UMBFO UMB Financial Corp Forecast, Technical & Fundamental Analysis

UMBFO in -0.27% downward trend, sliding for three consecutive days on September 28, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where UMBFO declined for three days, in 6 of 54 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 11%.

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where UMBFO's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 1 of 3 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 33%.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on UMBFO as a result. In 3 of 23 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 13%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for UMBFO just turned positive on October 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where UMBFO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 3 of 12 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 25%.

UMBFO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 8 of 59 cases where UMBFO Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 14%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 3 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: UMBFO's P/B Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (1.321). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (24.015). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.186). UMBFO's Dividend Yield (0.082) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.030). UMBFO's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.747).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. UMBFO’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. UMBFO’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.