MAGX
Price
$63.74
Change
+$4.17 (+7.00%)
Updated
Sep 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
64.34M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QQQU
Price
$64.30
Change
+$4.05 (+6.72%)
Updated
Sep 21, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
75.37M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSLL
Price
$10.18
Change
+$0.55 (+5.71%)
Updated
Sep 21 closing price
Net Assets
3.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MAGX or QQQU or TSLL

MAGX vs QQQU vs TSLL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 02, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) vs. Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF (QQQU) vs. Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL)

Key Takeaways

  • MAGX and QQQU both target 2X daily exposure to the Magnificent Seven stocks, while TSLL focuses exclusively on 2X daily exposure to Tesla (TSLA), resulting in significantly higher concentration risk.
  • All three ETFs employ daily rebalancing and leverage through swaps or derivatives, making them tactical tools suited for short-term trading rather than long-term holding.
  • Expense ratios are comparable, with TSLL at 0.83%, MAGX at 0.95%, and QQQU at approximately 0.98%, reflecting the higher costs associated with leveraged structures.
  • MAGX and QQQU offer broader diversification within the Magnificent Seven theme compared to TSLL’s single-stock focus, reducing idiosyncratic risk but maintaining high sensitivity to technology sector movements.
  • Structural differences in underlying indices and rebalancing methodologies contribute to varying volatility profiles, with TSLL exhibiting the highest potential for amplified drawdowns during adverse Tesla-specific events.
  • These ETFs compete in the leveraged thematic space, providing tiered risk exposures to the same core technology mega-cap theme but with distinct concentration levels.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to leading technology names often compare leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that target the Magnificent Seven stocks or subsets thereof. MAGX, QQQU, and TSLL represent distinct approaches within this leveraged thematic category: MAGX and QQQU deliver 2X daily results tied to the broader Magnificent Seven basket, whereas TSLL provides 2X daily results on Tesla alone. These products do not track similar indexes but instead offer tiered risk exposures to the same high-growth technology theme, appealing to traders navigating recent market cycles characterized by artificial intelligence (AI) momentum and sector volatility.

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) Overview

MAGX seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2X) the performance of the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF. The fund employs synthetic exposure primarily through swap agreements and maintains a small number of holdings focused on these derivatives and cash equivalents. It targets equal-weighted exposure to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a leveraged product, MAGX resets exposure daily and is designed for short-term tactical use rather than multi-day holding periods.

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF (QQQU) Overview

QQQU aims to deliver 2X daily performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, which tracks the seven largest NASDAQ-listed companies meeting specific liquidity and price criteria. The ETF utilizes a combination of securities, swaps, and other financial instruments to achieve leveraged exposure. Holdings center on the same Magnificent Seven names with periodic rebalancing. The expense ratio is approximately 0.98%. Like other daily-reset leveraged products, QQQU requires active monitoring and is not intended for long-term buy-and-hold strategies.

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) Overview

TSLL seeks 2X daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of the common shares of Tesla (TSLA). The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in TSLA securities and derivatives such as swaps to generate the targeted leverage. It is non-diversified with a primary focus on a single holding. The net expense ratio is 0.83%. Daily rebalancing ensures the 2X exposure resets each trading day, amplifying both gains and losses relative to Tesla’s price movements.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The Magnificent Seven theme continues to dominate capital flows in the technology sector, driven by AI infrastructure spending, semiconductor demand, and cloud computing growth. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, regulatory scrutiny on large-cap technology firms, and earnings trends among key holdings influence sector sentiment. Geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains and potential shifts in U.S. monetary policy add layers of volatility. These ETFs operate within a high-beta environment where concentrated exposure to mega-cap technology names amplifies sensitivity to both positive catalysts and adverse developments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differentials among the three ETFs have stemmed primarily from their distinct exposure profiles. MAGX and QQQU, with diversified Magnificent Seven baskets, have shown relatively more stable trend consistency compared to TSLL’s single-stock leverage. TSLL’s higher concentration has led to greater volatility and larger drawdowns during Tesla-specific events. All three products exhibit elevated sensitivity to macro factors such as growth stock rotations and AI-related news flow, with daily reset mechanics causing compounding effects over multi-day periods that diverge from simple 2X multiples.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, MAGX would likely receive the highest probabilistic preference from Tickeron’s AI due to its balanced diversification across the Magnificent Seven, competitive expense ratio, and established framework for delivering targeted leveraged exposure within a multi-name basket. This positioning offers a relatively more favorable risk-adjusted profile compared to the narrower focus of TSLL or the marginally higher cost of QQQU, though all remain high-risk tactical instruments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLL has more net assets: 3.78B vs. QQQU (75.4M) and MAGX (64.3M). QQQU has a higher annual dividend yield than MAGX and TSLL: QQQU (14.134) vs MAGX (4.198) and TSLL (-45.876). MAGX was incepted earlier than QQQU and TSLL: MAGX (3 years) vs QQQU (3 years) and TSLL (4 years). TSLL (0.83) has a lower expense ratio than MAGX (0.95) and QQQU (0.98).
MAGXQQQUTSLL
Gain YTD4.19814.134-45.876
Net Assets64.3M75.4M3.78B
Total Expense Ratio0.950.980.83
TurnoverN/A223.00101.00
Yield2.040.103.84
Fund Existence3 years3 years4 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAGXQQQUTSLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
MAGX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QQQU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEM52.691.52
+2.97%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM)
TUG47.801.11
+2.37%
STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG)
PTMC39.790.16
+0.40%
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC)
PLUL7.130.01
+0.15%
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL)
BITI17.01-1.17
-6.44%
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI)

QQQU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QQQU and MSFT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QQQU and MSFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQQU
1D Price
Change %
QQQU100%
+6.68%
MSFT - QQQU
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
META - QQQU
8%
Poorly correlated
+11.43%
GOOGL - QQQU
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
AAPL - QQQU
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
AMZN - QQQU
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
More

TSLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLL has been closely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSLL jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLL
1D Price
Change %
TSLL100%
+5.75%
TSLA - TSLL
100%
Closely correlated
+3.00%