The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category ModerateAllocation
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMF | 119.93 | 1.22 | +1.03% |
| SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | |||
| CADJPY | 106.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Canadian Dollar - Japan Yen | |||
| CVY | 26.40 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | |||
| BDCX | 34.55 | -0.22 | -0.64% |
| ETRACS Qrtly Py 1.5X Lvgd Wls Fg BDC ETN | |||
| FCOM | 62.88 | -0.42 | -0.66% |
| Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICMVX has been closely correlated with CLBFX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICMVX jumps, then CLBFX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICMVX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICMVX | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLBFX - ICMVX | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| RLBEX - ICMVX | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBCX - ICMVX | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBAX - ICMVX | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BALCX - ICMVX | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||