Advertisement
MPB or NTRS or PCB
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MPB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and PCB’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- MPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTRS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MPB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PCB’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MPB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NTRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PCB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MPB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.28% price change this week, while NTRS (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.46% , and PCB (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
MPB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
NTRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
PCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Investment Managers (+1.04% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| MPB | NTRS | PCB | |
| Capitalization | 332M | 18B | 233M |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 1.894 | 23.020 | 8.455 |
| P/E Ratio | 8.80 | 17.41 | 7.48 |
| Revenue | 168M | 6.77B | 99.2M |
| Total Cash | 52.5M | 4.79B | 22.7M |
| Total Debt | 254M | 13.4B | 59.1M |
MPB | NTRS | PCB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 75 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 44 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 9 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 5 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 28 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PCB's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (42) and is significantly better than the same rating for NTRS (100). This means that PCB's stock grew similarly to MPB’s and significantly faster than NTRS’s over the last 12 months.
PCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NTRS (44) and is in the same range as MPB (45). This means that PCB's stock grew similarly to NTRS’s and similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (23) and is in the same range as PCB (35). This means that NTRS's stock grew similarly to MPB’s and similarly to PCB’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCB (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MPB (52). This means that NTRS's stock grew somewhat faster than PCB’s and somewhat faster than MPB’s over the last 12 months.
NTRS's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PCB (45) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MPB (70). This means that NTRS's stock grew similarly to PCB’s and somewhat faster than MPB’s over the last 12 months.
| MPB | NTRS | PCB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 60% | 8 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 17 days ago 60% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
MPB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPB has been closely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPB jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPB | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| HBNC - MPB | 81% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| TCBK - MPB | 79% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| UVSP - MPB | 79% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BRKL - MPB | 79% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| CAC - MPB | 79% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||
NTRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTRS has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTRS jumps, then STT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTRS | 100% | -1.82% | ||
| STT - NTRS | 81% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| AMP - NTRS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PFG - NTRS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| BN - NTRS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| TROW - NTRS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
More | ||||