GET DAILY SIGNALSAVDV vs VSS: Weighing an Active International Small-Cap Value Approach Against Broad Market Exposure
Key Takeaways
- Different strategies: AVDV is an actively managed international small-cap value fund, while VSS is a passive, index-tracking small-cap blend fund.
- Cost gap: VSS charges roughly 0.06% annually, far below AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
- Diversification profile: VSS holds roughly 4,800–4,900 stocks across developed and emerging markets, whereas AVDV holds around 1,700 names concentrated in developed-market value stocks.
- Sector tilt: AVDV leans heavily into materials, industrials, and financials, while VSS offers a more balanced mix with greater technology and real estate exposure.
- Emerging markets: VSS includes meaningful emerging-market allocation (roughly 20–25%), whereas AVDV is almost entirely developed-market focused.
- Risk and return drivers: AVDV's value and commodity tilt can amplify cyclical swings, while VSS provides broader, more index-like diversification.
Why These Two ETFs Stand Out for International Small-Cap Exposure
Investors looking for non-U.S. small-cap equities frequently consider the Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Both target the same broad asset class, yet they follow very different paths. AVDV applies a systematic value focus on developed-market companies with lower valuations and stronger profitability, while VSS aims for wide market-cap-weighted coverage that includes both developed and emerging markets. I find the comparison useful when deciding between a factor-oriented active strategy and a low-cost passive one.
AVDV's Focus on Value and Profitability
AVDV, launched in September 2019, is actively managed by Avantis Investors. It targets long-term capital appreciation through roughly 1,700 non-U.S. developed-market small-cap stocks, with the top 10 holdings making up only a modest portion of assets. Recent positions have included names such as AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik, Perseus Mining, B2Gold, Whitbread, Burberry Group, and Regis Resources. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Sector weights show a clear cyclical tilt, with basic materials at about 22–23%, industrials near 21%, consumer cyclicals around 16%, financials near 13%, and energy close to 9%. Japan leads country exposure at roughly 29–33%, followed by the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. The fund’s 0.36% expense ratio and low turnover reflect its buy-and-hold, rules-based value approach.
VSS Delivers Broad, Low-Cost Coverage
VSS, launched in April 2009, passively tracks the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. It holds about 4,800–4,900 securities, keeping individual positions very small and creating a highly diversified portfolio. Top holdings such as Hudbay Minerals, Taiwan Union Technology, Eldorado Gold, Aritzia, and Gaztransport & Technigaz each represent well under 0.5% of assets.
Sector allocation is more balanced, led by industrials at around 21%, information technology at 13–15%, basic materials at 12–13%, financials at 11–12%, plus meaningful exposure to consumer cyclicals and real estate. Japan accounts for about 12–13% of country exposure, with Canada, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and Australia also prominent, plus a 20–25% emerging-markets sleeve that includes India, China, and South Korea. The 0.06% expense ratio remains one of the lowest in the category.
Market Backdrop and Structural Differences
Both funds sit within the international small-cap space, where returns are influenced by global growth, currency moves, and commodity cycles. Recent periods have favored cyclical and value names in materials and energy, which aligns with AVDV’s heavier commodity tilt. Interest-rate expectations and the U.S. dollar’s path also play a role, as a weaker dollar often supports foreign equities. From what I see, AVDV’s developed-market value cyclicals contrast with VSS’s broader reach that adds faster-growing yet more volatile emerging economies.
Performance Drivers and Investor Positioning
Recently, AVDV has drawn strength from industrial metals, gold, and energy through its sizable mining and materials holdings in Australia, Canada, and Japan. This concentration can magnify both gains and losses relative to a broad benchmark. VSS has shown steadier, index-like behavior, with its technology, real estate, and emerging-market holdings helping to moderate volatility while limiting concentrated upside. The choice ultimately depends on whether an investor prefers deeper value and profitability tilts with higher concentration or maximum breadth at minimal cost.
Using Tickeron’s AI Screener for ETF Comparisons
In my research process, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to filter ETFs like AVDV and VSS by sector exposure, performance metrics, and volatility. The tool lets me quickly scan thousands of securities with customizable criteria and surface relevant comparisons without manual effort. It has become a practical step when evaluating how different strategies align with current market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
VSS in -2.10% downward trend, declining for three consecutive days on October 23, 2026
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where VSS declined for three days, in 209 of 266 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on VSS as a result. In 60 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
VSS moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for VSS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Aroon Indicator for VSS entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where VSS's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +0.59% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VSS advanced for three days, in 275 of 344 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
VSS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category ForeignSmallMidValue
Advertisement