CFG
Price
$71.46
Change
-$0.04 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 21, 02:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.22B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FITB
Price
$57.27
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jul 21, 03:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.04B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs FITB

CFG vs FITB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Group (CFG) vs. Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CFG has delivered stronger total return over the past year, outpacing FITB by a wide margin, though both banks benefit from improving net interest margins.
  • FITB is executing a transformative acquisition of Comerica, a deal that materially expands its geographic footprint into Texas and California and is expected to close in early 2026.
  • Both regional banks posted solid fourth-quarter 2025 earnings beats, with CFG showing faster year-over-year EPS growth while FITB reported a higher absolute return on assets.
  • FITB carries a larger market capitalization and a higher price-to-book multiple, while CFG trades at a relative discount on a book-value basis.
  • Credit quality trends are improving across both institutions, with declining net charge-off ratios and shrinking non-performing loan balances.
  • The two stocks appeal to different investor profiles: CFG offers a self-improvement and private-bank growth narrative, while FITB presents a post-merger scale and synergy story.

Introduction

When evaluating regional banking stocks, investors often compare institutions of similar size, business mix, and market positioning. CFG (Citizens Financial Group) and FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp) fit squarely into that conversation. Both are large U.S. regional banks with diversified commercial and consumer lending operations, growing wealth management segments, and meaningful exposure to the interest-rate cycle. As the Federal Reserve's rate trajectory continues to shape the banking landscape, understanding how these two institutions compare on growth strategy, credit quality, operational efficiency, and valuation has become essential for portfolio positioning. This stock comparison offers a data-driven, side-by-side look at where CFG and FITB stand in the current market environment.

CFG Overview and Recent Performance

CFG, headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island, operates as one of the nation's oldest financial institutions, with approximately $226 billion in assets and a footprint spanning 14 states and the District of Columbia through roughly 1,000 branches. The bank serves retail, small business, and commercial clients, with an increasingly prominent Private Bank division catering to high-net-worth individuals and families.

In recent quarters, CFG has demonstrated strong operational momentum. The company's fourth-quarter 2025 results showcased net income of $528 million and earnings per share (EPS) of $1.13, which beat consensus estimates. Net interest income (NII) — the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits — rose nearly 9% year over year, driven by a net interest margin (NIM) that expanded to 3.07%. Fee-based revenue streams, particularly from capital markets and wealth management, also posted double-digit gains. The Private Bank segment continued exceeding expectations, reaching $14.5 billion in deposits while delivering a 25% return on equity (ROE). Credit quality has been trending favorably, with the net charge-off ratio declining and non-accrual loans shrinking. Management has also launched a multi-year technology initiative called "Reimagine the Bank," targeting $450 million in annual pre-tax savings by 2028. These factors have contributed to CFG's stock significantly outperforming the broader regional banking peer group over the past twelve months.

FITB Overview and Recent Performance

FITB, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a diversified financial services company operating over 1,000 full-service banking centers across the Midwest and Southeast. The bank has been methodically expanding its presence in high-growth Southeastern markets. In 2025 alone, FITB opened 50 new branches in the region, contributing to a 2.5% increase in consumer households.

FITB's recent financial performance has been solid and broad-based. Fourth-quarter 2025 results included net income available to common shareholders of $699 million and diluted EPS of $1.04 — or $1.08 on an adjusted basis, comfortably ahead of analyst estimates. Full-year 2025 produced record NII of $6 billion, up 6% year over year, while the NIM on a fully taxable-equivalent basis reached 3.13%. The Wealth & Asset Management division generated record quarterly revenue, and assets under management (AUM) climbed 16% year over year to $80 billion. The bank's adjusted efficiency ratio — a measure of how much it costs to generate each dollar of revenue — improved to 54.3%, underscoring disciplined expense management. Perhaps most significantly, FITB received regulatory and shareholder approval for its acquisition of Comerica, a transaction poised to add Texas and California to its branch network and bring meaningful scale to its middle-market lending business. Tangible book value per share grew 21% year over year, reflecting strong capital generation and a robust balance sheet.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page provides traders and investors with a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots, chosen from a much larger universe of hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. These bots are not random picks — only those demonstrating strong alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in the trending section. Each bot operates with its own distinct trading style, strategy, timeframe, and risk profile. Some focus on short-term momentum trades lasting just a few days, while others target multi-week swing opportunities. Performance metrics among the featured bots can vary significantly, with certain bots generating notable annualized returns and maintaining win rates that draw the attention of active traders. Whether a trader is looking to complement existing positions in regional banking stocks like CFG and FITB or diversify across entirely different sectors, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer a data-driven starting point for automated trading strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both CFG and FITB operate as regional banks with comparable commercial and consumer banking divisions, their strategic trajectories diverge in important ways. CFG is pursuing an organic, internally driven transformation centered on private banking growth, technology modernization, and capital return. Its "Reimagine the Bank" initiative and the rapid scaling of its Private Bank — which contributed over 7% of pre-tax income in 2025 — represent self-funded catalysts rather than M&A-driven ones. By contrast, FITB is betting heavily on the Comerica acquisition as its primary growth accelerant. The deal is expected to be approximately 9% accretive to EPS by 2027 and will extend FITB's branch footprint into two of the country's largest economies: Texas and California.

On valuation, differences are notable. FITB trades at a higher price-to-book multiple, reflecting market confidence in the Comerica integration story and the bank's above-peer efficiency ratio of approximately 54%. CFG trades at a lower price-to-book multiple but has demonstrated superior stock price momentum over the trailing twelve-month period. Both banks maintain strong common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratios — a key measure of a bank's financial resilience — with CFG at 10.6% and FITB at 10.77%. Credit quality trends are similarly positive for both, with net charge-off ratios declining and non-performing asset ratios shrinking. Where FITB holds an edge is in its Wealth & Asset Management franchise, with $80 billion in AUM and a commercial payments platform generating over $1 billion in annual revenue. CFG counters with faster-growing capital markets and wealth fee income and a rapidly maturing Private Bank that management believes can sustain a mid-teens ROE over the medium term. For dividend-oriented investors, both stocks offer competitive yields, though payout ratios and buyback programs differ modestly in scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, relative trend strength, and positioning across multiple timeframes, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely lean toward CFG in the current environment — while acknowledging that the verdict is nuanced and probabilistic. CFG's stronger price momentum over the past year, combined with cleaner, internally driven catalysts (private bank expansion, cost-efficiency initiatives, and capital return), provides a more consistent trend signal than FITB's M&A-heavy narrative, which carries integration and execution risk. That said, FITB is not without appeal: its superior efficiency ratio, record NII generation, and the potential for EPS accretion from the Comerica deal make it a compelling story for investors with a longer time horizon and a higher tolerance for merger-related uncertainty. The AI's preference would likely shift toward FITB if Comerica synergy milestones are met ahead of schedule and credit trends in the combined loan book remain benign. For now, the balance of trend consistency, relative performance, and stability tilts narrowly in CFG's favor.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CFG vs. FITB commentary
Jul 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and FITB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $71.50 vs. FITB: $57.40)
Brand notoriety: CFG and FITB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 86% vs. FITB: 80%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $30.22B vs. FITB: $52.04B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.22B. FITB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFITB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FITB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than FITB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FITB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FITB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than FITB.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while FITB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FITB($52B) has a higher market cap than CFG($30.2B). FITB has higher P/E ratio than CFG: FITB (19.33) vs CFG (15.58). FITB (24.609) and CFG (24.157) have similar YTD gains . CFG has less debt than FITB: CFG (12.3B) vs FITB (19.5B). FITB has higher revenues than CFG: FITB (9.48B) vs CFG (8.48B).
CFGFITBCFG / FITB
Capitalization30.2B52B58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.15724.60998%
P/E Ratio15.5819.3381%
Revenue8.48B9.48B89%
Total Cash12.7BN/A-
Total Debt12.3B19.5B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs FITB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
FITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2530
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3741
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1413
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (72). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (41). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (9). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (14). This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (43). This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGFITB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FITB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YAAS0.780.03
+3.57%
Youxin Technology Ltd
NXPI267.180.65
+0.24%
NXP Semiconductors NV
GSHR10.49N/A
N/A
Gesher Acquisition Corporation II
WLDN72.65-0.05
-0.07%
Willdan Group
CLF8.98-0.30
-3.23%
Cleveland-Cliffs

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
-1.23%
KEY - CFG
90%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
ZION - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
FNB - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
RF - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
ASB - CFG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
More