GET DAILY SIGNALSFIDI vs FIVA: Dividend Focus or Broader Value for International Exposure?
Key Takeaways
- Both FIDI and FIVA are passively managed Fidelity ETFs targeting developed international (non-U.S.) large- and mid-cap equities, and each charges a 0.39% expense ratio.
- FIDI tracks the Fidelity International High Dividend Index, emphasizing high dividend-paying stocks, while FIVA tracks the Fidelity International Value Factor Index, which screens for attractively valued companies.
- FIVA is the more diversified fund, holding roughly 110 securities across a wider sector spread, whereas FIDI holds about 100 securities with heavier concentration in income-generating sectors.
- Both funds carry significant exposure to Japan and to financials, but FIVA distributes country and sector weight more evenly, reducing single-country and single-industry risk.
- FIDI is income-oriented and may appeal to yield-seeking investors, while FIVA pursues a broader value factor that can perform differently across market cycles.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: FIVA — broader diversification, a disciplined valuation screen, and more balanced sector exposure make it the AI's preferred choice.
Why These Two Fidelity ETFs Draw Comparison
FIDI and FIVA often come up together because both deliver developed-market international equity exposure with a value tilt. Their approaches differ, though. FIDI centers on dividend yield and sustainability, while FIVA selects stocks based on attractive valuations through a dedicated value factor. For investors balancing income needs against broader factor exposure, understanding these structural differences helps inform allocation decisions in today’s environment.
FIDI: An Income-Focused International ETF
FIDI passively tracks the Fidelity International High Dividend Index, targeting large- and mid-cap developed international companies expected to sustain and grow dividends. The fund invests at least 80% of assets in index constituents and holds around 100 securities. Financials form the largest sector weight, followed by energy and industrials. Top holdings include names such as Equinor, TotalEnergies, and Canadian Natural Resources. With a 0.39% expense ratio, the strategy emphasizes mature, cash-generating businesses suited to income-oriented investors rather than serving as a broad market proxy.
FIVA: A Valuation-Driven Approach
FIVA tracks the Fidelity International Value Factor Index, selecting large- and mid-cap developed international companies with attractive valuations. It also invests at least 80% in index constituents and holds roughly 110 securities. Financials and industrials lead the sector allocations, with meaningful weight in information technology, health care, consumer discretionary, and materials. Representative holdings include ASML Holding, Nestlé, Shell, Siemens, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. The 0.39% expense ratio matches FIDI, yet the valuation-driven construction provides broader diversification and distinct factor exposure.
Market Context for Developed International Equities
Both ETFs operate in developed international markets where Japan and Europe have seen corporate reforms, shareholder-return initiatives, and relatively attractive valuations compared with U.S. equities. Rising dividend payouts and buybacks have supported income and value strategies. Macro factors such as interest-rate divergence, currency moves, and trade dynamics continue to influence positioning. Sector catalysts, including financials strength from a steeper yield curve and energy volatility, affect both funds. Risks include slower global growth, geopolitical tensions, and currency exposure that can heighten short-term volatility.
Recent Performance and Positioning
Over recent quarters both funds have gained from a rotation into international and value-oriented equities as investors sought diversification beyond U.S. mega-cap growth. FIVA’s value factor has shown steady momentum, aided by earnings in financials and a balanced sector mix. FIDI’s dividend emphasis has also delivered, though its heavier energy and financials concentration leaves it more sensitive to commodity prices and rate shifts. From a positioning view, FIVA generally offers lower sector concentration and more diversified country exposure, while FIDI provides higher income potential and may act more defensively in yield-focused markets. I also checked sector overlaps using Tickeron’s AI tools to confirm the diversification edge.
Using Tickeron’s AI Screener for ETF Comparisons
In my own research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when evaluating ETFs like these. The tool lets me filter across technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics to quickly surface how holdings compare across sectors and regions, helping refine allocation choices without manual effort.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
FIDI in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026
FIDI moved below its 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 35 of 42 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for FIDI moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 56 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 34 of the 56 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 61%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 62 cases where FIDI's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FIDI as a result. In 55 of 73 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FIDI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FIDI just turned positive on October 13, 2026. Looking at past instances where FIDI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The 10-day moving average for FIDI crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 16 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +0.31% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FIDI advanced for three days, in 300 of 358 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
FIDI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 290 of 356 cases where FIDI Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 81%.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category ForeignLargeValue
Advertisement