This stock comparison examines TRI and VRSK, two leaders in data analytics and professional services within the Industrials sector. Investors seeking exposure to information technology and risk management solutions may find value in evaluating their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. Amid recent market volatility, both have demonstrated resilience, supported by shareholder returns and upcoming earnings. Traders focused on low-volatility names with strong fundamentals, as well as those monitoring AI-enhanced workflows in professional services, will benefit from this head-to-head analysis of business models, recent momentum, and sentiment shifts.
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) provides content-driven technology solutions across legal, tax, accounting, and news segments. With a market capitalization of approximately $39.8 billion, it serves professionals globally through integrated platforms enhanced by generative AI. In recent market activity, TRI stock has traded stably around $90, with a modest 0.7% decline over the past month amid broader sector rotations. A mid-April dip to the low $80s reflected temporary profit-taking, followed by recovery driven by announcements of a $600 million share repurchase and proposed capital return, alongside analyst upgrades to Buy ratings. Low beta (0.19) underscores its defensive positioning, bolstered by Q4 2025 earnings beats and full-year 2026 guidance for 7.5%-8% revenue growth. Upcoming Q1 results on May 5 further support positive sentiment.
Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) delivers data analytics and technology to the insurance industry, including underwriting, claims, and catastrophe modeling tools. Its $23.2 billion market cap reflects a focused expertise in risk assessment. Over recent weeks, VRSK shares fluctuated between $164 and $185, ending the past month down about 1.65% as investors positioned ahead of Q1 earnings on April 29. A sharp mid-April pullback gave way to rebound, influenced by a $1.5 billion accelerated share repurchase and partnerships like Roofr for insurance estimates. Analyst previews highlight expected EPS growth to $1.76, though some reports note challenges in mid-cap peers. Higher beta (0.82) indicates moderate sensitivity to market swings, with recent reports on elevated insurance risks adding context to performance.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots curated from over 350 available, each designed for specific market conditions, strategies, and asset classes like stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ machine learning for real-time signals, with virtual agents offering automated risk management and signal agents requiring no minimum balance. Performance stats vary widely: annualized returns range from +15% to +127%, win rates 55%-88%, profit factors 1.5-6.9, and trade durations from minutes to months. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with +90% returns on tickers like SOXL and NVDA portfolios yielding +70%. Diverse styles suit day traders to long-term investors, adapting to volatility in tech and industrials. Explore these high-performing options to enhance your strategy.
TRI and VRSK share data-centric business models but diverge in focus: TRI's broad ecosystem spans legal (research workflows), corporates (compliance AI), and Reuters News, driving diversified growth; VRSK excels in niche insurance analytics (underwriting, claims fraud). Growth drivers include AI integration for both, though TRI benefits from regulatory tailwinds in tax/legal, while VRSK leverages catastrophe modeling amid climate risks. Recent momentum favors TRI's steadier trend and YTD outperformance. Risk factors: TRI's lower beta offers stability but print segment exposure; VRSK faces insurance cycle volatility. Market sentiment tilts positive on buybacks, with comparable P/E ratios (~27) and strong ROE (~12%). Trade-offs hinge on diversification versus specialization.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward TRI for its superior relative stability, evidenced by lower beta, consistent recent recovery, and stronger YTD positioning amid share repurchases and growth guidance. While VRSK holds appeal pre-earnings with higher EPS, TRI's trend consistency and defensive traits suggest higher probability of outperformance in volatile conditions, aligning with AI trend-detection patterns in low-volatility data sectors.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TRI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRSK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
TRI (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -4.87% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was -6.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.95%.
VRSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Data Processing Services (-0.31% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| TRI | VRSK | TRI / VRSK | |
| Capitalization | 33.4B | 22.1B | 151% |
| EBITDA | 3.15B | 1.69B | 187% |
| Gain YTD | -40.203 | -24.029 | 167% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.04 | 25.77 | 86% |
| Revenue | 7.66B | 3.1B | 247% |
| Total Cash | 489M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.45B | 4.63B | 53% |
TRI | VRSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRI's Valuation (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (17) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as TRI (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's SMR Rating (6) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRI (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRI’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as TRI (82) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as TRI (91) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
| TRI | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 54% | 14 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRI has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRI jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | 100% | -2.58% | ||
| RELX - TRI | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| EXPO - TRI | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| VRSK - TRI | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| MSA - TRI | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ARLO - TRI | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRSK has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRSK jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | 100% | -2.73% | ||
| EXPO - VRSK | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| TRI - VRSK | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| CTAS - VRSK | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| ABM - VRSK | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| RELX - VRSK | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More | ||||