense ratio of 0.60% and concentrated sector exposure.
  • IWO offers broad passive exposure to U.S. small-cap growth stocks via the Russell 2000 Growth Index at a low 0.24% expense ratio with extensive diversification across approximately 1,000 holdings.
  • PBW provides thematic exposure to clean energy companies through a modified equal-weighted index, featuring the highest expense ratio at 0.64% and fewer holdings around 69.
  • Structural differences include DWAS’s quarterly rebalancing for momentum signals, IWO’s market-cap weighting for growth characteristics, and PBW’s focus on renewable energy innovation.
  • Investors seeking cost efficiency and broad small-cap growth may prefer IWO, while those targeting momentum or clean energy themes face distinct risk profiles tied to sector concentration.
  • All three ETFs emphasize small-cap or thematic equities, making them suitable for portfolios seeking growth beyond large-cap benchmarks but with varying levels of volatility and thematic sensitivity.

Introduction

These three ETFs provide distinct approaches to U.S. equity exposure with a small-cap or thematic orientation. DWAS focuses on momentum within small caps, IWO delivers broad small-cap growth tracking, and PBW targets clean energy innovation. They do not track identical indexes but represent tiered strategies—momentum smart beta, passive growth indexing, and thematic clean energy—allowing investors to compare cost, diversification, and sector tilts in the current environment of evolving growth themes and macroeconomic influences.

Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) Overview

DWAS tracks the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, selecting small-cap stocks based on relative strength and momentum signals. The fund typically holds around 200 securities with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution. Sector allocations often emphasize healthcare, technology, and industrials. Its expense ratio stands at 0.60%. As a smart beta ETF, it uses technical indicators rather than traditional market-cap weighting, distinguishing it through dynamic security selection aimed at capturing trending small-cap performers.

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) Overview

IWO seeks to track the Russell 2000 Growth Index, comprising U.S. small-cap stocks selected for growth characteristics such as higher forecasted earnings and sales growth. The ETF holds a large number of securities, typically over 1,000, using market-capitalization weighting. Key sectors include industrials, information technology, and healthcare. Its expense ratio is 0.24%. This passive index-tracking structure provides broad diversification within the small-cap growth segment without active or thematic overlays.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

PBW tracks the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, focusing on companies involved in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and related technologies. The fund holds approximately 69 securities on a modified equal-weighted basis with quarterly rebalancing. Sector exposure centers on industrials, materials, and information technology. Its expense ratio is 0.64%. As a thematic ETF, it emphasizes clean energy innovation rather than broad market or momentum factors.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The ETFs operate within small-cap equities and growth-oriented themes amid ongoing shifts in technology adoption, energy transition policies, and economic cycles. Capital flows into clean energy reflect regulatory support for renewables and corporate sustainability goals, while small-cap growth segments respond to interest rate environments and earnings expansion in innovative sectors. Geopolitical factors and supply chain developments influence energy and technology holdings across these funds. Broader market cycles affect volatility in small caps, with thematic areas like clean energy facing additional policy and technological disruption risks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months and market cycles, structural differences have driven relative behaviors. IWO’s broad diversification tends to deliver more consistent exposure to small-cap growth trends with lower concentration risk. DWAS momentum approach may amplify gains during strong trending periods but introduce higher turnover-related costs and volatility. PBW thematic focus often exhibits greater sensitivity to clean energy policy shifts and commodity prices, leading to distinct drawdown patterns compared to the more diversified small-cap peers. Expense differences further influence long-term net positioning, with lower-cost options preserving more returns over extended horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, IWO currently presents the most favorable profile for Tickeron’s AI due to its low expense ratio, extensive diversification across the Russell 2000 Growth Index, and balanced sector exposure that supports risk-adjusted positioning in small-cap growth segments. This combination offers cost efficiency and reduced concentration risk relative to the higher-cost thematic or momentum-focused alternatives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWO has more net assets: 14.7B vs. PBW (550M) and DWAS (421M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than DWAS and IWO: PBW (31.042) vs DWAS (22.613) and IWO (17.825). DWAS was incepted earlier than IWO and PBW: DWAS (14 years) vs IWO (26 years) and PBW (21 years). IWO (0.24) has a lower expense ratio than DWAS (0.60) and PBW (0.64). DWAS has a higher turnover PBW (62.00) and IWO (30.00) vs PBW (62.00) and IWO (30.00).
DWASIWOPBW
Gain YTD22.61317.82531.042
Net Assets421M14.7B550M
Total Expense Ratio0.600.240.64
Turnover186.0030.0062.00
Yield0.010.400.60
Fund Existence14 years26 years21 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DWASIWOPBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DWAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIGEX50.43N/A
N/A
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R4
ECIFX12.89N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Balanced C
LSVAX19.69N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Admin
APHMX43.89-0.25
-0.57%
Artisan Mid Cap Institutional
PFGEX28.77-0.30
-1.03%
Parnassus Growth Equity Investor

DWAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DWAS has been closely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DWAS jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DWAS
1D Price
Change %
DWAS100%
+0.53%
CSW - DWAS
71%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
WTS - DWAS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
TMHC - DWAS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
AIN - DWAS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
NPO - DWAS
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
More

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
-0.10%
ENVX - PBW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
BLDP - PBW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
QS - PBW
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
ACHR - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
SLDP - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
More