Thomson Reuters is a leading global provider of business information services, delivering trusted data, technology, and expertise to professionals across legal, tax, accounting, risk, compliance, and the news and media sectors... Show more
Thomson Reuters occupies a distinctive position as a content-and-technology company serving legal, tax, audit, corporate, and news professionals. Its "Big 3" segments — Legal Professionals, Corporates, and Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals — collectively generate more than 80% of revenue and anchor the company's competitive moat through proprietary data, deep domain expertise, and deeply embedded workflow tools such as Westlaw, Practical Law, and Checkpoint.
The medium-term strategic question is whether that moat extends into the AI era. Management's answer is to pair its vast, authoritative content with agentic AI — software that can execute multi-step professional tasks rather than simply answer prompts. Early adoption metrics are encouraging: Westlaw Advantage usage and deep-research searches grew more than sevenfold in recent months, and the company reports over one million users of advanced AI features. Yet the competitive landscape is intensifying as large language model (LLM) providers and well-funded startups move into legal and tax automation. Thomson Reuters' edge lies in the verifiability and authority of its outputs — what it calls "fiduciary-grade AI" — a differentiator that matters most to professionals who are legally accountable for their work.
Several upcoming events could reshape investor sentiment:
Thomson Reuters' trajectory is tightly linked to the professional-services economy. Demand for legal, tax, and audit work tends to be resilient across economic cycles, supporting the recurring revenue base that makes up about 80% of sales. However, the company is not immune to macro forces: higher interest rates affect the cost of its debt and the valuation multiple investors assign to software-like businesses, while a slowdown in corporate activity could dampen transactions-driven revenue in areas such as deals and filings.
The dominant structural force is technology adoption. The rapid commercialization of generative AI is simultaneously a growth driver and a threat, compressing margins on commoditized tasks while creating premium value in authoritative, verifiable workflows. Regulatory scrutiny of AI in professional settings — where accuracy, privacy, and accountability are paramount — could favor incumbents like Thomson Reuters that can offer audit-ready, content-grounded outputs.
Tickeron's Trend Prediction Engine is an AI-powered forecasting tool that helps traders assess whether a stock, ETF (exchange-traded fund), or other asset may trend bullish, bearish, or sideways over the coming week or month. It is designed to help users spot developing trends, evaluate possible breakouts or reversals, and explore predictions across a broad universe of tradable instruments. The product includes searchable prediction categories, historical context, and alert-oriented functionality to keep users informed as conditions shift. For investors monitoring TRI's evolving setup, the Trend Prediction Engine can add a data-driven layer of insight to fundamental and strategic analysis.
Looking toward 2026 and beyond, several structural themes will define Thomson Reuters' outlook:
Consensus expectations remain constructive, with an average analyst price target above recent trading levels and a "Buy" recommendation profile, though the dispersion in targets reflects genuine uncertainty about how AI disruption will ultimately net out. The balance between Thomson Reuters' authority-driven moat and the commoditizing force of general-purpose AI will likely remain the defining variable for the stock's future outlook.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRI has been closely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRI jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| RELX - TRI | 68% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| EXPO - TRI | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| LZ - TRI | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| VRSK - TRI | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| CPRT - TRI | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRI | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| TRI | 100% | +0.10% |
| TRI (2 stocks) | 97% Closely correlated | +0.43% |
| Office Equipment/Supplies (45 stocks) | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.99% |
| Producer Manufacturing (346 stocks) | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.99% |
a provider of on-line information and publishing services
Industry OfficeEquipmentSupplies
TRI saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on November 03, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 39 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 23 of the 39 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 59%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for TRI moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 39 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 18 of the 39 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 46%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on TRI as a result. In 43 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TRI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
TRI broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
TRI moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for TRI crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 5 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 42%.
Following a +7.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TRI advanced for three days, in 177 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 107 of 237 cases where TRI Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 45%.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. TRI’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.384) is normal, around the industry mean (5.887). P/E Ratio (29.887) is within average values for comparable stocks, (33.618). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.223) is also within normal values, averaging (1.946). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.025) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.711) is also within normal values, averaging (9.907).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TRI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.