DIVI vs SCHY: Weighing Two International Dividend ETFs

Key Takeaways

• Both funds are low-cost, passively managed international dividend ETFs, but they pursue different goals: DIVI applies a broad dividend "tilt" to developed-market equities, while SCHY concentrates on a curated basket of high-yield, quality-screened names.
• DIVI holds roughly 430 stocks with a heavy weighting to financials and industrials; SCHY holds roughly 110–135 names with meaningful exposure to consumer staples, communication services, and energy.
• Cost is nearly identical: DIVI charges a 0.09% expense ratio versus SCHY's 0.08%, with SCHY offering a modest structural cost edge.
• SCHY's quality and sustainability screens (10+ years of consecutive dividends and lower volatility) give it a defensive, income-oriented profile, while DIVI's broader diversification adds growth exposure via technology and Japan.
• Tickeron AI Verdict: SCHY — the AI would currently favor the Schwab fund for its lower cost, higher yield, quality-driven stock selection, and stronger relative trend consistency.

Why These International Dividend ETFs Are Drawing Attention

International dividend investing has gained renewed attention as investors look beyond richly valued U.S. megacaps for income, diversification, and relative value. The Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and the Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) sit squarely at the center of this debate. Both are passive, non-U.S. equity funds targeting dividend payers, and both compete for the same investor dollar. Yet their methodologies diverge meaningfully: DIVI tilts a broad developed-market index toward higher yield, while SCHY selects a narrower, quality-filtered list of 100 international high-dividend stocks. Understanding those structural differences is essential for choosing the right fund for the current market cycle.

A Closer Look at DIVI

DIVI is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Rather than screening for individual dividend quality, the fund applies an optimization process to a broad developed-markets parent index, tilting the portfolio toward higher dividend yield while limiting tracking error. The result is a diversified fund of roughly 430 holdings with a 0.09% expense ratio. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the holdings compare to peers in the international dividend space.

Sector allocation leans heavily on financials (about 28%) and industrials (roughly 17%), followed by technology, healthcare, and consumer sectors. Top holdings include ASML, Roche, Nestlé, HSBC, Novartis, AstraZeneca, SAP, Siemens, BHP Group, and British American Tobacco. Geographically, the fund is anchored in the eurozone, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Because it applies a tilt rather than a strict yield screen, DIVI retains meaningful technology and growth exposure that many dedicated dividend funds lack.

Understanding SCHY

SCHY is a passively managed ETF that tracks the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index, composed of high-dividend-yielding stocks issued by companies outside the United States. The index screens for dividend sustainability, favoring companies with at least 10 consecutive years of dividend payments, financial strength, and lower volatility. The fund typically holds roughly 110–135 names and charges a 0.08% expense ratio.

Sector exposure is more defensive and income-focused than DIVI, with financials, consumer staples, communication services, and industrials each in the mid-teens percentage range, plus a notable energy allocation and minimal technology weight. Top holdings include Roche, TotalEnergies, DHL, British American Tobacco, Eni, GSK, Vinci, Unilever, Enel, and Wesfarmers. SCHY also carries a modest emerging-markets sleeve. Its quality-driven methodology produces a concentrated, higher-yielding portfolio with a distinctly value and low-volatility tilt.

The Broader Market Context

Both funds operate in the broad international dividend-value complex, which has benefited from several overlapping catalysts. A global value rotation, supported by still-attractive valuations relative to U.S. growth stocks, has redirected capital toward dividend payers in Europe, Japan, and Australia. Financials — a major overweight in both funds — have drawn support from relatively firm interest-rate expectations and steady credit conditions. Meanwhile, SCHY's energy and consumer-staples exposure links its fortunes to commodity prices and defensive cash flows, while DIVI's technology and Japan weighting ties it more closely to semiconductor cycles and currency dynamics. Key risks include a strengthening U.S. dollar, which can erode returns on unhedged foreign assets, and slowing global growth that pressures cyclical dividend payers.

How the Two Funds Compare in Recent Cycles

Over recent months and market cycles, SCHY has generally displayed stronger relative positioning, buoyed by its defensive sector mix and higher yield. Its concentration in staples, energy, and communication services has aligned well with value-oriented rotation and income demand, while its low-volatility screening has provided comparatively smoother drawdowns. DIVI, by contrast, offers broader diversification and a larger technology and Japan footprint, making it more sensitive to growth momentum and currency swings. In risk-adjusted terms, SCHY's quality filters and modest cost advantage have historically supported more consistent trend behavior, whereas DIVI's breadth can dilute the very income tilt it seeks to deliver.

My Take on the Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward SCHY. The Schwab fund combines a slightly lower expense ratio, a higher dividend yield, quality and sustainability screens, and a lower-volatility, defensive sector profile — characteristics that support more consistent trend behavior across recent market cycles. While DIVI offers broader diversification and greater growth exposure, its broader tilt can dilute income focus. The AI's probabilistic preference for SCHY reflects its superior cost efficiency, stronger income profile, and steadier relative positioning, though this is not a prediction of future returns.

Exploring Tickeron’s AI Tools for ETF Research

In my own analysis, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter international dividend ETFs by yield, volatility, and trend signals. The tool lets me scan thousands of securities with customizable criteria covering technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics, which helps surface ideas more efficiently than manual reviews. It has become a practical part of how I compare holdings like those in DIVI and SCHY without spending hours on spreadsheets.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Contributor

Allana|Expert

Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.

Industry description

Market Cap

High and low price notable news

Volume