FSSNX
Price
$37.34
Change
+$0.10 (+0.27%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
34.47B
SCHA
Price
$34.55
Change
+$0.34 (+0.99%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
22.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VB
Price
$300.01
Change
+$0.16 (+0.05%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
185.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSSNX or SCHA or VB

FSSNX vs SCHA vs VB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 31, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) vs. Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) vs. Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FSSNX, SCHA, and VB are all low-cost passive vehicles providing exposure to U.S. small-cap equities, with expense ratios at or below 0.03%.
  • Year-to-date returns through late August 2026 show FSSNX leading slightly at approximately 20-22%, followed by SCHA near 20.7% and VB around 17.4%, reflecting minor differences in index construction.
  • All three funds track broad small-cap benchmarks with high correlation, delivering similar risk profiles characterized by elevated volatility relative to large-cap indices.
  • Asset size varies significantly, with VB holding the largest AUM near $80 billion, followed by FSSNX at roughly $35 billion and SCHA near $23 billion.
  • Recent market activity has featured sector rotations favoring technology and healthcare within small-cap segments, influencing relative performance across the vehicles.
  • Investors seeking mutual-fund structure may prefer FSSNX, while those favoring ETF liquidity and intraday trading typically select SCHA or VB.

Introduction

Small-capitalization equities have attracted renewed attention amid shifting market dynamics, prompting comparisons among leading passive vehicles. FSSNX, SCHA, and VB each deliver broad exposure to U.S. small-cap companies through low-cost indexing strategies. Portfolio managers, individual investors, and traders evaluating small-cap allocations often examine these options for differences in tracking methodology, liquidity, and operational structure. The comparison highlights trade-offs relevant to diversified equity portfolios seeking growth potential alongside higher volatility typical of smaller firms.

FSSNX Overview and Recent Performance

FSSNX is the Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund, a mutual fund designed to replicate the Russell 2000 Index of small-capitalization U.S. companies. The vehicle maintains an expense ratio of 0.025% and manages assets exceeding $34 billion. In recent weeks, FSSNX has recorded year-to-date gains near 20-22%, supported by strength in healthcare and technology holdings within the Russell 2000. Market sentiment has reflected broader small-cap recovery patterns, with performance influenced by economic data releases and sector rotations. The fund's mutual-fund format provides end-of-day pricing and automatic dividend reinvestment features.

SCHA Overview and Recent Performance

SCHA is the Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF, which tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It carries an expense ratio of 0.03% and oversees roughly $23 billion in assets. Recent market activity has produced year-to-date returns of approximately 20.7%, with notable contributions from technology and healthcare positions. The ETF structure enables intraday trading and tight bid-ask spreads. Performance in recent weeks has aligned closely with small-cap benchmarks amid fluctuating investor risk appetite and macroeconomic indicators.

VB Overview and Recent Performance

VB is the Vanguard Small-Cap ETF, benchmarked to the CRSP U.S. Small Cap Index. The fund maintains a 0.03% expense ratio and holds the largest asset base among the three at nearly $80 billion. Year-to-date performance through late August 2026 stands near 17.4%, reflecting diversified exposure across small-cap sectors. Recent weeks have shown steady but slightly more modest gains compared with peers, influenced by the index's specific constituent weighting. The ETF format supports high liquidity and efficient trading for larger positions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated section called Trending AI Robots that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots trading thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, including varying win rates and drawdown profiles. Users can explore detailed metrics for each bot to identify approaches suited to specific tickers such as small-cap instruments. Visit Trending AI Robots to review current selections.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The three vehicles differ primarily in index methodology and vehicle type. FSSNX follows the Russell 2000, while SCHA uses the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index and VB tracks the CRSP U.S. Small Cap Index, resulting in modest variations in sector exposure and constituent selection. All maintain ultra-low costs near 0.03%, minimizing fee drag over long horizons. VB offers superior liquidity due to its larger asset base, whereas FSSNX suits investors preferring mutual-fund convenience. Recent momentum has favored vehicles with heavier technology weighting, creating small performance differentials. Risk factors remain comparable, with elevated sensitivity to interest-rate shifts and economic growth signals common across small-cap strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to SCHA. Its index construction and sector balance have aligned slightly more closely with prevailing small-cap leadership patterns, though all three remain highly correlated. Investors should monitor ongoing economic indicators for continued alignment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHAVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DXD16.600.20
+1.22%
ProShares UltraShort Dow30
TQQY12.250.07
+0.56%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
AGZ108.11-0.09
-0.09%
iShares Agency Bond ETF
IVVM37.87-0.05
-0.13%
iShares Large Cap Moderate Qt Ldrd ETF
DFLV42.05-0.15
-0.36%
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

SCHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHA
1D Price
Change %
SCHA100%
+0.99%
THC - SCHA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
FIX - SCHA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
CNM - SCHA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
NTRA - SCHA
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
TXRH - SCHA
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More

VB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VB has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VB jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VB
1D Price
Change %
VB100%
+0.05%
BLDR - VB
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
RS - VB
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
PTC - VB
53%
Loosely correlated
-6.04%
ENTG - VB
53%
Loosely correlated
+6.15%
TRGP - VB
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More