As one of the largest investor-owned water utilities in the United States, California Water Service Group serves more than 2.2 million people across California, Hawaii, New Mexico, Washington, and Texas. Its quarterly earnings offer investors a read on the health of the regulated utility model, where revenue growth is driven primarily by approved rate increases and capital investment rather than economic cycles. The third-quarter report also carries added weight this cycle because it arrives alongside pending acquisitions of Nevada and Oregon water systems and an active PFAS compliance program. With a 10.27% authorized return on equity (ROE) locked in through 2027, investors are watching whether the company can convert its rate-base growth into reliable earnings per share expansion. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
For the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, California Water Service Group reported operating revenue of $332.2 million, a 6.7% increase from $311.2 million in the same period last year. The gain was driven by approximately $22.1 million from rate changes and new customers, plus $3.9 million from the Drought Response Memorandum Account, partially offset by a $4.4 million reduction from lower customer water usage.
Net income was $65.4 million, or $1.05 per diluted share, compared with $61.2 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, a year ago. While revenue matched consensus expectations of about $332.2 million, diluted EPS came in below the roughly $1.14 that analysts had anticipated. Operating expenses increased 3.7% to $249.5 million, with higher water conservation program spending and a scheduled reduction in Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) refunds weighing on results.
Shares of California Water Service Group traded modestly lower following the release, reflecting a solid but unspectacular quarter. The revenue result matched expectations and underscored the company's ability to grow through rate changes and new customers, but the earnings-per-share shortfall versus consensus tempered enthusiasm. Investors also weighed the dilutive effect of shares issued during the quarter through the company's at-the-market (ATM) equity program, which is being used to fund capital investment, acquisitions, and the repayment of short-term debt. The dividend declaration provided a steadying signal, reinforcing the company's reputation as a reliable income-oriented holding.
The most important near-term catalyst is the expected closing of the Nevada and Oregon system acquisitions before December 31, 2026. These transactions, along with recently arranged long-term debt and equity forward agreements, are intended to finance the company's initiatives into the first half of 2027.
On the regulatory front, management confirmed that the 10.27% authorized return on equity at Cal Water will remain in effect through 2027, with the authorized return on rate base at 7.46%. Investors should also track the company's ability to capture a potential step increase in the 2027 and 2028 rate-case years, which is tied to successfully deploying pre-approved capital.
The PFAS compliance program remains a significant driver. The company plans roughly $228 million in gross investment across California, New Mexico, and Washington, offset in part by $59.4 million in recovered litigation proceeds. Continued cost recovery and regulatory approvals will be key to protecting margins. Finally, watch water usage trends, wholesale water costs, and conservation program spending, all of which influenced this quarter's results and could shape upcoming periods. From what I see, these elements will determine how effectively the company executes on its growth plan.
In my research on utilities like this one, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly compare fundamentals, technical patterns, and peer performance across the sector. It helps surface ideas that might otherwise take hours to identify manually, giving a clearer view of where CWT stands relative to similar companies.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Oscillator for CWT moved out of oversold territory on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 27 of the 40 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 68%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CWT as a result. In 55 of 103 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CWT just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CWT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 51%.
Following a +4.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CWT advanced for three days, in 152 of 290 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
CWT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CWT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
CWT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CWT entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CWT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 59 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.613) is normal, around the industry mean (1.824). P/E Ratio (21.143) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.758). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.061) is also within normal values, averaging (3.694). Dividend Yield (0.028) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. CWT's P/S Ratio (2.729) is slightly lower than the industry average of (4.350).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CWT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of water utility services
Industry WaterUtilities