Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) — formerly Cedar Fair, L.P., renamed in July 2024 after its merger with Six Flags — carries one of the widest target ranges on Wall Street. Reviewing current, attributable estimates yields a spread from a low of $10 (Mizuho Securities, which downgraded the stock to Sell in August 2026) to a high of $28 (Guggenheim), with a roughly $33 outlier from Texas Capital Securities set earlier in the year.
The calculated mean of these targets lands near $20.50 to $21.30, which rounds to a clean central target of $21. Notable estimates include Citi's James Hardiman at $13 (Hold), Goldman Sachs near $15 (Hold), Truist's C. Patrick Scholes at $22 (Buy), J.P. Morgan at $22 (Neutral), Stifel and Oppenheimer both at $23, and UBS at $27 (Buy). Because the range is so dispersed, the average is best read as a rough midpoint of divergent views rather than a precise forecast.
The trajectory has been decidedly negative. J.P. Morgan upgraded the stock to Neutral from Underweight in May 2026, but most firms have since cut targets repeatedly as results deteriorated. No single figure should be treated as a guarantee, and the gap between the cautious $10–$13 cluster and the bullish $22–$28 cluster signals genuine disagreement about the company's turnaround.
Shares closed near $11.92 in mid-October 2026, down sharply from a 52-week high of $27.37 and hovering just above the 52-week low of $10.45. Reaching the $21 central target would require a rise of roughly 76%, which is a very large move relative to the stock's recent history.
The path is complicated by deteriorating fundamentals. For the quarter ended June 28, 2026, the company posted a net loss of about $202.6 million, versus a $99.7 million loss a year earlier, on revenue of $864.9 million, down 7% year over year. Adjusted EPS of $0.14 missed the $0.29 consensus estimate. Positively, same-park revenue rose 2.4% and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) increased 7%, suggesting the remaining portfolio is stabilizing even as the consolidated figures remain weak.
Several factors could lift shares. Same-park metrics improved in the latest quarter, and management has been streamlining the portfolio, including selling seven non-core parks to EPR Properties (EPR) and winding down a Maryland property. Activist investor Jana Partners has publicly urged the board to hire a bank and explore a sale, a catalyst that briefly sent shares higher in after-hours trading. A strategic transaction, renewed attendance growth, or meaningful margin improvement would all strengthen the case that the stock's depressed valuation underestimates its asset value.
The obstacles are substantial. Consolidated revenue and attendance are declining, net losses are widening on higher interest expense and a large tax provision, and analysts have slashed earnings estimates — full-year 2026 EPS (earnings per share) estimates have fallen to about negative $3.02 from roughly negative $0.38 three months earlier. The company carries significant debt, and its shares face heavy short interest. If a sale does not materialize and demand remains soft, the cautious end of the analyst range reflects a view that the stock could remain depressed or fall further.
From a technical standpoint, the stock has been in a sustained downtrend, down about 45% over the trailing year and more than 20% year to date. The $10.45 area marks a key support level at the recent 52-week low, while psychological resistance sits near the $13–$15 zone, where several cautious analyst targets cluster. A durable recovery would likely need to clear those levels before the higher $20–$28 targets become relevant. The wide gap between support and the average target underscores how far the price would have to travel.
Analyst price targets generally reflect a roughly 12-month horizon, though the rapid revisions here suggest estimates remain fluid. The next earnings report, expected in early November 2026, will be closely watched, along with any formal response to activist pressure, updates on the strategic review or a possible sale process, attendance trends, and changes to analyst targets. Debt refinancing and same-park EBITDA progression are also central to whether estimates stabilize.
Traders monitoring a volatile, catalyst-driven name like FUN can also track signals from Tickeron's AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals. The tool uses artificial intelligence to continuously scan thousands of stocks and ETFs and generate Buy, Sell, or Hold signals based on shifting market conditions, technical behavior, and AI-driven analysis. It is designed to help traders spot opportunities, monitor existing positions, and identify changing trends more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals to see how automated monitoring can complement your own research process.
Whether FUN can reach $21 ultimately depends on whether the company can convert its same-park stabilization into consolidated profitability or deliver a value-unlocking transaction. The target, an average of current analyst estimates, requires a very large move of roughly 76% from recent levels. Supporters point to asset value, cost discipline, and activist engagement, while skeptics emphasize widening losses, falling estimates, and heavy leverage. With targets ranging from $10 to $28, investors face an unusually wide spread of outcomes. The $21 figure is a calculated midpoint, not a forecast, and should be weighed alongside the company's coming earnings, any strategic-review developments, and the durability of the recent operational improvements.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUN has been loosely correlated with PRKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUN jumps, then PRKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUN | 100% | +2.40% | ||
| PRKS - FUN | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| PTON - FUN | 38% Loosely correlated | +4.20% | ||
| GOLF - FUN | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| LTH - FUN | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
| AS - FUN | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||