Founded in 2007, MongoDB is a vendor of a document-oriented database that accelerates the development processes of new applications... Show more
MongoDB is positioned as a modern, document-based database platform that competes by unifying operational data, search, vector search, and AI-powered retrieval within a single architecture. This integration is its core differentiator: enterprises building contemporary and AI-driven applications can avoid stitching together multiple point solutions. The Atlas cloud platform now accounts for roughly three-quarters of revenue and is the primary driver of growth, while the on-premise Enterprise Advanced offering gives the company access to regulated industries that prefer to keep mission-critical data in-house.
The company's medium-term positioning hinges on its ability to become the "memory layer" for AI applications. Because its flexible document model handles structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, it is well suited to the vector and embedding workloads that large language models generate. Management has articulated a clear ambition — that software "agents" should favor MongoDB as much as human developers do — backed by a product roadmap emphasizing machine-friendly APIs (application programming interfaces) and autonomous scaling. Competitive pressure, however, remains structural: hyperscale cloud providers and open-source alternatives offer credible database options, and MongoDB must continually invest to defend its developer-centric moat.
Several forward-looking catalysts could shape investor sentiment over the coming quarters. Upcoming earnings releases remain the most important near-term events, particularly as management guides for continued Atlas expansion and AI-related workload growth. Investors will watch remaining performance obligations (RPO — contracted revenue not yet recognized) and billings as leading indicators of enterprise demand.
Product and platform announcements at MongoDB.local conferences are another recurring catalyst, where the company has signaled it will unveil new AI-era innovations. The planned FedRAMP High certification, combined with the ClarityDB Solutions acquisition, could accelerate penetration of the U.S. federal market and other compliance-sensitive sectors. Capital allocation decisions — including the potential to initiate share repurchases as free cash flow (FCF) scales — may also come into focus.
Analyst activity has turned notably more constructive. According to consensus data, MongoDB carries a "Buy" rating with an average 12-month price target near $457, set within a broad range from roughly $273 to $565. Recent revisions have skewed optimistic, with firms such as Bank of America, Citi, Guggenheim, Wells Fargo, and Evercore ISI either raising targets or initiating coverage with outperform-style ratings, reflecting growing confidence in AI-led demand and Atlas momentum. A minority of analysts maintain a more cautious stance, citing valuation and competitive uncertainty.
MongoDB's trajectory is closely tied to enterprise software spending cycles, which are themselves sensitive to interest rates and inflation. A higher-for-longer rate environment can pressure technology budgets, but database modernization and AI infrastructure are increasingly treated as strategic rather than discretionary spending, offering some insulation. The broader technology adoption trend is a clear tailwind: as organizations consolidate fragmented data stacks and deploy AI agents, demand for a unified operational data platform should rise.
The regulatory climate cuts both ways. Heightened data-sovereignty and compliance requirements favor vendors with strong security credentials and on-premise options, which supports Enterprise Advanced demand. At the same time, geopolitical tensions and evolving AI governance frameworks introduce execution and compliance costs. Competition from hyperscalers remains the most significant macro-structural risk, as integrated cloud vendors could bundle competing database services.
Investors seeking a data-driven read on short-term direction may find Tickeron's Trend Prediction Engine useful. This AI-powered forecasting tool helps traders identify whether a stock, ETF (exchange-traded fund), or other asset may move bullish, bearish, or sideways over the next week or month. Designed to support trend spotting, the engine highlights possible breakouts or reversals and offers predictions across a broad universe of tradable instruments, with searchable categories, historical context, and alert-oriented functionality. For those tracking MongoDB's developing momentum, exploring these AI-driven signals can add a complementary layer of context to fundamental analysis.
Looking into 2026 and beyond, MongoDB's long-term investment case rests on three structural themes. First, AI monetization: if AI-native companies continue to standardize on Atlas as they scale, MongoDB could convert early adopters into durable, expanding revenue streams. Management has emphasized that AI-native demand is not concentrated in any single customer, reducing single-client risk. Second, margin sustainability: as Atlas gains scale and the sales mix tilts toward recurring, higher-margin subscriptions, the company's operating leverage should improve. MongoDB has already begun generating positive free cash flow, and consistent GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) profitability would mark a meaningful inflection.
Third, expansion into regulated and federal markets broadens the addressable opportunity beyond traditional developers. The push toward FedRAMP High certification and the on-premise parity roadmap for Enterprise Advanced target industries — financial services, healthcare, government — where data-residency and compliance requirements are rising.
Consensus expectations currently imply sustained double-digit revenue growth, with analysts generally anticipating continued Atlas momentum and gradual margin expansion. However, MongoDB trades at a premium valuation, meaning long-term performance will depend on execution against AI-related expectations and disciplined cost management. Competitive threats from hyperscalers, the pace of AI adoption, and macroeconomic shifts in enterprise spending remain the key variables that could alter this outlook.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
a developer of MongoDB database
Industry ComputerCommunications
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been closely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDB | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| SNOW - MDB | 67% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| COIN - MDB | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| CLSK - MDB | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| HUBS - MDB | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| RIOT - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| MDB | 100% | +1.77% |
| MDB (2 stocks) | 87% Closely correlated | +0.75% |
| Computer Communications (167 stocks) | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.52% |
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where MDB advanced for three days, in 237 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 60 cases where MDB's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 28, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MDB as a result. In 69 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for MDB turned negative on September 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 80%.
MDB moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MDB crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MDB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
MDB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MDB entered a downward trend on October 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MDB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to slightly better than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.050) is normal, around the industry mean (18.522). P/E Ratio (471.380) is within average values for comparable stocks, (158.311). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.654) is also within normal values, averaging (3.648). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.004) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (11.025) is also within normal values, averaging (104.490).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MDB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.