Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKAX or FSPGX or VTSAX
FSKAX vs FSPGX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSKAX vs FSPGX vs VTSAX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$183.50
Change-$0.07 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.49B
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx
Price$45.56
Change-$0.37 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.21B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$159.12
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02T
FSKAX vs FSPGX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.02T vs. FSKAX (120B) and FSPGX (42.2B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than FSKAX and FSPGX: VTSAX (1.13) vs FSKAX (0.96) and FSPGX (0.32). FSKAX was incepted earlier than FSPGX and VTSAX: FSKAX (14 years) vs FSPGX (9 years) and VTSAX (25 years). VTSAX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSPGX (0.04) and FSKAX (0.01). FSPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00) and VTSAX (2.00). FSKAX and FSPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: FSKAX (0) and FSPGX (0) vs VTSAX (3000). FSPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.90 vs. FSKAX (14.96) and VTSAX (13.54). FSPGX return over 5 years is better than : 110.79 vs. FSKAX (97.91) and VTSAX (84.65).
| FSKAX | FSPGX | VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | 25 years |
| Gain YTD | 13.913 | 17.258 | 12.924 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 120B | 42.2B | 2.02T |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.32 | 1.13 |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 22.90 | 13.54 |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.83 | 131.68 | 82.90 |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.91 | 110.79 | 84.65 |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.54 | N/A | 225.30 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement