Advertisement
CLSK vs MDB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. MongoDB (MDB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK operates as a Bitcoin mining firm expanding into AI data centers, while MDB provides database software with strong cloud and AI workload exposure.
- CLSK reported a Q3 fiscal 2026 net loss of $239.8 million amid Bitcoin impairment charges, contrasted by a $6.6 billion long-term AI lease announcement.
- MDB has delivered robust recent performance with shares rising approximately 39% over the past month amid analyst upgrades tied to AI-driven demand.
- Sector contrast highlights CLSK’s higher volatility linked to cryptocurrency and infrastructure execution risks versus MDB’s more stable software growth profile.
- Market positioning shows CLSK with a market capitalization near $3.1 billion compared to MDB’s approximately $36 billion scale.
- Relative momentum favors MDB in recent weeks due to consistent revenue growth exceeding 20% year-over-year and positive sentiment shifts.
Introduction
This comparison examines CleanSpark (CLSK) and MongoDB (MDB) to provide traders and investors with an objective view of their relative performance and positioning in the current market. CleanSpark focuses on Bitcoin mining with diversification into data infrastructure, while MongoDB delivers database solutions increasingly applied to artificial intelligence workloads. The analysis suits active traders monitoring volatility and momentum alongside longer-term investors evaluating growth drivers across cryptocurrency-adjacent and enterprise software sectors. Broader time references highlight developments over recent weeks and months to maintain relevance.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. engages in Bitcoin mining and is advancing data center development for artificial intelligence and high-performance computing applications. In recent market activity, the stock has shown significant volatility following its fiscal third-quarter 2026 results, which included revenue of $138.0 million and a net loss of $239.8 million driven largely by a substantial Bitcoin impairment. The company announced a 20-year, $6.6 billion triple-net lease for its Sandersville, Georgia campus, intended to provide more stable contracted revenue. Shares have fluctuated with Bitcoin price movements and sector sentiment, trading near the $12 level amid mixed reactions to earnings and the infrastructure pivot. Liquidity remains supported by cash and Bitcoin holdings, though execution on large-scale projects introduces ongoing considerations for performance.
MDB Overview and Recent Performance
MongoDB, Inc. develops a document-oriented database platform with its Atlas cloud service serving as a key growth area for modern applications, including artificial intelligence workloads. In recent market activity, the stock has posted strong gains, advancing roughly 39% over the past month to trade near $446–447. Revenue growth has remained robust at approximately 25% year-over-year, supported by multiple analyst price target increases reflecting confidence in AI-related demand. The company maintains a market capitalization around $36 billion and faces an upcoming earnings report. Broader sentiment has benefited from enterprise adoption trends, contributing to relative stability compared to more cyclical sectors despite general market fluctuations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section, based on their distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and ticker sets. Available bots demonstrate varied success metrics, with many showing double-digit returns in optimized scenarios and adaptability across asset classes. This resource helps market participants explore algorithmic approaches tailored to current conditions. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark (CLSK) and MongoDB (MDB) differ markedly in business models: CLSK centers on energy-intensive Bitcoin mining with a strategic shift toward AI data centers, exposing it to cryptocurrency price swings and project financing needs, whereas MDB offers scalable software with recurring revenue from cloud subscriptions. Growth drivers for CLSK include infrastructure leases and Bitcoin holdings, while MDB benefits from expanding AI data platform adoption and consistent quarterly beats. Recent momentum has favored MDB with sustained share price appreciation, in contrast to CLSK’s more pronounced swings tied to Bitcoin and earnings reactions. Risk factors for CLSK encompass higher beta and impairment volatility; MDB faces valuation multiples and competition in the database market. Sector exposure places CLSK at the intersection of crypto and digital infrastructure, while MDB aligns with enterprise software and technology services. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with MDB drawing broader analyst support amid AI themes.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to MongoDB (MDB). The stock’s sustained upward momentum, supported by revenue expansion and AI-related catalysts, contrasts with CleanSpark’s (CLSK) higher volatility and recent earnings pressures. This assessment draws from comparative performance patterns rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and MDB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MDB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.83% price change this week, while MDB (@Computer Communications) price change was -17.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.36%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.
MDB is expected to report earnings on Dec 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.45% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Computer Communications (-1.84% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CLSK | MDB | CLSK / MDB | |
| Capitalization | 3.26B | 29.7B | 11% |
| EBITDA | -572.87M | 115M | -498% |
| Gain YTD | 25.395 | -12.140 | -209% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 519.35 | 1% |
| Revenue | 679M | 2.78B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 795M | 2.41B | 33% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 28.6M | 6,248% |
CLSK | MDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as MDB (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MDB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's SMR Rating (88) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (50) in the null industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (86) in the null industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | MDB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
MDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been closely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDB | 100% | -4.09% | ||
| SNOW - MDB | 67% Closely correlated | -5.41% | ||
| COIN - MDB | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| CLSK - MDB | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| HUBS - MDB | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| RIOT - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
More | ||||