FXN, OIH, and RSPG offer distinct approaches to energy sector exposure amid heightened geopolitical tensions and fluctuating oil prices in recent months. FXN uses a smart beta methodology to target alpha-generating energy stocks, OIH focuses narrowly on oil services critical to upstream activities, and RSPG applies equal weighting to S&P 500 energy constituents for balanced large-cap coverage. These ETFs compete within the energy theme but vary in strategy—factor-based selection (FXN), concentrated niche (OIH), and equal-weight broad sector (RSPG)—allowing investors to choose based on risk tolerance, sub-sector preference, and cost in a market driven by supply dynamics and macro uncertainty.
The First Trust Energy AlphaDEX® Fund (FXN) seeks investment results tracking the StrataQuant® Energy Index, a modified equal-dollar weighted benchmark. This smart beta (factor-based investing using rules to select stocks with potential for outperformance) index selects stocks from the Russell 1000® energy sector using the proprietary AlphaDEX® methodology, which ranks constituents on growth factors (e.g., three-, six-, and 12-month price appreciation) and value factors (e.g., price-to-sales, price-to-book). The fund holds approximately 37 securities, with top 10 comprising ~45% of assets, including OVV (~5%), PR (~5%), DVN (~4.8%), MTDR (~4.7%), and APA (~4.6%). Sector allocation is ~95% energy, with minor technology exposure. Expense ratio: 0.63%. Quarterly rebalanced to refresh factor scores and tiered equal weights, emphasizing mid-cap explorers/producers alongside services.
The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) tracks the MVIS® US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, a modified market-cap weighted benchmark focusing on the largest, most liquid U.S.-listed companies providing oil equipment, services, and drilling to upstream oil producers. With ~26 holdings, it features high concentration: top 10 account for ~71%, led by SLB (~20%), BKR (~12%), HAL (~7%), FTI (~6.5%), and TS (~5%). Fully allocated to energy (oil services sub-sector). Expense ratio: 0.35%. The index undergoes semi-annual reviews and quarterly rebalances (March, June, September, December) to maintain liquidity and 20% single-stock cap, positioning OIH for leveraged plays on drilling activity.
The Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) follows the S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, equally weighting all energy sector components of the S&P 500 (primarily large-caps in exploration, production, refining, and midstream). Holding ~22-24 stocks, top 10 represent ~48-49%, such as TRGP (~5%), WMB (~5%), KMI (~4.9%), APA (~4.9%), and MPC (~4.9%). 100% energy sector. Expense ratio: 0.40%. Quarterly rebalanced (March, June, September, December) to reset equal weights (~4-5% each), supplemented by S&P MidCap 400 if needed to meet minimum holdings, promoting diversification beyond cap-weighted giants.
The energy sector navigates robust supply growth from non-OPEC+ producers (U.S., Brazil, Guyana) outpacing demand amid geopolitical volatility, including Middle East tensions and potential Strait of Hormuz disruptions elevating risk premiums on oil prices. Recent months saw Brent crude spikes from conflicts, boosting upstream spending but pressuring refiners; capital flows favor services amid sustained drilling. Macro drivers like AI-driven power demand and moderating global inflation support midstream stability, while regulatory scrutiny on emissions and OPEC+ cuts influence earnings. Major holdings report mixed trends: explorers benefit from prices above $70/bbl, services from rig counts, but oversupply risks loom. Geopolitical risks (Ukraine, Venezuela sanctions) amplify volatility, with sector drawdowns tied to transit chokepoints and policy shifts.
In recent months, energy ETFs rallied amid oil price surges, with OIH leading due to its leveraged oil services exposure amid rising rig activity, followed by FXN's factor tilt toward high-momentum explorers, and RSPG trailing slightly from equal-weight drag by underperforming refiners. OIH shows highest relative volatility and drawdowns from concentration (top holding ~20%), sensitive to capex cycles; FXN balances with ~45% top-10 but factor rotation aids trend consistency; RSPG exhibits lower volatility via diversification, less macro-sensitive. Performance divergences stem from structures: OIH amplifies upstream spending, FXN captures alpha in volatile picks, RSPG smooths large-cap biases. Recent market cycles highlight OIH's upside in rallies, RSPG's resilience in corrections.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to uncover ETF insights like those for FXN, OIH, and RSPG.
Tickeron’s AI favors OIH with moderate conviction (~60% probability edge) due to superior cost efficiency (0.35% expense), proven momentum stability in recent energy upcycles, and precise positioning in high-beta oil services amid sustained upstream demand. While RSPG excels in diversification and FXN in factor potential, OIH's structural liquidity and lower fees enhance risk-adjusted positioning without excessive concentration risks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FXN | OIH | RSPG | |
| Gain YTD | 24.825 | 33.627 | 25.675 |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 2B | 531M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.35 | 0.40 |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 21.00 | 22.00 |
| Yield | 1.83 | 1.16 | 2.02 |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | 20 years |
| FXN | OIH | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXN has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXN jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OIH has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OIH jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSPG has been closely correlated with COP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSPG jumps, then COP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSPG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSPG | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| COP - RSPG | 87% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| DVN - RSPG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| EOG - RSPG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| APA - RSPG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| OXY - RSPG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||