HCM
Price
$16.80
Change
-$0.10 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.88B
48 days until earnings call
HGV
Price
$39.38
Change
+$1.09 (+2.85%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.9B
51 days until earnings call
SCM
Price
$13.54
Change
-$0.13 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
312.91M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCM or HGV or SCM

Header iconHCM vs HGV vs SCM Comparison
Open Charts HCM vs HGV vs SCMBanner chart's image
HUTCHMED (China)
Price$16.80
Change-$0.10 (-0.59%)
Volume$2.38K
Capitalization2.88B
Hilton Grand Vacations
Price$39.38
Change+$1.09 (+2.85%)
Volume$4.29K
Capitalization4.9B
STELLUS CAPITAL INVESTMENT
Price$13.54
Change-$0.13 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.17K
Capitalization312.91M
HCM vs HGV vs SCM Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (HCM: $16.79HGV: $38.29SCM: $13.57)
Brand notoriety: HCM, HGV and SCM are all not notable
HCM represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry, HGV is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry, and SCM is in the Investment Managers industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCM: 61%, HGV: 91%, SCM: 76%
Market capitalization -- HCM: $2.88B, HGV: $4.9B, SCM: $312.91M
HCM [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $2.88B. HGV’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $4.9B. SCM [@Investment Managers] has a market capitalization of $312.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHGV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SCM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HGV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCM is a better buy in the long-term than HGV, which in turn is a better option than HCM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SCM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HGV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCM is a better buy in the short-term than HCM, which in turn is a better option than HGV.

Price Growth

HCM (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +5.20% price change this week, while HGV (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -4.59% , and SCM (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +245.11%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.40%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

HGV is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SCM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+1.39% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.17% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Investment Managers (-0.29% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HGV($4.9B) has a higher market cap than HCM($2.88B) and SCM($313M). HCM has higher P/E ratio than HGV and SCM: HCM (27.95) vs HGV (16.70) and SCM (16.21). HCM YTD gains are higher at: 16.516 vs. SCM (3.378) and HGV (-1.694). HGV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 840M vs. HCM (67.3M) and SCM (). HCM has more cash in the bank: 886M vs. HGV (589M) and SCM (). HCM has less debt than SCM and HGV: HCM (86.1M) vs SCM (576M) and HGV (4.59B). HGV has higher revenues than HCM and SCM: HGV (3.98B) vs HCM (838M) and SCM (21.2M).
HCMHGVSCM
Capitalization2.88B4.9B313M
EBITDA67.3M840MN/A
Gain YTD16.516-1.6943.378
P/E Ratio27.9516.7016.21
Revenue838M3.98B21.2M
Total Cash886M589MN/A
Total Debt86.1M4.59B576M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCM vs HGV vs SCM: Fundamental Ratings
HCM
HGV
SCM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1004810
SMR RATING
1..100
888741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
435951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCM's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGV (84) in the Real Estate Development industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HCM (89) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SCM's stock grew significantly faster than HGV’s and significantly faster than HCM’s over the last 12 months.

SCM's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (48) in the Real Estate Development industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HCM (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SCM's stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s and significantly faster than HCM’s over the last 12 months.

SCM's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (87) in the Real Estate Development industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HCM (88) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SCM's stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s and somewhat faster than HCM’s over the last 12 months.

HCM's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as SCM (51) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HGV (59) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that HCM's stock grew similarly to SCM’s and similarly to HGV’s over the last 12 months.

HGV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as HCM (5) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SCM (79) in the null industry. This means that HGV's stock grew similarly to HCM’s and significantly faster than SCM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMHGVSCM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HGV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TINY42.88N/A
N/A
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
KBA23.79-0.18
-0.75%
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF
EWW61.06-0.51
-0.83%
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
SFY113.25-1.34
-1.17%
SoFi Select 500 ETF
AOTG46.11-0.92
-1.96%
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF

HGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HGV has been closely correlated with VAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HGV jumps, then VAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGV
1D Price
Change %
HGV100%
-2.72%
VAC - HGV
79%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
BYD - HGV
66%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
RRR - HGV
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
GDEN - HGV
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
CZR - HGV
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.41%
More