IonQ Inc sells access to several quantum computers of various qubit capacities and is in the process of researching and developing technologies for quantum computers with increasing computational capabilities... Show more
IonQ is one of the few publicly traded pure-play quantum computing companies, and its trapped-ion approach has historically been associated with high gate fidelity, an important measure of computing accuracy. The company is now broadening well beyond compute access: its portfolio spans quantum networking, sensing, and security, and management has introduced a multi-product revenue metric to track how deeply it penetrates customer accounts.
The most consequential strategic move is vertical integration. The roughly $1.8 billion acquisition of SkyWater Technology, a U.S.-based semiconductor foundry, gives IonQ control over chip fabrication, packaging, and deployment. Management has framed this as a "merchant supplier" model, in which SkyWater can serve IonQ's own roadmap while also supplying other quantum players across modalities. The Nexus Photonics acquisition adds integrated photonics capabilities, extending the foundry strategy toward optical and networking components.
Structurally, IonQ's $3.1 billion cash position reduces near-term financing risk and provides runway to invest through an uneven adoption cycle. However, the company still trades at a price-to-sales (P/S) multiple far above the semiconductor industry median, meaning the market is already pricing in substantial future execution.
Several developments could shape investor sentiment in the coming quarters. The first is the 256-qubit Superion platform. IonQ has pre-sold its first chip-based 256-qubit system and expects customer commissioning to begin in 2027. Demonstrating this technology at year-end and transitioning from component-level to system-level testing will be closely watched milestones, because they validate the shift from laser-based to electronic qubit control.
The SkyWater integration is another critical catalyst. Successfully absorbing the foundry, retaining its neutral-fab customer base, and converting fabrication capability into repeatable production cadence will influence both revenue and margins. Management's raised 2026 outlook—which includes SkyWater contributions—will be tested against actual delivery.
On the analyst front, sentiment has become more nuanced. Consensus recommendations remain largely "Buy," and the average 12-month price target sits in the mid-$60s range, with individual targets spanning roughly $41.85 to $100. Recent actions illustrate the dispersion: Morgan Stanley has maintained a more cautious Hold stance while trimming its target, whereas firms such as Rosenblatt, Mizuho, Jefferies, Wedbush, and Bank of America have maintained Buy ratings, with targets ranging from the low-$50s to $100. This widening spread signals that the debate has shifted from "is quantum real?" toward "how fast and how profitably can IonQ scale?"
Quantum computing sits at the intersection of technology policy, government procurement, and enterprise digital transformation. Federal programs—including quantum funding initiatives and defense-adjacent contracts—provide a demand tailwind that is relatively insulated from consumer spending cycles. IonQ's wins with agencies such as the Space Development Agency and DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) illustrate this channel.
Interest rates and broader risk appetite remain relevant. As an early-stage, high-multiple, cash-burning company, IonQ's valuation is sensitive to discount-rate assumptions. A higher-rate environment raises the required return on future cash flows, which can pressure valuations of long-duration growth stories. Conversely, improving sentiment around transformative technologies could support multiple expansion.
Geopolitics also plays a role. Quantum capabilities are increasingly viewed as strategically important, and U.S. policy has emphasized domestic quantum supply chains. IonQ's U.S.-based foundry positions it favorably in this framework, though competition from international players and other modalities—superconducting, photonic, and neutral-atom approaches—remains intense.
The Trend Prediction Engine is an AI-powered forecasting tool designed to help traders assess whether a stock, ETF (exchange-traded fund), or other asset may trend bullish, bearish, or sideways over the coming week or month. It is built to help users spot developing trends, evaluate possible breakouts or reversals, and explore predictions across a wide range of tradable instruments. The product includes searchable prediction categories, historical context, and alert-oriented functionality to support timely decision-making. For investors monitoring fast-moving names like IONQ, tools that organize forward-looking signals can add useful context to fundamental research. Consider exploring the Trend Prediction Engine to see how its models read the current setup.
Looking toward the end of 2026 and into 2027, the pivotal question is whether IonQ can convert its expanding remaining performance obligations (RPOs)—contracted future revenue—into on-schedule deliveries and recurring income. The company ended the first quarter with roughly $470 million in RPOs, a dramatic rise from the prior year, giving it a much larger contracted base to draw on.
The long-term roadmap is ambitious: 256 qubits in the near term, a 10,000-qubit system in development, and an ultimate goal of millions of qubits. Each step requires progress in error correction, chip fabrication, and system integration. Success in demonstrating fault tolerance at scale would be a structural inflection point for the entire sector.
Margin trajectory is another theme. IonQ continues to guide for a substantial full-year adjusted EBITDA loss, as it reinvests in research and development, go-to-market expansion, and the SkyWater relationship. The path to profitability depends on rising high-margin cloud utilization and multi-product adoption, not just headline system sales. Competitive threats, regulatory developments, and the pace of enterprise adoption will all shape whether consensus expectations—currently optimistic but divided—prove durable.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MOVR.X | 1.081292 | 0.032801 | +3.13% |
| Moonriver cryptocurrency | |||
| FPFD | 20.40 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) | |||
| FLOKI.X | 0.000022 | N/A | -0.04% |
| FLOKI cryptocurrency | |||
| MEDX | 37.83 | -0.24 | -0.64% |
| Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) | |||
| ANKR.X | 0.003849 | -0.000062 | -1.57% |
| Ankr cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IONQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ | 100% | +6.46% | ||
| RGTI - IONQ | 86% Closely correlated | +3.89% | ||
| QBTS - IONQ | 84% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| UMAC - IONQ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| OSS - IONQ | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| SSYS - IONQ | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IONQ | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| IONQ | 100% | +6.46% |
| IONQ (4 stocks) | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.38% |
| Computer Processing Hardware (39 stocks) | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.60% |
Industry ComputerProcessingHardware
IONQ moved below its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 49 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IONQ as a result. In 69 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IONQ turned negative on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 88%.
The 10-day moving average for IONQ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IONQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
The Aroon Indicator for IONQ entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IONQ's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 21 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +4.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IONQ advanced for three days, in 233 of 273 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
IONQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 47 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.652) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.276). P/E Ratio (-7.749) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (51.020) is also within normal values, averaging (51.774).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 72 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. IONQ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. IONQ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.