PSLV
Price
$21.71
Change
+$0.49 (+2.31%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
12.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIVR
Price
$63.01
Change
+$0.99 (+1.60%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
4.53B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLV
Price
$59.93
Change
+$0.96 (+1.63%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
31.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSLV or SIVR or SLV

PSLV vs SIVR vs SLV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) vs. abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) vs. iShares Silver Trust (SLV)

Key Takeaways

  • Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV), abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR), and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) all provide direct exposure to physical silver bullion with no futures or derivatives overlay.
  • SIVR maintains the lowest expense ratio at 0.30%, offering a structural cost advantage over SLV at 0.50% and PSLV at approximately 0.51%.
  • PSLV operates as a closed-end trust, which can result in premiums or discounts to net asset value, while SIVR and SLV function as grantor trusts with shares typically trading closer to underlying silver value.
  • All three vehicles hold 100% allocated physical silver bars, resulting in identical sector exposure limited to a single commodity with no equity diversification.
  • Liquidity profiles differ, with SLV generally exhibiting the highest trading volume among the three, followed by SIVR and PSLV.
  • Structural variations in fees, vehicle type, and secondary-market behavior create distinct risk-adjusted positioning despite identical underlying silver exposure.

Introduction

Investors seeking silver exposure often evaluate Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV), abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR), and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) because these products compete directly within the physical silver segment. Each vehicle tracks the spot price of silver bullion minus expenses rather than an equity index or active strategy. The comparison highlights differences in fund structure, cost efficiency, and liquidity that matter for long-term positioning in precious metals portfolios. In the current environment of industrial demand growth and macroeconomic uncertainty, understanding these structural distinctions helps investors select the vehicle best aligned with their cost sensitivity and trading preferences.

Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) Overview

Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) is a closed-end trust whose investment objective is to hold substantially all assets in physical silver bullion stored in allocated form. The trust maintains one primary holding consisting of London Good Delivery silver bars, resulting in 100% sector allocation to silver with no equity or fixed-income components. Its expense ratio stands at approximately 0.51%. As a closed-end structure, PSLV issues a fixed number of units and may trade at a premium or discount to the value of its silver holdings. The trust does not engage in active management or rebalancing beyond maintaining physical silver custody.

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) Overview

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) seeks to track the performance of the price of physical silver bullion, less the trust’s expenses. The fund holds allocated physical silver bars in secure vaults and maintains a single holding representing 100% silver exposure. Its net expense ratio is 0.30%, the lowest among the three vehicles. SIVR operates as a grantor trust listed on NYSE Arca, providing daily transparency of holdings and typically trading in close alignment with the underlying silver price. The structure includes no active management or derivatives.

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) Overview

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) aims to reflect the performance of the price of silver before payment of trust expenses and liabilities. The trust holds physical silver bullion as its sole asset, delivering 100% sector allocation to the commodity. Its expense ratio is 0.50%. SLV functions as a grantor trust with shares trading on NYSE Arca and benefits from high liquidity due to substantial average daily volume. Like the other vehicles, it employs no active strategy or rebalancing beyond custody of allocated silver bars.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The silver market is influenced by industrial demand from solar energy, electronics, and electric vehicles alongside traditional investment and jewelry uses. Macroeconomic factors including interest rates, inflation expectations, and U.S. dollar strength affect silver prices across all vehicles. Geopolitical developments and supply constraints from mining operations also contribute to price volatility. Regulatory oversight of physical commodity trusts remains stable, with no material changes affecting these structures in recent market cycles. Capital flows into precious metals vehicles tend to increase during periods of economic uncertainty.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months and market cycles, the three vehicles have exhibited closely aligned price movements driven by silver spot prices, with minor divergences attributable to expense ratios and structural features. SIVR’s lower fees can result in marginally better net returns over extended periods compared with higher-cost peers. PSLV’s closed-end nature introduces additional volatility from potential premiums or discounts, while SLV’s higher liquidity supports tighter bid-ask spreads for frequent traders. All three demonstrate similar sensitivity to macroeconomic drivers such as real yields and industrial demand trends, with concentration in a single commodity creating comparable risk profiles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Professional and retail investors can leverage this platform to refine ETF comparisons and uncover opportunities aligned with specific criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) due to its lowest expense ratio, grantor trust structure that minimizes premiums or discounts, and competitive liquidity. Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) offers distinct closed-end features that may appeal in specific premium/discount scenarios, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) provides the strongest liquidity profile. Selection ultimately depends on an investor’s emphasis on cost efficiency versus trading volume.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLV has more net assets: 31.7B vs. PSLV (12.6B) and SIVR (4.53B). SIVR and SLV has a higher annual dividend yield than PSLV: SIVR (-6.845) and SLV (-6.970) vs PSLV (-8.203). PSLV was incepted earlier than SIVR and SLV: PSLV (16 years) vs SIVR (17 years) and SLV (20 years).
PSLVSIVRSLV
Gain YTD-8.203-6.845-6.970
Net Assets12.6B4.53B31.7B
Total Expense RatioN/A0.300.50
Turnover0.00N/AN/A
Yield0.000.000.00
Fund Existence16 years17 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSLVSIVRSLV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
PSLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIVR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBIL49.850.01
+0.03%
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL)
GMAY43.820.01
+0.01%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY)
GVLE47.94-0.03
-0.06%
Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE)
IBDV21.30-0.04
-0.19%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV)
ETFT9.80-0.07
-0.71%
Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT)