IVV
Price
$740.91
Change
-$19.92 (-2.62%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
832.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOO
Price
$678.00
Change
-$18.06 (-2.59%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
1.7T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVV vs VOO

Header iconIVV vs VOO Comparison
Open Charts IVV vs VOOBanner chart's image
IVV vs VOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Key Takeaways

  • Both IVV and VOO are passive ETFs tracking the S&P 500 Index, offering nearly identical exposure to approximately 500 large-cap U.S. stocks with market-cap weighting.
  • Expense ratios are identical at 0.03%, making cost structures equivalent for long-term holders.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly, led by NVDA (~7.8%), AAPL (~6.5%), and MSFT (~5.3%), representing over 35% of assets.
  • Sector allocations mirror the S&P 500, with Information Technology at ~33%, Financials ~12-13%, and Communication Services ~10-11%.
  • VOO edges in liquidity with higher average daily volume (~10M shares) and larger AUM (~$1.5T vs. IVV's ~$708B), supporting tighter spreads.
  • Structural differences are minimal; both employ full replication with low turnover (~2-3%), ideal for core equity exposure.

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of large-cap equity ETFs, iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) stand out as premier options for investors seeking broad U.S. market exposure. Both funds track the S&P 500 Index, providing diversified access to the largest 500 U.S. companies by market capitalization. They compete directly as low-cost, passive vehicles targeting similar investor goals: long-term growth through benchmark replication. Amid ongoing sector rotation toward technology and financials, capital flows into these ETFs have surged in recent market cycles, underscoring their role as core portfolio holdings. This comparison highlights subtle structural nuances in liquidity, scale, and efficiency to aid ETF selection.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) Overview

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), managed by BlackRock, seeks to track the S&P 500 Index, a benchmark of large-capitalization U.S. equities. It employs a full-replication strategy, holding all index constituents in market-cap weights. As of recent data, IVV maintains 503 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.03%. Top holdings include NVDA (7.79%), AAPL (6.61%), MSFT (5.23%), AMZN (3.57%), and GOOGL (3.09%). Sector allocations feature Information Technology (33.37%), Financials (12.20%), Communication Services (10.58%), and Consumer Discretionary (9.85%). With AUM exceeding $707 billion and average daily volume around 8 million shares, IVV offers robust liquidity via a median bid-ask spread of 0.00%. The fund rebalances in line with the index's quarterly adjustments, ensuring precise tracking.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) aims to replicate the S&P 500 Index through a passively managed, full-replication approach. It holds 504 stocks with a 0.03% expense ratio. Key positions mirror the benchmark: NVDA (7.84%), AAPL (6.47%), MSFT (5.40%), AMZN (3.93%), and GOOGL (3.32%). Sectors are led by Information Technology (33.40%), Financials (12.90%), Communication Services (11.00%), and Consumer Discretionary (10.40%). VOO boasts AUM of approximately $1.5 trillion (fund total) and higher average daily volume (~10.6 million shares), with a 0.00% median bid-ask spread. Turnover stands at 2.3%, reflecting efficient index alignment and quarterly rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The S&P 500 underpins both ETFs, representing ~80% of U.S. equity market capitalization with heavy emphasis on technology megacaps. Current market dynamics favor Information Technology amid AI advancements and cloud computing growth, while Financials benefit from interest rate stabilization and economic resilience. Communication Services gains from digital advertising and streaming, though Consumer Discretionary faces cyclical pressures from spending patterns. Macro drivers include moderating inflation, potential rate cuts, and geopolitical tensions influencing energy allocations. Capital flows into large-cap passives have accelerated in recent cycles, driven by institutional demand for low-volatility beta exposure. Sector risks encompass valuation stretches in tech and regulatory scrutiny on big tech, balanced by the index's diversification across 11 GICS sectors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

IVV and VOO deliver virtually identical returns over recent weeks and months, closely hugging the S&P 500 amid tech-led rallies and rotations into financials and industrials. Both exhibit low tracking error due to full replication, with volatility profiles matching the benchmark's beta of 1.00. In recent market cycles, performance has been propelled by top holdings like NVDA and AAPL, buoyed by earnings strength in semiconductors and consumer electronics. Relative positioning remains neutral, though VOO's larger scale may confer marginal advantages in execution efficiency during volatility spikes. Divergences, if any, stem from minor liquidity or dividend reinvestment timing, but broader macro shifts like interest rate expectations dominate shared trajectories.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds covering thousands of tickers. Updated in real-time for current market conditions, the section highlights around 25 bots excelling across sectors like energy, semiconductors, aerospace, and ETFs. Each features key metrics including annualized returns ranging from +16% to over +214%, win rates of 53% to 95%, profit factors up to 8.99, and varying timeframes from 1 day to 62 days. Bots trade diverse symbols with equity charts and drawdown details for transparency. Explore these strongest performers to potentially enhance your strategy—visit the page for live insights and copy trading options.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI slightly favors VOO due to its superior liquidity profile, larger AUM enabling tighter spreads, and equivalent diversification and cost efficiency. While structural attributes are nearly indistinguishable, VOO's scale supports marginally better execution in varying volume environments, aligning with trend consistency in large-cap momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 1.28T. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 855B to 1.7T. VOO holds the highest valuation in this group at 1.7T. The lowest valued company is IVV at 855B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -3%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 8%. VOO experienced the highest price growth at -3%, while IVV experienced the biggest fall at -3%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 31%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 9% and the average quarterly volume growth was 21%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
IVV vs. VOO commentary
Jun 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVV is a Hold and VOO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOO has more net assets: 1.7T vs. IVV (833B). IVV (8.459) and VOO (8.121) have matching annual dividend yield . IVV was incepted earlier than VOO: IVV (26 years) vs VOO (16 years). IVV (0.03) and VOO (0.03) have comparable expense ratios . IVV has a higher turnover VOO (2.00) vs VOO (2.00).
IVVVOOIVV / VOO
Gain YTD8.4598.121104%
Net Assets833B1.7T49%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.03100%
Turnover3.002.00150%
Yield1.061.03103%
Fund Existence26 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVVVOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIXH41.990.06
+0.13%
ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF
XHYC36.80N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr Cyclcls Sctr ETF
FFOX27.92-0.60
-2.11%
Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF
AMID35.08-0.94
-2.60%
Argent Mid Cap ETF
URA45.31-4.97
-9.88%
Global X Uranium ETF