FXN
Price
$20.36
Change
-$0.06 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OIH
Price
$375.55
Change
-$4.98 (-1.31%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RSPG
Price
$98.55
Change
-$0.44 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
531.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXN or OIH or RSPG

FXN vs OIH vs RSPG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® Fund (FXN) vs. VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) vs. Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Key Takeaways

  • FXN employs a smart beta AlphaDEX strategy selecting ~37 energy stocks from Russell 1000 based on growth/value factors, offering modified equal weighting with quarterly rebalancing and 0.63% expense ratio.
  • OIH provides concentrated exposure to 25-26 oil services firms via market-cap weighting, with top 10 holdings comprising ~71% of assets, lowest expense ratio at 0.35%, and semi-annual reviews/quarterly rebalances.
  • RSPG delivers equal-weighted diversification across ~22 S&P 500 energy stocks at 0.40% expense ratio, quarterly rebalanced, reducing mega-cap dominance for balanced sector exposure.
  • OIH exhibits highest concentration risk but deepest oil services tilt; FXN adds factor-driven alpha potential; RSPG prioritizes diversification within large-cap energy.
  • All three are passive ETFs fully allocated to energy (95%+), differing in sub-sector focus: broad energy (FXN/RSPG) vs. niche oil equipment/services (OIH).
  • Cost efficiency favors OIH, while RSPG offers superior diversification; FXN suits factor-seeking investors amid volatile energy cycles.

Introduction

FXN, OIH, and RSPG offer distinct approaches to energy sector exposure amid heightened geopolitical tensions and fluctuating oil prices in recent months. FXN uses a smart beta methodology to target alpha-generating energy stocks, OIH focuses narrowly on oil services critical to upstream activities, and RSPG applies equal weighting to S&P 500 energy constituents for balanced large-cap coverage. These ETFs compete within the energy theme but vary in strategy—factor-based selection (FXN), concentrated niche (OIH), and equal-weight broad sector (RSPG)—allowing investors to choose based on risk tolerance, sub-sector preference, and cost in a market driven by supply dynamics and macro uncertainty.

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® Fund (FXN) Overview

The First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® Fund (FXN) seeks investment results tracking the StrataQuant® Energy Index, a modified equal-dollar weighted benchmark. This smart beta (factor-based investing using rules to select stocks with potential for outperformance) index selects stocks from the Russell 1000® energy sector using the proprietary AlphaDEX® methodology, which ranks constituents on growth factors (e.g., three-, six-, and 12-month price appreciation) and value factors (e.g., price-to-sales, price-to-book). The fund holds approximately 37 securities, with top 10 comprising ~45% of assets, including OVV (~5%), PR (~5%), DVN (~4.8%), MTDR (~4.7%), and APA (~4.6%). Sector allocation is ~95% energy, with minor technology exposure. Expense ratio: 0.63%. Quarterly rebalanced to refresh factor scores and tiered equal weights, emphasizing mid-cap explorers/producers alongside services.

VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) Overview

The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) tracks the MVIS® US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, a modified market-cap weighted benchmark focusing on the largest, most liquid U.S.-listed companies providing oil equipment, services, and drilling to upstream oil producers. With ~26 holdings, it features high concentration: top 10 account for ~71%, led by SLB (~20%), BKR (~12%), HAL (~7%), FTI (~6.5%), and TS (~5%). Fully allocated to energy (oil services sub-sector). Expense ratio: 0.35%. The index undergoes semi-annual reviews and quarterly rebalances (March, June, September, December) to maintain liquidity and 20% single-stock cap, positioning OIH for leveraged plays on drilling activity.

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) Overview

The Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) follows the S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, equally weighting all energy sector components of the S&P 500 (primarily large-caps in exploration, production, refining, and midstream). Holding ~22-24 stocks, top 10 represent ~48-49%, such as TRGP (~5%), WMB (~5%), KMI (~4.9%), APA (~4.9%), and MPC (~4.9%). 100% energy sector. Expense ratio: 0.40%. Quarterly rebalanced (March, June, September, December) to reset equal weights (~4-5% each), supplemented by S&P MidCap 400 if needed to meet minimum holdings, promoting diversification beyond cap-weighted giants.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The energy sector navigates robust supply growth from non-OPEC+ producers (U.S., Brazil, Guyana) outpacing demand amid geopolitical volatility, including Middle East tensions and potential Strait of Hormuz disruptions elevating risk premiums on oil prices. Recent months saw Brent crude spikes from conflicts, boosting upstream spending but pressuring refiners; capital flows favor services amid sustained drilling. Macro drivers like AI-driven power demand and moderating global inflation support midstream stability, while regulatory scrutiny on emissions and OPEC+ cuts influence earnings. Major holdings report mixed trends: explorers benefit from prices above $70/bbl, services from rig counts, but oversupply risks loom. Geopolitical risks (Ukraine, Venezuela sanctions) amplify volatility, with sector drawdowns tied to transit chokepoints and policy shifts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, energy ETFs rallied amid oil price surges, with OIH leading due to its leveraged oil services exposure amid rising rig activity, followed by FXN's factor tilt toward high-momentum explorers, and RSPG trailing slightly from equal-weight drag by underperforming refiners. OIH shows highest relative volatility and drawdowns from concentration (top holding ~20%), sensitive to capex cycles; FXN balances with ~45% top-10 but factor rotation aids trend consistency; RSPG exhibits lower volatility via diversification, less macro-sensitive. Performance divergences stem from structures: OIH amplifies upstream spending, FXN captures alpha in volatile picks, RSPG smooths large-cap biases. Recent market cycles highlight OIH's upside in rallies, RSPG's resilience in corrections.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to uncover ETF insights like those for FXN, OIH, and RSPG.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors OIH with moderate conviction (~60% probability edge) due to superior cost efficiency (0.35% expense), proven momentum stability in recent energy upcycles, and precise positioning in high-beta oil services amid sustained upstream demand. While RSPG excels in diversification and FXN in factor potential, OIH's structural liquidity and lower fees enhance risk-adjusted positioning without excessive concentration risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OIH has more net assets: 2B vs. FXN (1.13B) and RSPG (531M). OIH has a higher annual dividend yield than RSPG and FXN: OIH (33.627) vs RSPG (25.675) and FXN (24.825). FXN was incepted earlier than OIH and RSPG: FXN (19 years) vs OIH (15 years) and RSPG (20 years). OIH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than RSPG (0.40) and FXN (0.63). FXN has a higher turnover RSPG (22.00) and OIH (21.00) vs RSPG (22.00) and OIH (21.00).
FXNOIHRSPG
Gain YTD24.82533.62725.675
Net Assets1.13B2B531M
Total Expense Ratio0.630.350.40
Turnover50.0021.0022.00
Yield1.831.162.02
Fund Existence19 years15 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FXNOIHRSPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FXN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OIH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCVX23.070.17
+0.74%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Inv
MSGUX47.57N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C
AULRX80.67N/A
N/A
American Century Ultra® R
ICRPX29.43N/A
N/A
VY® Columbia Real Estate A
LGCAX21.30N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Global Equity A

FXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXN has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXN jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FXN
1D Price
Change %
FXN100%
+1.00%
OVV - FXN
90%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
DVN - FXN
88%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
CHRD - FXN
88%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
MUR - FXN
87%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
PR - FXN
87%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
More

OIH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OIH has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OIH jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OIH
1D Price
Change %
OIH100%
+2.49%
SLB - OIH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
NOV - OIH
84%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
HAL - OIH
83%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
BKR - OIH
80%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HP - OIH
79%
Closely correlated
+3.82%
More

RSPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSPG has been closely correlated with COP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSPG jumps, then COP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSPG
1D Price
Change %
RSPG100%
+1.47%
COP - RSPG
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
DVN - RSPG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
EOG - RSPG
85%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
APA - RSPG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
OXY - RSPG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More