IVV
Price
$730.17
Change
-$6.33 (-0.86%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
858.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMO
Price
$154.20
Change
-$5.44 (-3.41%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
22.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPY
Price
$728.99
Change
-$5.31 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
772.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVV or SPMO or SPY

IVV vs SPMO vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) vs. Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)

Key Takeaways

  • IVV and SPY both provide broad, market-cap-weighted exposure to the S&P 500 Index, offering high diversification across approximately 500 large-cap U.S. stocks with minimal structural differences.
  • SPMO applies a momentum-based smart-beta strategy, selecting S&P 500 constituents with the strongest recent price momentum, resulting in a more concentrated and higher-turnover portfolio.
  • Expense ratios differ notably: IVV at 0.03% is the lowest-cost option, followed by SPY at 0.09%, while SPMO charges 0.13% due to its active index methodology.
  • IVV and SPY deliver nearly identical risk-adjusted returns over market cycles given their identical underlying index, whereas SPMO exhibits higher volatility and potential outperformance in trending markets.
  • All three ETFs maintain strong liquidity profiles as large, established products listed on major U.S. exchanges, suitable for both institutional and retail investors.
  • Structural distinctions—passive replication versus momentum tilt—drive differences in sector exposure, concentration risk, and sensitivity to market regimes.

Introduction

IVV, SPMO, and SPY represent three distinct approaches to large-cap U.S. equity exposure within the S&P 500 universe. IVV and SPY track the same broad market-cap-weighted benchmark, providing comprehensive diversification across sectors and companies. SPMO, by contrast, implements a rules-based momentum strategy that tilts toward stocks exhibiting the strongest recent performance. These ETFs compete in the core large-cap segment yet differ in construction methodology, cost structure, and risk-return characteristics, making them relevant for investors evaluating passive versus factor-enhanced strategies in the current market environment.

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) Overview

IVV seeks to track the performance of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 500 large-cap U.S. stocks weighted by market capitalization. Top holdings typically include leading technology and consumer names such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations reflect the S&P 500 composition, with significant weights in information technology, financials, and health care. The expense ratio stands at 0.03%. As a passively managed ETF from iShares, IVV employs full replication and rebalances quarterly in line with index changes, emphasizing low-cost, broad-market exposure.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index, selecting and weighting constituents based on 12-month price momentum scores with quarterly rebalancing. The strategy results in a concentrated portfolio of roughly 100 holdings, emphasizing stocks with the strongest recent price trends. Top positions often rotate among high-momentum names in technology and other growth-oriented sectors. The expense ratio is 0.13%. As a smart-beta ETF from Invesco, SPMO introduces a systematic factor tilt while remaining rules-based and transparent, distinguishing it from pure market-cap indexing.

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Overview

SPY aims to replicate the S&P 500 Index before expenses. It holds all 500 constituent stocks in market-capitalization weights. Top holdings mirror those of other S&P 500 trackers, led by major technology firms. Sector exposure aligns closely with the index benchmark. The expense ratio is 0.09%. Structured as a unit investment trust managed by State Street Global Advisors, SPY uses full replication and adjusts holdings to match index reconstitutions, serving as a foundational large-cap vehicle with exceptional liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The large-cap U.S. equity market continues to be influenced by macroeconomic factors including interest-rate policy, corporate earnings growth in technology, and capital flows into passive strategies. Regulatory developments around index methodology and factor-based products affect product innovation. Geopolitical tensions and supply-chain dynamics impact sector performance, particularly in technology and industrials. Earnings trends among mega-cap companies remain a primary driver of index returns, while investor preference for low-cost core holdings supports sustained demand for S&P 500-linked products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, IVV and SPY have delivered nearly identical returns given their shared benchmark, with differences limited to minor tracking error and expense variations. SPMO has shown greater sensitivity to momentum regimes, delivering stronger relative performance during sustained uptrends but experiencing larger drawdowns when momentum reverses. The momentum tilt introduces higher concentration risk and elevated volatility compared with the diversified market-cap approach of IVV and SPY. Positioning favors IVV for cost-conscious investors seeking broad exposure, while SPMO appeals to those targeting factor-driven outperformance.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, diversification profile, and cost efficiency, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favorable risk-adjusted positioning to IVV. Its lowest expense ratio and full S&P 500 replication provide broad, stable exposure with minimal drag, while SPMO’s momentum overlay offers potential upside in favorable regimes at the cost of added volatility and concentration.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVV has more net assets: 858B vs. SPY (772B) and SPMO (22.2B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than SPY and IVV: SPMO (29.797) vs SPY (7.471) and IVV (7.174). IVV was incepted earlier than SPMO and SPY: IVV (26 years) vs SPMO (11 years) and SPY (33 years). IVV (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than SPY (0.09) and SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover IVV (3.00) and SPY (3.00) vs IVV (3.00) and SPY (3.00).
IVVSPMOSPY
Gain YTD7.17429.7977.471
Net Assets858B22.2B772B
Total Expense Ratio0.030.130.09
Turnover3.0044.003.00
Yield1.060.670.98
Fund Existence26 years11 years33 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVVSPMOSPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBXJ19.870.01
+0.03%
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan
DMAR44.46-0.06
-0.12%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Mar
GSJY51.98-0.15
-0.29%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF
IDMO59.60-0.55
-0.91%
Invesco S&P International Dev Momt ETF
MEMY20.31-1.28
-5.91%
Tuttle Capital Meme Stock Inc Blst ETF

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
-3.41%
LRCX - SPMO
73%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
AMAT - SPMO
70%
Closely correlated
-6.16%
KLAC - SPMO
69%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
ETN - SPMO
69%
Closely correlated
-4.09%
AVGO - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
-3.67%
More