Solid Power Inc develops solid-state battery technology and manufacturing processes... Show more
Solid Power, Inc. is a Louisville, Colorado-based developer of solid-state battery technology for electric vehicles and adjacent markets. The company's core technology is its sulfide-based solid electrolyte material, which is designed to replace the liquid or gel electrolyte used in conventional lithium-ion cells and potentially enable greater energy density, improved safety, and lower cost.
Unlike peers that plan to manufacture complete battery cells, Solid Power's business model centers on selling its electrolyte to cell manufacturers and licensing its cell designs and manufacturing processes. The company has long-standing relationships with automotive and battery partners, including SK On and Samsung SDI, and counts BMW and Ford among its early strategic investors. Investors follow SLDP closely because it is a pure-play, pre-revenue bet on the commercialization of solid-state batteries.
Over the trailing 30 days, SLDP shares fell about 11.7%, sliding from roughly $2.30 to approximately $2.03. The decline was not a single-day event; rather, the stock trended lower through much of October, touching a 52-week low of $1.91 before recovering modestly into early November.
The quarterly picture is similar. The stock began the period near $2.30, climbed to an intra-quarter high around $2.57 in early September, and then gave back those gains, ending the period near $2.03. That leaves the stock roughly flat to modestly lower for the full quarter while exhibiting meaningful volatility, with the September peak followed by a persistent multi-week pullback.
Several factors shaped the recent decline. As a development-stage company with minimal revenue, Solid Power remains highly sensitive to changes in sentiment and progress toward commercialization. Third-quarter results, reported after the market close on November 3, showed a net loss of $0.11 per share and total revenue and grant income of $1.22 million, with product revenue down sharply from the prior-year period.
Management also indicated that a potential electrolyte joint venture in South Korea is taking longer than previously expected, noting that large deals "do move to the right." Combined with the fact that the newly commissioned MOBIUS line's capacity is not yet covered by supply agreements, this softened visibility into when the company will convert its manufacturing progress into commercial revenue.
On the operational side, Solid Power announced in late October that it had begun commissioning MOBIUS, its continuous electrolyte manufacturing pilot line, which is expected to increase annual electrolyte capacity by 150% to roughly 75 metric tons. The company also completed Stage 2 of its ISO 9001 certification process. While these milestones reinforce the execution story, they have not yet reversed the stock's negative trend.
The broader quarterly trend reflects a company advancing its manufacturing roadmap while investors wait for revenue to follow. Through the quarter, Solid Power continued supplying electrolyte to partners such as Samsung SDI and SK On, progressed discussions on a potential Korean production facility, and moved toward year-end commissioning of MOBIUS.
At the same time, the quarter highlighted persistent risks. Revenue remains minimal and highly dependent on collaboration agreements and Department of Energy grant funding tied to MOBIUS construction. The company also reduced its full-year cash investment guidance to $75–85 million, reflecting disciplined spending, but the lack of contracted offtake for new capacity and the delayed joint venture timeline kept the market focused on monetization risk rather than operational milestones.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that monitor thousands of tickers, but only the top-performing and most relevant strategies are featured in this section. The bots vary in approach, trading timeframe, and performance metrics, allowing traders to browse strategies that align with different risk profiles and market conditions. For investors seeking a systematic, data-driven way to follow names like SLDP, reviewing the current lineup of trending bots can offer a useful starting point.
Looking ahead, the most important catalysts include completion of MOBIUS commissioning and operational startup, targeted for the fourth quarter of 2026, and the achievement of ISO 9001 certification, which management expects by year-end. Progress on a potential Korean joint venture and any new or expanded supply agreements with partners will be closely watched, since contracted demand remains the key gap between the company's production capacity and its revenue outlook.
Investors should also monitor cash investment trends, customer cell-design progress that gates electrolyte demand, and any developments in emerging applications such as humanoid robotics, drones, and defense, which management has described as potentially faster-qualifying markets. As a pre-revenue company, Solid Power remains exposed to shifts in EV adoption sentiment, capital-market conditions, and broader sector rotation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SLDP turned positive on November 03, 2026. Looking at past instances where SLDP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SLDP's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 36 of 43 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +14.21% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SLDP advanced for three days, in 194 of 238 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SLDP as a result. In 66 of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
SLDP moved below its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for SLDP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SLDP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
SLDP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for SLDP entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 20 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.902) is normal, around the industry mean (0.781). P/E Ratio (-4.315) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.881). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.494). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (66.225) is also within normal values, averaging (49.456).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. SLDP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SLDP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry AutoPartsOEM