FITB or FVCB or MOFG
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FITB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MOFG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- FITB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FVCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MOFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FITB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MOFG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FITB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FVCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MOFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FITB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.42% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.77% , and MOFG (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated -2.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
FITB is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
FVCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
MOFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.01% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FITB | FVCB | MOFG | |
| Capitalization | 25.4B | 218M | 369M |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -14.177 | -9.149 | -3.974 |
| P/E Ratio | 11.40 | 57.21 | 17.17 |
| Revenue | 8.54B | 42.1M | 163M |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 71M |
| Total Debt | 18.9B | 114M | 418M |
FITB | FVCB | MOFG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 28 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 69 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 19 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 54 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 98 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FVCB's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (79) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (89). This means that FVCB's stock grew similarly to FITB’s and somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.
FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (44) and is somewhat better than the same rating for FVCB (69). This means that FITB's stock grew similarly to MOFG’s and somewhat faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.
FITB's SMR Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (12) and is in the same range as FVCB (19). This means that FITB's stock grew similarly to MOFG’s and similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.
MOFG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (54) and is in the same range as FITB (62). This means that MOFG's stock grew similarly to FVCB’s and similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.
MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FITB (50) and is significantly better than the same rating for FVCB (98). This means that MOFG's stock grew somewhat faster than FITB’s and significantly faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.
| FITB | FVCB | MOFG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 63% | 24 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 58% |
FITB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITB | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| PNC - FITB | 90% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CFG - FITB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| HBAN - FITB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| FNB - FITB | 88% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| TFC - FITB | 88% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
FVCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with VBTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then VBTX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FVCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVCB | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| VBTX - FVCB | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| GSBC - FVCB | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| CCBG - FVCB | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| EQBK - FVCB | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| AROW - FVCB | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
More | ||||
MOFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOFG | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| FMBH - MOFG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| NWBI - MOFG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| HBNC - MOFG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SFNC - MOFG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| TCBK - MOFG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
More | ||||