Advertisement
ET or FANG or SM
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SM’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and SM’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FANG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- SM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -5.07% , and SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated -5.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
ET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
SM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.09% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
@Oil & Gas Production (-1.39% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| ET | FANG | SM | |
| Capitalization | 53B | 35.6B | 5.77B |
| EBITDA | 12.6B | 6.17B | 1.7B |
| Gain YTD | -6.841 | -12.651 | -31.022 |
| P/E Ratio | 14.39 | 11.50 | 7.37 |
| Revenue | 78.6B | 8.34B | 2.36B |
| Total Cash | 161M | 582M | 616M |
| Total Debt | 53.2B | 6.8B | 1.58B |
ET | FANG | SM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 57 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 45 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 33 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 55 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 57 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 44 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ET's Valuation (27) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as SM (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as FANG (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET's stock grew similarly to SM’s and similarly to FANG’s over the last 12 months.
ET's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SM (52) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and somewhat faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.
SM's SMR Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as FANG (55) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as ET (60) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that SM's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.
ET's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as FANG (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as SM (58) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that ET's stock grew similarly to FANG’s and similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.
FANG's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as ET (61) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SM (90) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that FANG's stock grew similarly to ET’s and somewhat faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.
| ET | FANG | SM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 59% | 10 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 80% |
Advertisement
ET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ET jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
FANG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FANG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANG | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| MTDR - FANG | 90% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| OVV - FANG | 89% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| PR - FANG | 89% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| DVN - FANG | 89% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| CHRD - FANG | 88% Closely correlated | -5.06% | ||
More | ||||