SHO
Price
$9.18
Change
+$0.56 (+6.50%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.27B
80 days until earnings call
SKT
Price
$31.64
Change
+$1.45 (+4.80%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.2B
80 days until earnings call
STAG
Price
$35.43
Change
+$0.82 (+2.37%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.84B
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SHO or SKT or STAG

Header iconSHO vs SKT vs STAG Comparison
Open Charts SHO vs SKT vs STAGBanner chart's image
Sunstone Hotel Investors
Price$9.18
Change+$0.56 (+6.50%)
Volume$69.82K
Capitalization2.27B
Tanger
Price$31.64
Change+$1.45 (+4.80%)
Volume$11.74K
Capitalization3.2B
Stag Industrial
Price$35.43
Change+$0.82 (+2.37%)
Volume$9.11K
Capitalization6.84B
SHO vs SKT vs STAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2025
Stock price -- (SHO: $9.17SKT: $31.64STAG: $35.43)
Brand notoriety: SHO and STAG are not notable and SKT is notable
The three companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHO: 122%, SKT: 155%, STAG: 127%
Market capitalization -- SHO: $2.27B, SKT: $3.2B, STAG: $6.84B
$SHO is valued at $2.27B, while SKT has a market capitalization of $3.2B, and STAG's market capitalization is $6.84B. The market cap for tickers in this @Real Estate Investment Trusts ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and STAG’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SHO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SKT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKT is a better buy in the long-term than STAG, which in turn is a better option than SHO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and STAG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SKT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STAG is a better buy in the short-term than SHO, which in turn is a better option than SKT.

Price Growth

SHO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +6.88% price change this week, while SKT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +8.02% , and STAG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price fluctuated +5.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SKT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

STAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.81% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STAG($6.84B) has a higher market cap than SKT($3.2B) and SHO($2.27B). STAG has higher P/E ratio than SKT and SHO: STAG (35.18) vs SKT (31.89) and SHO (11.86). STAG YTD gains are higher at: 3.818 vs. SKT (-9.969) and SHO (-26.497). STAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 570M vs. SHO (387M) and SKT (261M). SHO has more cash in the bank: 426M vs. SKT (22M) and STAG (20.7M). SHO has less debt than SKT and STAG: SHO (831M) vs SKT (1.53B) and STAG (2.66B). SHO has higher revenues than STAG and SKT: SHO (986M) vs STAG (708M) and SKT (464M).
SHOSKTSTAG
Capitalization2.27B3.2B6.84B
EBITDA387M261M570M
Gain YTD-26.497-9.9693.818
P/E Ratio11.8631.8935.18
Revenue986M464M708M
Total Cash426M22M20.7M
Total Debt831M1.53B2.66B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHO vs SKT vs STAG: Fundamental Ratings
SHO
SKT
STAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
222245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82547
SMR RATING
1..100
885379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
796050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
23181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKT's Valuation (67) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (67) and is in the same range as SHO (69). This means that SKT's stock grew similarly to STAG’s and similarly to SHO’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STAG (47) and is significantly better than the same rating for SHO (82). This means that SKT's stock grew somewhat faster than STAG’s and significantly faster than SHO’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's SMR Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as STAG (79) and is somewhat better than the same rating for SHO (88). This means that SKT's stock grew similarly to STAG’s and somewhat faster than SHO’s over the last 12 months.

STAG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SKT (60) and is in the same range as SHO (79). This means that STAG's stock grew similarly to SKT’s and similarly to SHO’s over the last 12 months.

SHO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SKT (31) and is significantly better than the same rating for STAG (81). This means that SHO's stock grew similarly to SKT’s and significantly faster than STAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOSKTSTAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGN4.320.07
+1.53%
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust
ESGE36.060.20
+0.56%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
RSBT15.800.08
+0.48%
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futs ETF
MUE9.830.03
+0.31%
Blackrock Muniholdings Quality Fund II
JCHI47.16-0.15
-0.32%
JPMorgan Active China ETF

SHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHO has been closely correlated with DRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHO jumps, then DRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHO
1D Price
Change %
SHO100%
+2.99%
DRH - SHO
85%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
XHR - SHO
84%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
RLJ - SHO
82%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
PEB - SHO
80%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
PK - SHO
79%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
More

SKT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKT has been closely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SKT jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKT
1D Price
Change %
SKT100%
+1.11%
SPG - SKT
74%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
MAC - SKT
71%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
RPT - SKT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BRX - SKT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
IVT - SKT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More

STAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STAG has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STAG jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STAG
1D Price
Change %
STAG100%
+2.22%
EGP - STAG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
FR - STAG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
LXP - STAG
85%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
PLD - STAG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
TRNO - STAG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
More