Hepsiburada (NASDAQ: HEPS), formally D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading, stands as one of Türkiye's leading e-commerce platforms with operations spanning retail, marketplace, logistics, and financial technology. Its quarterly results provide a useful gauge of Turkish consumer demand and e-commerce trends, giving the report relevance that extends beyond this single ticker. Türkiye follows hyperinflationary accounting rules, so the company restates figures under IAS 29 to adjust for inflation. Investors focus on GMV growth, gross contribution margin, and EBITDA as the clearest indicators of underlying performance. After several quarters of heavy spending on customer and merchant growth, this report helps assess whether those investments are supporting lasting profitability.
For the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, Hepsiburada posted revenue of TRY 24,264.9 million, down 6.1% from TRY 25,842.3 million a year earlier. The drop came mainly from a 9.8% decline in direct sales (1P) revenue to TRY 15,644.1 million and an 11.9% fall in other revenue to TRY 1,345.4 million. These were partly offset by a 2.0% rise in marketplace (3P) revenue to TRY 3,187.5 million and a 6.4% increase in delivery service revenue to TRY 4,087.9 million. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Gross Contribution reached TRY 9,522.4 million, down 0.9% year over year, yet Gross Contribution Margin rose 0.9 percentage points to 15.4% of GMV. Bottom-line profitability still weakened. Net loss expanded to TRY 2,571.8 million from TRY 1,718.8 million in the prior-year period. EBITDA moved into negative territory at -TRY 134.1 million, or -0.2% of GMV, compared with a positive TRY 225.4 million, or 0.3% of GMV, in Q3 2025.
The company linked the wider loss mainly to lower revenue, smaller monetary gains, and increased shipping, packaging, advertising, and payroll costs from strategic growth efforts. Türkiye’s annual inflation rate was 29.7% as of September 30, 2026, down from 33.3% a year earlier, though the still-elevated level continued to influence costs and pricing.
Hepsiburada shares have moved sharply as investors balance the company’s growth spending against ongoing inflationary pressures in Türkiye. The stock has traded in a wide 52-week range of roughly $2.15 to $3.33, showing changing views on profitability and cash flow. Ahead of the report, focus was on whether gross contribution margins would hold steady even as inflation-adjusted revenue contracted.
The mixed outcome—better margins alongside a larger net loss and negative EBITDA—keeps attention on the sustainability of Hepsiburada’s investment approach. Rising shipping, advertising, and payroll costs for customer acquisition and faster delivery remain key concerns, while growth in marketplace and delivery revenue provides some offset. In my view, this quarter signals that the company is emphasizing longer-term scale over immediate earnings.
Looking ahead, the key question is whether Hepsiburada can turn its improved gross contribution margin into positive EBITDA. The company has not provided formal guidance for 2026, so analysts and investors must evaluate operating cost trends independently.
One important variable is the pace of inflation in Türkiye, which has eased but stays high. Lower inflation can support consumer spending power, yet it also cuts the monetary gains that have helped results under hyperinflationary accounting. The shift toward marketplace and delivery revenue, both of which expanded this quarter, will also warrant attention because these areas tend to have different margin characteristics than direct sales.
Cost control will be critical near term. Shipping and packaging, advertising, and payroll expenses all increased relative to GMV this quarter due to initiatives aimed at quicker delivery and customer growth. Whether these investments start to deliver efficiency gains will shape whether losses shrink in future quarters. Finally, updates on the financial technology and logistics segments, including Hepsipay and Hepsijet, should be watched as management sees them as longer-term sources of competitive advantage.
I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when reviewing quarterly results like these to quickly compare metrics across peers and spot patterns in e-commerce names. The tool lets me filter by industry, technical signals, and performance data, which helps put Hepsiburada’s margin improvement and revenue mix shift into broader perspective without manual number crunching. It has become a regular part of my workflow for identifying comparable setups in the sector.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HEPS turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where HEPS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HEPS as a result. In 61 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
HEPS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for HEPS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +1.45% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HEPS advanced for three days, in 196 of 255 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 108 of 144 cases where HEPS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 75%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 47 of 54 cases where HEPS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
HEPS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 22 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-1.718) is normal, around the industry mean (21.269). P/E Ratio (-0.141) is within average values for comparable stocks, (10.251). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.774). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.033) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.522) is also within normal values, averaging (1.328).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HEPS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HEPS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry InternetRetail